Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

delayed retirement credits

Q&A: The not-so-hidden costs of claiming Social Security at 62

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I’ll be 62 next year. I planned to start taking my Social Security of about $2,600 a month and just put that check into an investment account until I retire. However, if I’m going to be taxed $1 for every $2 over $23,000 that I make, then my plan needs to change. Maybe I should wait until 67. I make around $180,000 a year and that should continue until I retire. I loved my plan and am really disappointed that I cannot put it into play.

Answer: Sometimes the things we love aren’t good for us. Your plan would have shortchanged you and possibly your spouse.

You wouldn’t actually pay a 50% tax on your Social Security if you applied at age 62. What you would face is the earnings test, which withholds $1 for every $2 you earn over a certain amount, which is $24,480 in 2026. Given your income, your entire benefit would be withheld.

The earnings test would apply until you reached your full retirement age of 67. At that point, any money that was withheld would be added back into your benefit.

What isn’t added back is the additional money you would have received simply by postponing your application. If you wait, your benefit would grow about 30% between age 62 and 67. After 67, delayed retirement credits boost your benefit by 8% each year you delay until age 70, when your benefit maxes out. In addition, your benefit gets cost-of-living increases beginning at age 62, whether or not you’ve applied.

Those are guaranteed returns, by the way. Other investment returns are not. You could make more in the stock market, but you also could make less or lose money.

If you’re married and the higher earner, an early start would also stunt the survivor’s benefit. The effect can be so dramatic on the survivor’s finances that financial planners typically advise the higher earner to wait as long as possible to apply.

Q&A: Should I delay my pension payments as long as possible?

By

Dear Liz: I work for a local government and my job offers a pension as well as a 457 deferred compensation plan. If I delay starting my pension, will it have the same 8% growth that Social Security offers? Is my 457(b) plan much better than 401(k)?

Answer: Government pensions and Social Security both offer guaranteed income for life, but use different formulas for determining benefits.

Social Security is generally based on the worker’s 35 highest-earning years. Recipients can earn an 8% annual boost in their retirement benefit for each year they delay starting after their full retirement age, until benefits max out at age 70.

Pensions, meanwhile, are typically based on a combination of age, final salary and years of service. Delaying retirement typically does increase your benefit, but how much depends on the details of your plan. Many plans offer tools for estimating your future benefits, or you can contact your human resources department.

Your 457(b) plan has much in common with a 401(k). Both allow workers to contribute pretax money through payroll deductions up to certain limits ($24,500 in 2026, with an additional $8,000 catch-up contribution for those 50 and older, plus an additional $11,250 for those 60 to 63). The amount you ultimately get in retirement isn’t guaranteed but depends on how much you contribute and how the investments you choose perform over time.

A major difference between the two types of plans: 401(k)s typically offer some kind of matching funds, while 457(b)s often do not. On the other hand, early withdrawals from a 401(k) are usually penalized, while you can generally withdraw money from a 457(b) penalty-free after you leave your job.

Q&A: You can pause Social Security payments

By

Dear Liz: Are you allowed to stop your Social Security payments if you choose to make over the $23,000 limit?

Answer: When you start Social Security before your full retirement age, you’ll face the earnings test that reduces your benefit by $1 for every $2 you make over a certain limit, which in 2026 is $24,480.

You can suspend your Social Security payments once you reach your full retirement age. At that point, however, the earnings test will no longer apply.

The money you lost to the earnings test isn’t gone forever. The amounts that were withheld will be added back to your benefit over time. What you have lost is the increase in your benefit that would have occurred had you delayed your application until full retirement age.

You still have one last chance to benefit from delay, however. If you opt to suspend your benefit at full retirement age, you can get delayed retirement credits that will boost your check by 8% for each year between your full retirement age and age 70. For most people, that 24% boost plus accrued cost-of-living increases will be well worth the wait.

Q&A: Timing a Social Security application

By

Dear Liz: I know you work to maximize people’s money. I had a thought about the quality of life with Social Security. I took it at 65, which was then full retirement age. I was fully employed and did not need it to live. However, the extra money allowed us the opportunity to travel to all seven continents, help our kids with debts and down payments, and generally enjoy things with the extra cash. Now the full retirement age is 67, so there are fewer years between full retirement age and when benefits max out at 70. But the difference could still be enough for that motor home or world cruise.

Answer: All financial planning requires a balance between current and future spending. If you spend too much in the early years, you may not have enough to make it through the later ones. Retirement planning is further complicated by the fact that we don’t know how long we’ll live or how our health will hold up. We can delay spending so long that we’re no longer able to do the things we want to do, such as travel.

Still, the fact remains that when one spouse dies, one Social Security check goes away. That can lead to a devastating drop in income for the survivor. Because the survivor receives the larger of the two benefits, and may have to live on that amount for years, it almost always makes sense for the higher earner to delay filing as long as possible.

Q&A: When should a second earner start taking social security?

By

Dear Liz: I am 64 and still working and earning decent pay. My wife is 61 and retired. I have been a high earner for most of my life while she was working and raising our family. I don’t plan to retire anytime soon. Is it a good idea for her to start taking Social Security at 62?

Answer: The vast majority of people are better off delaying their Social Security applications for as long as possible so they can maximize their lifetime benefits. It’s especially important for you to delay, since as the higher earner, your benefit will determine what the survivor gets.

Your wife, however, may be one of the few who is better off starting early. That may be the case if you continue to delay your application, and her eventual spousal benefit is more than what she would receive on her own record.

If both of those things are true, she could start her own reduced retirement benefit at 62, then switch to a spousal benefit of up to half of your check after you apply for your benefits — preferably at age 70, when they max out.

Your wife won’t be able to get a spousal benefit until you apply for your own. On the other hand, she won’t be allowed to switch benefits if you’re already receiving yours when she applies.

Clearly, there are a lot of rules involved, and the best course for you two will depend on the specifics of your situation. You’d be smart to use a Social Security claiming site, such as Maximize My Social Security or Social Security Solutions, to help you determine your best approach.