Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Social Security claiming strategies

Q&A: Can I collect my ex-spouse’s Social Security survivor benefit if he remarries?

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I was married 37 years. I claimed Social Security at 62 because I needed the monthly income. I learned too late that if I had waited a few more years, my payment would have been much better. They did tell me that if my ex died before me, I would be entitled to have my amount increased to what he was collecting. He probably will die before me due to some serious health problems. He has since remarried to a widow who is receiving Social Security. Does she become the one who collects my ex’s monthly amount if he dies before her, which would mean she would be collecting two checks a month? And I would lose my ability to have my amount increased? I just want to be prepared for what I can expect when/if he departs before me.

Answer: When people qualify for multiple benefits from Social Security, they get the largest of the amounts available to them. So if your ex’s wife is currently receiving her own or a survivor’s benefit and your ex’s benefit is bigger, she would get this larger check as her survivor’s benefit after his death. She wouldn’t be able to collect on two husbands’ earnings records at the same time.

And what she gets doesn’t affect what you get. Since your marriage lasted at least 10 years, you should be eligible for a divorced survivor benefit of up to 100% of your ex’s benefit. Your survivor benefit would only be reduced if you started it before your own full retirement age.

Got a question about money? You can submit it here.

Q&A: Is it better to take Social Security earlier and invest it?

By

Dear Liz: I’m 64 and retired. My wife is 54 and still working. Half the people I talk to say take Social Security and just invest it, as you’ll make more than waiting until you get older. Others say that the tax hit isn’t worth it because my wife still works. I’ve talked to a couple financial people, and still get mixed answers. What is your opinion?

Answer: Social Security can be surprisingly complicated and many people don’t understand the nuances that should guide claiming decisions. In other words, half the people you’re talking to likely don’t know what they’re talking about.

Let’s start with a few basics, starting with the “tax hit.” If you have income other than Social Security, up to 85% of your benefit may be subject to tax. That doesn’t mean 85% of your benefit is taxed away. It means up to 85% is included in your taxable income, and subject to your tax bracket. In 2026, federal tax brackets range from 10% to 37%.

The earnings test can have a dramatic impact if you start Social Security before your full retirement age. The earnings test reduces your benefit by $1 for every $2 you earn over a certain limit ($24,480 in 2026). If you’re retired and not earning money, though, the earnings test doesn’t apply regardless of what your spouse might earn.

What starting early does do is permanently reduce your benefit. If you’re the higher earner, it also reduces the survivor benefit that one of you will get when the other dies. At that point, the smaller of a couple’s two checks goes away and the survivor has to make do with a single benefit.

If you delay, on the other hand, your benefit gets larger. After full retirement age, delayed retirement credits add 8% each year until your benefit maxes out at age 70. This guaranteed return is about twice what you’d currently get from any other low-risk investment, such as one-year Treasuries. You might earn more in the stock market, but you also could suffer losses.

Copious research shows that most people are better off delaying. You can start by reading “How Much Lifetime Social Security Benefits Are Americans Leaving On the Table?” by David Altig, Laurence J. Kotlikoff & Victor Yifan Ye for the National Bureau of Economic Research at https://www.nber.org/papers/w30675.

Q&A: Will Taking Social Security at 62 Affect Your Spousal or Survivor Benefit?

By

Dear Liz: I am a teacher, retiring this June. I have my teacher’s pension and will receive a small Social Security benefit as well. I am married and my husband’s Social Security benefits are far greater than mine. Should I start drawing on my Social Security benefits next year when I turn 62, assuming when my husband starts drawing on his when he turns 70 in seven years I will then get a higher benefit? Is there any downside to taking my Social Security benefits for seven years while I wait for him to start taking his?

Answer: Your early start would reduce the future spousal benefit you’ll be eligible for when your husband applies at age 70, says Mary Beth Franklin, a former Investment News columnist and author of “Maximizing Social Security Benefits.” The early start would not, however, reduce your future survivor benefit should your husband die first.

Spousal and survivor benefits are both based on your husband’s work record, but they’re calculated using different rules.

Spousal benefits can be up to 50% of your husband’s benefit at his full retirement age. If you’re already receiving your own benefit, the spousal “top off” adds an additional amount to your check once your husband applies and you’re eligible for a spousal benefit. The top off amount is calculated by subtracting your benefit at full retirement age (FRA) from 50% of your husband’s benefit at full retirement age.

A simplified example may help show the effect of an early start. Let’s suppose your own retirement benefit would be $1,000 a month at age 67 and your husband’s benefit at his full retirement age would be $3,000. Social Security subtracts your FRA benefit ($1,000) from half of his ($1,500) to determine the “top off” amount ($500). If you apply for your own unreduced benefit at age 67, the top off amount would be added once your husband applies for his benefit and triggers a spousal benefit for you.

If you start early, on the other hand, your own benefit would be permanently reduced. Starting at 62 means you’d receive $700 a month. Once your husband applies and the spousal benefit is triggered, you’d get the additional $500, but now you’d be receiving $1,200 a month instead of $1,500 you would get if you’d waited.

That doesn’t mean you should delay, Franklin notes. The additional cash could make it easier for your husband to put off filing. And, as noted above, an early start on your own benefit wouldn’t affect any future survivor benefit.

While spousal benefits are based on your husband’s benefit at full retirement age, survivor benefits are based on what he actually receives (or what he had earned, if he dies before starting benefits). If your husband waits to file until after his full retirement age, his benefit earns 8% annual delayed retirement credits until his benefit maxes out at age 70. As a survivor, you would be eligible to receive up to 100% of that benefit.

Q&A: Should I draw down my 401(k) before accepting Social Security?

By

Dear Liz: I am a 66-year-old single male working part-time (not by choice, but it’s the best I can get). I earn about $24,000 per year plus another $4,000 in unemployment during the summer. Work provides healthcare, so I don’t have Medicare premiums yet. With fixed expenses at roughly $50,000 per year, I am withdrawing from my 401(k) to cover the gap until I reach full retirement at the age of 70. If they will let me, I hope to continue to work until 75 because I love my job. At this rate, I will have exhausted the 401(k) by age 70, leaving me with a $100,000 CD earning 4%. Am I right to use the 401(k) as a bridge to full Social Security?

Answer: The advantages of delaying Social Security are typically so great that financial planners often recommend tapping other resources, including retirement funds, if that allows you to put off your application. Social Security’s delayed retirement credits boost your payment by 8% each year between your full retirement age and age 70, when benefits max out. A maxed-out payment is a powerful hedge against longevity risk, which is the danger of living so long that you deplete your savings.

However, a financial planner probably would suggest you also look for ways to decrease your living expenses to avoid completely exhausting your retirement accounts. As you’ve discovered, older people can have a harder time staying employed, even when their health cooperates. You may not be able to work as long as you’d like, and the average Social Security check is closer to $2,000 than the $4,000 or more you would need to meet your fixed expenses.

Consider seeking out a fiduciary financial advisor who can review your situation and offer personalized advice. Your employer or 401(k) provider may offer access to such advisors, or you can look for a financial coach or accredited financial counselor affiliated with the Assn. for Financial Counseling & Planning Education at www.afcpe.org.

Q&A: Could spouse’s early start stunt Social Security survivor benefit?

By

Dear Liz: My husband and I plan to delay taking Social Security retirement benefits until the higher-earning spouse is 70. This is to ensure the highest possible survivor benefit. However, the lower-earning spouse will be turning 62 at the same time that the higher earning spouse turns 70. We are concerned that the lower-earning spouse’s future survivor benefit will be reduced if the lower earner starts benefits early. When would be the best time for the lower-earning spouse to take retirement benefits and ensure that the survivor’s benefit remains the same?

Answer: The lower earner won’t reduce the survivor benefit by starting early, but they will permanently reduce their own benefit or any spousal benefit they’re owed. Most people are better off waiting at least until their full retirement age to start Social Security benefits so they can avoid this reduction.