Dear Liz: I’ll be 62 next year. I planned to start taking my Social Security of about $2,600 a month and just put that check into an investment account until I retire. However, if I’m going to be taxed $1 for every $2 over $23,000 that I make, then my plan needs to change. Maybe I should wait until 67. I make around $180,000 a year and that should continue until I retire. I loved my plan and am really disappointed that I cannot put it into play.
Answer: Sometimes the things we love aren’t good for us. Your plan would have shortchanged you and possibly your spouse.
You wouldn’t actually pay a 50% tax on your Social Security if you applied at age 62. What you would face is the earnings test, which withholds $1 for every $2 you earn over a certain amount, which is $24,480 in 2026. Given your income, your entire benefit would be withheld.
The earnings test would apply until you reached your full retirement age of 67. At that point, any money that was withheld would be added back into your benefit.
What isn’t added back is the additional money you would have received simply by postponing your application. If you wait, your benefit would grow about 30% between age 62 and 67. After 67, delayed retirement credits boost your benefit by 8% each year you delay until age 70, when your benefit maxes out. In addition, your benefit gets cost-of-living increases beginning at age 62, whether or not you’ve applied.
Those are guaranteed returns, by the way. Other investment returns are not. You could make more in the stock market, but you also could make less or lose money.
If you’re married and the higher earner, an early start would also stunt the survivor’s benefit. The effect can be so dramatic on the survivor’s finances that financial planners typically advise the higher earner to wait as long as possible to apply.