Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Liz Weston

Q&A: Can I switch from my Social Security to a spousal benefit?

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I will be 62 in January. My husband turns 70 in July. If I take my Social Security benefits at a reduced rate at 62, can I switch to half of his benefits once he turns 70 and applies? Let’s say my reduced benefit at 62 is $1,000 per month and my husband’s maximized benefit at 70 is $4,000 per month. Can I switch to a spousal benefit for a payment of $2,000?

Answer: You may be able to switch, but you’ll get a lot less than $2,000.

The spousal benefit is based not on what the husband receives, but on his benefit at his full retirement age, which for illustration purposes we’ll say is $3,200. The spousal benefit can be up to half that amount, or $1,600. If you apply at 62, though, you’ll be accepting a permanent reduction in both your own retirement benefit and any future spousal benefit, as I explained in an earlier column. The reduction is steep enough that you probably wouldn’t notice much of a change once your husband applies and you qualify for the spousal addition.

Those are the rules for spousal benefits. Survivor benefits are a different matter. Survivor benefits are based on what your husband actually receives (or what he’s earned, if he dies before starting benefits). Also, the early start of your own benefit wouldn’t reduce the future survivor benefit you receive should he die first.

In many cases, the smart approach to maximizing Social Security benefits means waiting at least until your own full retirement age and often until age 70 to apply. Your mileage may vary, of course, so it can be helpful to use a good Social Security claiming strategies calculator and to carefully read the reports they generate. T. Rowe Price has a free Social Security Optimizer at https://www.troweprice.com/usis/advice/tools/social-security-optimizer/strategy.

Got a question about money? You can submit it here.

Q&A: When a new school district has a bad retirement plan

By 1 Comment

Dear Liz: I have taught for 22 years and recently accepted a position in a neighboring school district. I have a 403(b) retirement plan invested in a low-cost target date fund. The neighboring district’s vendor list does not include this option. Would it be more advantageous to leave my money in the current account or to roll it into a brokerage with a target date fund? If so, how do I choose what’s right for me?

Answer: As a teacher, you need to be aware that many districts’ 403(b) plans are scandalously bad. Instead of offering sensible, low-cost options, these subpar retirement plans are filled with high-fee annuities.

Your current plan is one of the better ones, since you have access to low-cost mutual funds. You can investigate the neighboring district’s plan at 403bwise.org, a nonprofit site dedicated to educating teachers about the issue. The site has reviews of many districts’ plans. If your new district isn’t included, the site has tips on how to get more information, evaluate your options and press for change.

If the new plan is a stinker, you can leave your money in the old plan, although you won’t be able to make new contributions. You also could consider rolling the account into an IRA at a brokerage. (Don’t move it to a regular brokerage account, as that would be considered a withdrawal that can be taxed and penalized.) An IRA would give you vastly more investment options, but if your 403(b) allows loans you’d lose the ability to borrow against your account. Also, workplace retirement plans such as 403(b)s and 401(k)s typically allow penalty-free withdrawals starting at age 55 if you leave your job, while with IRAs you generally must wait until age 59½.

The question remains if you should consider investing in the new district’s plan. The answer is yes if it includes any of 403bwise’s “green” rated options of low-cost funds. The answer is probably no otherwise. Teachers without good investment options should consider lobbying their district to adopt another type of retirement account, the 457(b) plan. For more information, check out 403bwise’s sister site, 457bwiser, at https://457bwiser.org/.

Q&A: Roth IRA conversions can benefit your heirs—but at a cost

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I have been reading the questions about converting an IRA to a Roth and want to know how it might apply to my situation. I have been getting my required minimum distributions for a while, and I have been paying the surcharges on Medicare because of my higher income. Would it still be worth it to convert to a Roth? My children have very good income so inheriting my IRA and paying the taxes on that will probably be a burden. Thoughts?

Answer: A Roth IRA is a wonderful asset to inherit. Beneficiaries typically must empty the account within 10 years, but the withdrawals are entirely tax free.

That generosity comes at a cost, of course. You’d have to pay the taxes on any amounts you convert from your IRA, and the conversions could trigger even higher Medicare premiums. A tax pro can guide you about whether conversions make sense as well as how to do them: gradually over time or all at once.

Got a question about money? You can submit it here.

Q&A: Why marriage can reduce taxes on a home sale

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: We are a heterosexual couple who are registered domestic partners in California. We have owned our primary residence for decades. Obviously, its value has increased and is well past the $500,000 home sales exemption limit for couples.

When one of us passes away, how is the basis and the appreciation of the residence calculated for federal and state taxes? Does the step-up basis come into play for both federal and state taxes when calculating capital gains? We do not have any children and are leaving the bulk of our estate to charity.

Answer: California offers the valuable double step-up in tax basis to registered domestic partners, but the federal government does not.

In most states, one half of a couple’s jointly owned property gets a new value for tax purposes when the first partner dies. This step-up in value eliminates capital gains taxes on any appreciation that happened during the deceased partner’s ownership.

In community property states, however, both halves of jointly owned property can get the step-up in value when the first spouse dies. California generally treats registered domestic partners the same as married couples, but IRS Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Regulation 301.7701-18(c) specify that “marriage” and “spouse” do not include registered domestic partnerships for federal tax purposes, according to Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting.

Let’s say you bought the house for $300,000 in the 1980s, invested $100,000 in upgrades over the years and it’s worth $2 million today. The current tax basis would be $400,000 (the sales price plus the upgrades). That’s the amount the two of you would subtract from the sales price to determine the potentially taxable capital gain. You could exempt $500,000 of the home sale proceeds ($250,000 per owner) since you’ve owned and lived in the property at least two of the past five years. That leaves a taxable gain of $1.1 million.

If one of you died tomorrow, only half of the property would get stepped up to the current market value for federal tax purposes while the other half would retain its $200,000 basis for a total basis of $1.2 million. For state tax purposes, both halves would get the step-up so the new tax basis for state taxes would be $2 million.

Something else to consider: a federal law allows the full $500,000 exclusion for surviving spouses if they sell the home within two years of the death. That provision is not extended to registered domestic partners.

As you can see, a marriage certificate could make an enormous difference if the survivor wanted or needed to sell the home after the first death.

Marriage confers a number of other benefits under federal law. A spouse can receive Social Security spousal and survivor benefits, for example, but registered domestic partners aren’t eligible for benefits on a partner’s earnings record. Spouses also have special rights with IRAs and employer retirement plans, such as being able to treat an inherited IRA as their own. Non-spouse beneficiaries, including domestic partners, generally must empty the accounts within 10 years.

Your mileage may vary, but the benefits are numerous and valuable enough to make marriage worthwhile in many cases. Please talk to your tax pro and estate planning attorney for individualized advice.

Q&A: Can I open a Roth IRA for my minor grandchildren?

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: Where can I open a Roth IRA for my minor grandchildren?

Answer: Fidelity, Charles Schwab and Vanguard are among the large brokerages that offer custodial IRAs with no account minimums or fees.

Getting your grandkids started with saving for retirement is a great idea, but they’ll need to be earning their own money before you can contribute to an IRA or a Roth IRA for them. You can match whatever taxable income they receive from a job or self-employment up to the annual contribution limit, which is $7,500 in 2026. You’ll want to keep copies of the tax returns showing their income in case you’re ever audited.

If the minor doesn’t have taxable income, you could consider contributing to a Trump account. That requires filling out IRS Form 4547, but only certain people in a certain order are allowed to fill out the form. For example, if the children have a legal guardian, that person fills out the form. If there’s no legal guardian but the child has a parent, the parent fills out the form. If there is no parent, an adult sibling can fill out the form. Only if there is no legal guardian, parent, or adult sibling is a grandparent allowed to fill out the form. Once the account is established, up to $5,000 per year per child can be contributed.

That’s only the start of the many complicated requirements surrounding these accounts, so seek a tax pro’s advice before proceeding.

Keep in mind that with Trump accounts, the money is turned over to the child at 18, while custodial accounts must be turned over by the age of majority (typically either age 18 or 21, depending on the state). If you want to maintain control of the money for longer, consider funding a 529 college savings account. The contribution limits are much higher, the money is tax-free when used for qualified education expenses, and up to $35,000 can eventually be rolled over to a Roth IRA.

Q&A: Social Security disability benefit doesn’t increase at retirement age

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: If someone is currently receiving Social Security disability payments, does the monthly dollar benefit change when they reach age 62 or at full retirement age?

Answer: Social Security disability payments convert to a retirement benefit when the recipient reaches their full retirement age, which is currently 67. The dollar amount doesn’t change, although recipients continue to get cost-of-living adjustments.