Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Retirement Savings

Q&A: Using retirement savings to pay down debt is risky business. Do this instead

By

Dear Liz: I’m way behind on retirement funds. I did get pension funds from my employer after 25 years of service but used a large portion to pay debt that was crushing me. I’m widowed, age 62 and work full time as a nurse. I rent my place. How do I catch up? I have $200,000 in an IRA.

Answer: This answer comes too late for you but may help others who are overwhelmed by debt as they approach their retirement years.

People understandably want to pay what they owe, but bankruptcy is sometimes the best of bad options. This is particularly true as you approach the end of your working years and don’t have enough time to replenish your savings. The typical bankruptcy filing can erase debt while protecting the retirement funds you’ll need for the future. Before using your lump sum pension payout to pay debts, you should have discussed your situation with a bankruptcy attorney.

At this point, your best options may be to work as long as possible, save as much as you can and figure out a smart Social Security strategy. As a widow, you may qualify for Social Security survivor benefits as well as your own retirement benefit. You can’t receive both simultaneously, but you would be allowed to switch between benefits. For example, you could start survivor benefits and then switch to your own when it maxes out at age 70, if that amount is higher. Typically you would want to wait until at least your full retirement age to start benefits, because otherwise you’ll face the earnings test that reduces your benefits by $1 for every $2 you earn over a certain amount, which in 2024 is $22,320. Paid services such as Maximize My Social Security or Social Security Solutions can help you determine the best approach.

Q&A: Trust in the flexibility of living trusts

By

Dear Liz: Is naming a beneficiary for a nonretirement, “payable on death” account as effective as putting the account in a living trust? It seems easier than doing all the paperwork each time I open an account, but is it a good idea?

Answer: Both living trusts and payable on death accounts avoid probate, the court process that otherwise typically follows death. But living trusts offer more flexibility and control.

Let’s say you want to benefit two relatives equally, and are leaving a savings account to one and a brokerage account to the other. The balances of the two accounts may be roughly equal today, but could be dramatically different by the time you die. A trust allows you to divvy up your assets regardless of where the money is kept.

Trusts also allow you to put restrictions on how money is spent, which can be important if your heir is a minor child, a spendthrift or someone reliant on public benefits. Payable on death accounts don’t allow restrictions.

Should you become incapacitated, the successor trustee of your living trust could access trust assets to pay for your care. Beneficiaries of payable-on-death accounts can’t get to the funds until you die, so a court procedure may be necessary to provide for you.

After you die, the person settling your estate probably will need money to cover your burial and funeral expenses, pay your bills and final taxes and perhaps get your house ready for sale. If the needed funds have already been distributed to beneficiaries of payable on death accounts, this person might be faced with asking for funds to be returned or paying out of their own pocket, says Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach.

There’s also the piecemeal nature of payable on death accounts. Keeping track of and updating beneficiaries can be a chore. If a beneficiary dies before you, that can create administrative problems as well.

Payable on death accounts can be a low-cost solution for people who don’t have much money and who can’t afford to pay for a trust. If you already have a trust, though, it makes sense to use it.

You typically don’t have to update your living trust every time you open a new account, by the way. Discuss the issue with your estate planning attorney, but typically all that’s needed is to add the account to the schedule of assets that’s usually at the end of your trust document.

Q&A: A retirement catch-22 and health savings accounts

By

Dear Liz: My wife and I are withdrawing an unusually large amount from our IRAs in order to make a 20% down payment on the construction of a new retirement home. This withdrawal will, unfortunately, bring our modified adjusted gross income above the limits that will cause increases in our Medicare premiums in 2026. Is there any way to avoid this increase?

Answer: You have the right to appeal an increase in your premiums, but successful appeals usually require someone to have experienced a drop in income due to retirement, a spouse’s death or divorce, for example. A one-time increase in your income — because of a large IRA withdrawal or capital gains from the sale of a home, for example — usually won’t qualify for relief.

As you know, Medicare’s income-related monthly adjusted amount (IRMAA) adds surcharges to Part B and Part D premiums when incomes exceed certain amounts. In 2024, IRMAA starts when modified adjusted gross income exceeds $103,000 for individuals or $206,000 for married couples filing jointly. There’s a two-year delay between when you report your income and when IRMAA increases your premiums.

The good news is that the increase isn’t permanent. If your income goes back to normal next year, so will your 2027 premiums.

Q&A: These major financial decisions shouldn’t be DIY projects. Talk to an expert!

By

Dear Liz: I anticipate being dead soon (cancer). I have established an irrevocable trust for my 8-year-old child, with my 47-year-old wife as the trustee. With respect to taxes and other issues and naming beneficiaries, what is the optimal strategy regarding my child for life insurance and traditional and Roth IRAs? My wife will get the 401(k).

Answer: The best person to answer those questions is the estate planning attorney you (presumably) used to create the irrevocable trust. Estate planning should not be a do-it-yourself activity, particularly when minor children are involved. The wrong plan could give too much too soon to your child, or tie up the money too long. You also don’t want to unreasonably stint your wife in your efforts to preserve money for your child. Also, the optimal strategies for tax purposes may not be the best for your family’s situation.

For example, the best way to minimize taxes may be to leave all the retirement money to your wife. Spouses who inherit retirement funds have the option of treating the accounts as their own. That means your wife wouldn’t have to begin required minimum distributions from the 401(k) or the traditional IRA until she’s 75. (The current RMD age is 73, but it rises to 75 for people born in 1960 and later.) She would not have to take distributions from a Roth IRA she inherits from you.

Non-spouse heirs generally have to drain retirement accounts within 10 years. Minors who inherit retirement funds don’t have to take the first distribution until they turn 21, but then the accounts must be emptied within 10 years.

Life insurance proceeds typically aren’t taxable, or payable to a minor child. But you can create a trust to receive and dole out the proceeds to your child. Your estate planning attorney can help you set this up.

Q&A: When temptation to spend an inheritance strikes, what’s the right move?

By

Dear Liz: My brother is 54 and has always worked low-wage jobs. He owns a condo thanks to the help of our parents, and his monthly expenses are very low. He’s in a stable position. He does not have any retirement savings or really any other savings to speak of. Recently, he came into an inheritance of $62,000. He has asked my sister and I to help him make that grow and be secure until he retires and chooses to draw on it. What is the best way to help him grow this money in a safe way? We’d like it to be somewhat secured as we all are aware that the temptation to spend it now is strong.

Answer: The first step in investing is understanding your goal for the money and your timeline (how long until you may need the cash).

Your brother likely has at least two goals: an emergency fund and retirement savings.

Financial planners typically recommend an emergency fund equal to three to six months of expenses. A smaller amount can work for people with a lot of other resources, such as stocks they can sell, lines of credit they can borrow against or generous relatives who are willing to help. A larger amount might be smart for people with fewer resources or who might be out of work for extended periods.

Emergency funds need to be accessible, so the money should be in a safe, liquid place such as a bank account. To make the cash less tempting, your brother could consider opening a savings account with an online bank. These banks typically have no minimums and no fees, plus they pay a higher interest rate than their brick-and-mortar kin. Transferring the money to his checking account would typically take a few days, making it less easy to spend on impulse. Another option is to buy certificates of deposit to tie the money up for a set period of time. He can break into the CDs in an emergency but would have to forfeit some interest.

He can take more risk with his retirement funds, as he is likely at least a decade away from retirement. One option is to invest in a low-cost target date retirement fund, which gradually gets more conservative as the retirement date approaches.

Your brother can contribute up to $7,000 this year to an IRA or a Roth IRA. A Roth IRA may be the better option, since he’s unlikely to get much tax benefit from an IRA’s deductible contribution and Roth IRAs don’t have minimum distribution requirements.

He doesn’t have to limit his retirement savings to that annual contribution, however. He could consider investing more with a regular brokerage account and just mentally earmarking it for retirement.