• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

  • About
  • Liz’s Books
  • Speaking
  • Disclosure
  • Contact

Medicare

Q&A: Don’t leave your finances on automatic

June 22, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: During the 2024 open enrollment period for Medicare, your column mentioned that Part D enrollees’ out-of-pocket payments in 2025 would be limited to $2,000, but only for covered prescriptions. That spurred me to be sure my prescription drug plan covered the one brand name drug I take. It didn’t and I found the only plan in my area that does just in time before the open enrollment period ended.

More recently, I learned from your column that I can pay Medicare premiums from my health savings account. Like many HSA participants, I have been letting my contributions accumulate for later-in-life medical expenses. But now that my husband and I are investigating moving into a continuing care retirement community, it helps to know that we have the option of paying Medicare premiums this way and have more money left over each month after we pay the monthly fee.

Answer: Thanks for sharing those experiences!

It can be easy to leave our finances on automatic, but there are at least two areas where it’s important to shop every year: health insurance and auto insurance. Health insurers constantly change their formularies, or list of covered drugs, as well as what tier a drug might be assigned to. A prescription you get cheaply this year could be more expensive next year or not covered at all. Auto insurers, meanwhile, tend to raise rates on loyal customers because they know many people will stay put out of inertia.

It’s also important to have a plan to eventually spend HSA funds before you die. A spouse can inherit an HSA and retain its tax advantages, but the account becomes taxable if anyone else inherits it.

Filed Under: Medicare, Q&A Tagged With: health savings account, HSA, Medicare, Medicare Part D, Medicare prescription drug plan

Q&A: Should I consider Roth conversions now or after I retire?

June 16, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My husband and I both waited until age 70 to start Social Security. I will be 72 in September and am considering retirement. My husband is retired, 74, and taking required minimum distributions (RMDs). We have always tried to maximize contributions to our pre-tax retirement accounts and are now realizing the downside as we pay taxes on those mandatory withdrawals. Should I consider Roth conversions now or after I retire? I realize I will need to pay taxes on those conversions, but would it be best to do that when my income is lower? I am thinking about my kids and their future.

Answer: Late-in-life Roth conversions can be tricky. The amount you convert is removed from RMD calculations, lowering future tax bills. But the conversion is added to your current taxable income, potentially making more of your Social Security taxable and temporarily raising your Medicare premiums (thanks to income-related monthly adjustment amounts or IRMAA) in addition to generating a big tax bill.

Theoretically, a conversion could still make sense if your current tax rate is lower than the one you’ll have once you start required minimum distributions at 73. The case for conversion is strengthened if you want to pass this money to your kids. They likely would have to empty any inherited retirement account within 10 years, and they could be in their peak earning (and tax-paying) years when they do so. By converting now, you would in effect be paying the tax bill for them, perhaps at a lower rate than they might face, and allowing them to inherit the money tax-free.

A tax pro can help you with the calculations so you’ll understand the financial impact of a conversion. Then you can make an informed decision about whether to proceed.

Filed Under: Medicare, Q&A, Retirement, Retirement Savings, Taxes Tagged With: IRAs, IRMAA, Medicare, Roth conversions, Roths

Q&A: How do I avoid a Medicare surcharge?

May 11, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I will be applying for Medicare next year. Last year I received an inheritance, and also sold a second home which increased our taxable income for the year. I once read that there is a form that needs to be completed to let Medicare know that this is only a one-time occurrence. However, my tax advisor said that there is no need to let Medicare know and he had not heard of any such form. I feel he does not understand that the higher income might affect our Medicare premiums. My understanding is that if I don’t submit the form, my Medicare payment will be a lot higher than expected. Can you suggest what I should do?

Answer: There is such a form, but it’s unlikely to help in your situation.

Medicare premiums are based on your income from two years earlier, as shown on your tax returns. People with higher incomes face “income related monthly adjustment amounts” (IRMAA) that can substantially increase their Medicare Part B and Part D premiums. (Part B covers doctor’s visits and Part D covers prescriptions.)

Form SSA-44 is designed to help people whose income has taken a hit because of major life changes, such as retirement, divorce or the death of a spouse. It’s not designed to spare people who had taxable windfalls, such as capital gains from a property sale.

Inheritances generally aren’t taxable events, however, with a few exceptions. If you inherit someone’s IRA, for example, you generally must start withdrawals which are typically taxable. Otherwise, inherited money and assets typically don’t show up on your tax returns or affect your Medicare premiums.

Filed Under: Medicare, Q&A, Taxes Tagged With: appealing IRMAA, IRMAA, Medicare, Medicare surcharge

Q&A: Should I get Medicare supplemental insurance?

May 4, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I’m about to retire and have decided on original Medicare with a Medigap policy rather than Medicare Advantage. Can a Medigap company cancel your medical plan, and can they deny a medical procedure? Are there extra charges for preexisting conditions or other coverage issues?

Answer: Medigap is another name for Medicare supplement insurance. This coverage is provided by private insurers to help pay out-of-pocket costs such as deductibles, co-payments and co-insurance for treatments approved by Medicare.

If you apply for a Medicare supplemental policy during your initial enrollment period, you have something known as “guaranteed issue rights.” The insurer offering the policy can’t deny coverage or charge you extra for preexisting conditions. If Medicare approves a treatment or procedure, the supplemental coverage applies — the insurer can’t independently decide to deny you.

If you miss that initial enrollment period, however, you may be subject to medical underwriting. An insurer can charge you more, impose waiting periods or refuse to issue you a policy.

Your initial enrollment period typically starts when you turn 65 and sign up for Part B, the part of Medicare that covers doctors’ visits. If you delay Part B because you have employer-provided health insurance, then the six-month open enrollment period will start after you sign up for Part B. (You have eight months after your employer coverage ends to enroll in Part B without penalty.)

An insurer can cancel a Medigap policy only if you stop paying your premiums, you provide false information on your application or the insurer becomes insolvent. If you lose your coverage through no fault of your own, you would have guaranteed issue rights to buy a Medigap policy from another insurer.

Filed Under: Medicare, Q&A, Real Estate Tagged With: Medicare, Medicare supplement insurance plans, Medicare supplemental plan, Medigap

Q&A: What you can expect from a fiduciary advisor

March 30, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: This is concerning the couple in their 70s who were persuaded to move their nearly $2-million retirement portfolio to a different broker, resulting in a capital gain of $184,000 and a capital gain tax bill for $50,000.

The question I wonder is whether the $184,000 capital gain also kicked them into a higher Medicare premium bracket (which you frequently warn your readers about) or whether they were already in the higher bracket for other reasons (i.e. the amount of their annual required minimum distribution, plus the size of their Social Security or pension benefits).

The problem with their new broker is that this couple seem surprised to learn they would have a capital gain and a sizable capital gain tax bill by transferring their portfolio from their existing broker to the new broker. Shouldn’t the new broker, with its “fiduciary” duty, have warned them that they would incur a huge capital gain and a sizable capital gain tax bill and also checked to see what the influence of the capital gain would be on this couple’s Medicare premium (if any)?

Answer: The couple did not say they were surprised by the tax bill. They said their accountant was not pleased, which apparently caused them to question their decision.

Let’s define some terms. “Broker” in this context typically refers to a stockbroker. Stockbrokers normally aren’t fiduciaries, meaning they’re not required to put their clients’ best interests first. Instead, stockbrokers are usually held to a lower “suitability” standard, which means they can recommend investments that aren’t the best option for their clients as long as those investments aren’t actually unsuitable.

Registered investment advisors, on the other hand, are fiduciaries. This couple’s new RIA should have explained why the investment sales were necessary and detailed the costs, including the tax bill and any affect on Medicare premiums. The RIA should have explored other options as well, such as leaving the portfolio alone or extending the investment sales over multiple years. The RIA would have recommended a course of action, but would execute whatever plan the couple ultimately chose.

Filed Under: Investing, Medicare, Q&A, Taxes Tagged With: fiduciaries, fiduciary, fiduciary advice, fiduciary advisor, fiduciary duty

Q&A: Medicare premium increase offsets cost-of-living boost

December 15, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My wife and I are well over 70 and receive Social Security. We pay for Medicare Part B as well as IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) for Part B and Part D via deductions from our monthly checks. We just received our annual notice from the Social Security Administration of the 2.8% cost-of-living increase for 2026. At the same time, our Medicare deductions were increased such that we ended with a monthly $20 increase in Social Security for my wife and $80 for me. That hardly goes along with the sentence in the standard letter from the SSA that the COLA helps us keep up with the cost of living. Are we just lucky that our monthly checks from the government did not actually decrease?

Answer: In a word, yes.

The cost of healthcare and healthcare insurance typically rises faster than the general rate of inflation. Medicare costs haven’t increased as quickly as those for private insurance. However, it’s still not unusual for higher Medicare premiums to wipe out Social Security cost-of-living increases for the year.

Fortunately, you have other resources to help you cope with inflation. IRMAA is a Medicare surcharge that kicks in for people with modified adjusted gross incomes over $109,000 if single or $218,000 if married filing jointly. The surcharge is determined by your income tax return from two years ago, so your 2026 IRMAA is based on your 2024 filing.

Filed Under: Medicare, Q&A Tagged With: COLA, cost of living, cost of living increase, IRMAA, Medicare, Social Security

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 9
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Copyright © 2026 · Ask Liz Weston 2.0 On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in