Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Q&A

Q&A: When temptation to spend an inheritance strikes, what’s the right move?

By

Dear Liz: My brother is 54 and has always worked low-wage jobs. He owns a condo thanks to the help of our parents, and his monthly expenses are very low. He’s in a stable position. He does not have any retirement savings or really any other savings to speak of. Recently, he came into an inheritance of $62,000. He has asked my sister and I to help him make that grow and be secure until he retires and chooses to draw on it. What is the best way to help him grow this money in a safe way? We’d like it to be somewhat secured as we all are aware that the temptation to spend it now is strong.

Answer: The first step in investing is understanding your goal for the money and your timeline (how long until you may need the cash).

Your brother likely has at least two goals: an emergency fund and retirement savings.

Financial planners typically recommend an emergency fund equal to three to six months of expenses. A smaller amount can work for people with a lot of other resources, such as stocks they can sell, lines of credit they can borrow against or generous relatives who are willing to help. A larger amount might be smart for people with fewer resources or who might be out of work for extended periods.

Emergency funds need to be accessible, so the money should be in a safe, liquid place such as a bank account. To make the cash less tempting, your brother could consider opening a savings account with an online bank. These banks typically have no minimums and no fees, plus they pay a higher interest rate than their brick-and-mortar kin. Transferring the money to his checking account would typically take a few days, making it less easy to spend on impulse. Another option is to buy certificates of deposit to tie the money up for a set period of time. He can break into the CDs in an emergency but would have to forfeit some interest.

He can take more risk with his retirement funds, as he is likely at least a decade away from retirement. One option is to invest in a low-cost target date retirement fund, which gradually gets more conservative as the retirement date approaches.

Your brother can contribute up to $7,000 this year to an IRA or a Roth IRA. A Roth IRA may be the better option, since he’s unlikely to get much tax benefit from an IRA’s deductible contribution and Roth IRAs don’t have minimum distribution requirements.

He doesn’t have to limit his retirement savings to that annual contribution, however. He could consider investing more with a regular brokerage account and just mentally earmarking it for retirement.

Q&A: A little known, and restrictive, benefit for vets and their spouses

By

Dear Liz: Some time ago you referenced an “aid and attendance benefit” for veterans and their spouses. We have a 94-year-old bedridden widowed mom who has a permanent catheter and is tube-fed each day. I had never heard about this benefit and can’t seem to find a contact anywhere within the Department of Veterans Affairs who can help. Who can I contact?

Answer: The aid and attendance benefit isn’t well known, perhaps because the rules for who can get it are restrictive and complex.

You can find a summary of the benefit on the Veterans Affairs website. The benefit is actually a supplement to veterans’ pensions. To get a pension, the veteran must have served during wartime and meet income and asset restrictions. To get the aid and attendance benefit, the vet must have a medical need for assistance or supervision. Surviving spouses may be eligible if they were married to the veteran at the time of their death. There are numerous other rules and the application can be tough to navigate. For help, consider contacting the National Veterans Foundation, a nonprofit that helps vets and their families. Its Lifeline for Vets toll-free helpline is (888) 777-4443.

Q&A: Is it better to spread your wealth between two financial advisors?

By

Dear Liz: My parents left me with financial accounts at two companies. My instinct is to combine them to deal with one less company. Is there a downside to doing this?

Answer: You should first determine whether any of the inherited accounts is a retirement account because those come with special rules. You can’t simply merge an individual retirement account with a taxable brokerage account, for example. And you’ll want to consult a tax pro to understand how to properly title and take distributions from any inherited retirement account.

If the accounts are regular taxable accounts, then consolidating can have many advantages. Your accounts will be easier to monitor, asset allocation strategies will be simpler to execute and your account expenses could drop, particularly if you use the lower-cost company. Some brokerages offer deposit bonuses, and a higher combined balance also may entitle you to additional perks.

The primary downsides to consolidation involve risk mitigation. Brokerage failures are rare, but they do happen, and some investors opt to use more than one brokerage if their account balances exceed coverage by the Securities Investor Protection Corp.

SIPC provides coverage of up to $500,000, including $250,000 for cash, if cash or securities are missing from an account when a brokerage fails. Similar accounts are combined for SIPC purposes, so multiple IRA accounts at one brokerage will be considered one account. However, the $500,000 limit applies to each category of account. So someone with an individual account, a joint account, an IRA and a Roth would have a total of $2 million in SIPC coverage.

Having accounts at different companies also can help you retain access to at least some of your money if one of your accounts is hacked.

Q&A: Minimizing your taxes is fine — to a point

By

Dear Liz: In reading your columns, one can get the impression that reducing tax liability is the primary objective for many financial advisors. I disagree with this. Paying a fair share of taxes is a responsibility to society and the less fortunate, especially for wealthy people. Why are so many financial “professionals” so obsessed with paying less in taxes?

Answer: Tax planning is an essential part of comprehensive financial planning. No one is under an obligation to pay the maximum tax possible. Those who specialize in tax avoidance love to quote a judge named Learned Hand, who wrote in 1934: “Anyone may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.”

Where advisors — and taxpayers — get into trouble is when they prioritize tax avoidance over all other concerns. That’s how you get advisors doing tax loss harvesting on a financial account to reduce capital gains for an older couple in the 0% capital gains bracket (an example of this behavior from a recent column).

Q&A: Old inherited IRA is safe from “drain it in 10 years” requirement

By

Dear Liz: You have written that non-spouse beneficiaries are now required to drain their inherited IRAs within 10 years. Is this requirement retroactive?

I inherited an IRA from my mother in 2015. I have been taking out the minimum required each year. If I must drain the account within 10 years, will the increase in yearly income affect my Social Security benefits?

Answer: The 10-year requirement applies only to accounts inherited from people who died after Dec. 31, 2019.

IRA distributions don’t affect Social Security benefits, but could affect Medicare premiums if the withdrawal is large enough. Taxable income above certain limits triggers a Medicare surcharge known as an income-related monthly adjustment amount, or IRMAA.