• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

  • About
  • Liz’s Books
  • Speaking
  • Disclosure
  • Contact

Liz Weston

Q&A: Benefits of Medicare Advantage HMOs

February 10, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: You mentioned that Medicare Advantage Plans have networks that can change from year to year, as well as other disadvantages. This is not true for our Medicare Advantage HMO, according to my experience. The HMO has its own doctors and hospitals, but I have not noticed them pulling any surprises. And they do look after your health much better than the traditional Medicare that some of my friends are on. My friends’ care is entirely in their own hands, and some are getting very old and would benefit from the care that my HMO provides.

Answer: You’ve highlighted one of the key advantages of a Medicare Advantage HMO, which is coordinated care.

There are two main types of Medicare Advantage plans, the all-in-one private insurance alternative to original Medicare. With PPOs — preferred provider organizations — people are generally allowed to see medical providers outside their networks, although those visits will cost more. With HMOs — health maintenance organizations — you’re expected to stay in the network for most care, and you often need a referral to see a specialist. You could pay up to 100% of the cost if you use a doctor or hospital not in the HMO.

In exchange for those restrictions, people get a primary care provider who coordinates all of their care. That’s in contrast to PPOs or original Medicare, where a patient may have many providers who never talk to each other.

Filed Under: Medicare, Q&A Tagged With: HMO, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Medicare Advantage plan, Medicare Advantage plans, PPO

Q&A: A divorced couple considers retying the knot to maximize Social Security payments

February 10, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I was married for 33 years and divorced 4 years ago. We have reconciled and are now back living together as a couple, but have not remarried. I’m 68, and my former spouse is 63. Neither of us is drawing Social Security, but we are now considering applying. Will she be able to draw more if we were to get remarried? It seems as if half of my payment will be more than what she’d get on her own. Also, when should I start drawing my benefit to maximize the payment?

Answer: Let’s start with the simpler of the two answers. Your benefit maxes out at age 70, so waiting until then to apply is usually the right strategy. Maximizing your check also maximizes the survivor benefit, or divorced survivor benefit, your partner might eventually receive.

The amount your partner would get as a spouse or a divorced spouse would be the same: up to 50% of your benefit at your full retirement age, assuming that amount is greater than her own benefit. To qualify for a divorced spousal benefit, the marriage must have lasted at least 10 years and two years must have passed since the divorce.

There’s one crucial difference between spousal and divorced spousal benefits, however. If you remarry one another, she will have to wait for you to apply for Social Security before she can qualify for a spousal benefit. If you don’t remarry, she doesn’t have to wait. A divorced spousal benefit can start as early as age 62, as long as the ex-spouse is also at least 62.

That doesn’t mean your partner should rush out to apply. Applying early — before her full retirement age of 67 — means settling for a smaller check.

Filed Under: Divorce & Money, Q&A, Social Security Tagged With: divorced spousal benefits, divorced spouse benefits, divorced survivor benefit, survivor benefit, survivor benefits

Q&A: Roth conversions and holding periods

February 4, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: Eight years ago I converted a number of stocks from an IRA to a Roth IRA and paid the taxes. Now I am in a position to convert the last shares but want to do it incrementally over the next four years. Does each conversion then require its own five-year waiting period or will anything in the existing Roth now qualify to be withdrawn at any time?

Answer: The IRS requires five-year holding periods before earnings can be withdrawn tax-free from Roth accounts. The five-year rule applies separately to each Roth conversion, so the partial conversions you’re contemplating will each have their own five-year holding period, says Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting.

That’s different from regular Roth accounts, where the five-year rule starts the year the account was first opened and isn’t triggered again by subsequent contributions, Luscombe says.

Filed Under: Q&A, Retirement Savings, Taxes Tagged With: five-year holding period, IRA conversion, Roth conversion, Roth five-year, Roth IRA

Q&A: Credit cards and co-signers

February 4, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My son is in his mid-20s. He has a credit card that we co-signed and that has a credit limit he would likely not qualify for on his own. He would like to remove us as co-signers as he starts to take more personal control of his finances. Would it make more sense to apply for a new card using only his income information, and then slowly stop using the old card? Or is it better just to take the hit on his credit rating now and request our removal from the old card?

Answer: It’s not clear whether you’ll be able to bow out of this arrangement without closing the card. Most major credit card issuers don’t allow co-signers. More typically, parents would add their children as authorized users. While the parents can remove their children from the account, the opposite isn’t true.

If this is a co-signed card, the issuer may have an option for removing you. Your son will need to call and ask.

In general, though, it would be better for his credit to apply for a card on his own and leave this account open.

Filed Under: Credit Cards, Credit Scoring, Q&A Tagged With: authorized user, co-signer, co-signing, co-signing credit card, Credit Cards, Credit Scores

Q&A: Hard copies, thumb drives and the cloud: How to handle vital records when it’s time to flee

February 4, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: We are assembling our important document to-go box with the typical things advised should we need to evacuate, such as birth and marriage certificates, passports, insurance documents, mortgage statements, etc. Many of the documents can be accessed online, so I wondered about pay-off statements from old loans and mortgages. Is it important to take copies of those? Also, what about grant deeds from previous properties that we no longer own?

Answer: In a disaster, you’ll need information to help you establish your identity and document what you currently own. Focus on safeguarding the most important paperwork and figure you can recreate the rest if necessary.

Start with documents that would be time-consuming or a hassle to replace, such as passports, birth and marriage certificates, immigration records, military records, vehicle titles, home inventories, appraisals, home plans or blueprints, recent tax returns and wills or other estate planning documents. The originals should be stored in a water- and fireproof place, such as a home safe or other secure location.

Consider storing copies of these documents, along with photos of your driver’s license and vehicle registration, on an encrypted thumb drive in your go bag or in a secure cloud-based storage service (Everplans is one option.) You could put physical copies in your evacuation bag, but much of the information could be helpful to an identity thief if stolen so you’ll have to weigh convenience against security.

Insurance policies are usually accessible online, but you may want to include your insurance companies’ contact information and policy numbers.

Also consider digitizing any family photos that aren’t already stored in the cloud. You may not have time to grab albums, and disaster victims often lament not having copied irreplaceable photos.

Filed Under: Emergency Preparedness, Legal Matters, Q&A Tagged With: disaster, disaster kit, emergency kit, emergency preparedness, go bag, to-go bag

Q&A: Navigating the Risks of 401(k)s, IRAs, and Payable-on-Death Accounts

January 27, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: You recently wrote about the drawbacks of payable on death accounts, including that the funds go directly to the beneficiaries before the estate’s expenses are paid. Aren’t all 401(k)s payable on death? I’m often reminded to update my beneficiary info whenever I log into my account. Should 401(k)s be converted to IRAs once we leave our jobs when we retire? At least one of my 401(k) accounts from a previous job is still in that company’s plan, as it is a very good plan. Can we designate that certain expenses be paid from the accounts before our beneficiaries receive their inheritance?

Answer: Retirement accounts, including 401(k)s and IRAs, typically have named beneficiaries that will inherit the money directly. That means retirement accounts have the same potential drawback as payable-on-death bank accounts or transfer-on-death arrangements. If you have no other assets when you die, the person who settles your estate may have to appeal to these beneficiaries to return some of the money to pay your final bills. The beneficiaries usually would be under no obligation to cooperate, however.

You could name your estate as your beneficiary, but that could have some tax drawbacks so you should consult an attorney before doing so.

Filed Under: Inheritance, Q&A, Retirement Savings Tagged With: Estate Planning, estate planning attorney, living trusts, payable on death, payable on death accounts

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 779
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Copyright © 2025 · Ask Liz Weston 2.0 On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in