Couples & Money

Q&A: Beware of transferring a home’s title before death

February 9, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I am in my late 70s. My husband is in his mid 80s and in poor health. Are there advantages to transferring the title to our house into my name alone so I can be the sole owner?

Answer: Owning the house solo could make it easier for you to sell or refinance without your husband’s involvement.

But you would miss out on a significant tax break. At least one half of the property — and both halves in community property states — get a new value for tax purposes when a spouse dies. This “step up” in tax basis can reduce or eliminate capital gains taxes when the house is sold.

There could be additional drawbacks, depending on where you live and your circumstances. A tax pro or an estate planning attorney can give you personalized advice.

Q&A: Only married couples in community property states get this tax benefit

September 1, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I own a house with my longtime boyfriend. If one of us dies, how does the capital gains step-up affect the other?

Answer: The deceased partner’s share of the home will get a new basis for tax purposes. The survivor’s share will not.

Tax basis helps determine how much of a capital gains tax bill you might face when you sell a home or any other asset that gained value over time. Your basis is generally what you paid for the home, plus qualifying improvements.

Inherited assets typically get a step-up in tax basis to their current market value, which means that no one has to pay taxes on the appreciation that occurred during the original owner’s lifetime.

If you were married and living in a community property state such as California, then the entire house could get stepped up to the current market value when the first spouse dies. This is known as the double step up. But this applies only to married couples in community property states. Unmarried couples in community property states and couples in other states don’t get this benefit.

Q&A: Why each spouse should have a credit card in their own name

August 18, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My husband was the primary account holder on our credit cards and I was the authorized user. When he recently passed away, I was told I had to close the cards. I have tried to open my own credit cards and have been declined by two banks because my debt is too high. I am the co-signer for my two daughters’ mortgages, making it look like I owe more than $1 million. My daughters have always made the monthly payments and have done so for six years. I also have almost $1 million in investments. I told the bankers I could bring in these documents as proof I’m credit card worthy and they said they don’t look at outside evidence, only the credit reports. So here I am, in my 60s without a credit card. Should I just settle and be an authorized user on my daughters’ cards? What can I do?

Answer: Thank you for providing another vivid example of why it’s important for each spouse to have one or two credit cards in their own names. Many people don’t realize that credit cards typically aren’t jointly held, and the death of the primary account holder can leave them cut off from credit.

Being added as an authorized user to your daughters’ cards is a good first step. You also might consider approaching a credit union, since these member-owned financial institutions are often more flexible about granting credit than the typical big bank.

Unfortunately, these mortgages will continue to affect your debt-to-income ratio until they’re paid off or your daughters refinance — and given the low rate they presumably got, refinancing is not likely to be an attractive solution.

Q&A: Be careful when commingling old and new funds in a Roth IRA

February 24, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I am a stay-at-home mom of 15 years who has a Roth IRA account from working before marriage. I will start working again soon and would like to know how to best protect my separate property from my future community property earnings. Should I start a new Roth IRA instead of adding to my existing one so as to not commingle the funds?

Answer: That could be a smart idea.

In general, assets acquired before marriage are considered separate property. But that status can change if post-marriage funds are added into pre-marriage accounts. The rules vary by state, but making retirement contributions to a new account can help keep the lines between separate and marital property from getting blurred.

Are two savings accounts safer than one?

August 26, 2024 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My wife and I will be receiving a sizable amount of money. We want to put the money into a high-yield joint savings account. We don’t want to exceed the FDIC protection. Can we each open joint accounts at the same bank and have each account covered up to the $250,000 limit?

Answer: That’s not quite how it works.

FDIC insurance is per depositor, per ownership category. Ownership categories include single accounts, joint accounts, certain retirement accounts such as IRAs and trust accounts, among others.

A joint account for the two of you would be covered up to $500,000, or $250,000 for each owner. A second joint account at the same bank would not increase your insurance coverage. If you had one joint account plus two single accounts, then your total coverage at the bank would be $1 million ($500,000 for the joint account, plus $250,000 for each individual account).

This assumes none of the accounts has beneficiaries. Naming one or more beneficiaries turns either joint or single accounts into trust accounts, for insurance purposes. Each owner of a trust account is covered up to $250,000 per beneficiary, to a maximum of $1.25 million for five or more beneficiaries.