• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

  • About
  • Liz’s Books
  • Speaking
  • Disclosure
  • Contact

Taxes

Q&A: He’s held stocks for decades. Should he sell before he dies?

August 12, 2024 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My father-in-law, age 100, has more than $1 million in stocks and bonds purchased in the 1980s and 1990s. With the stock market so high, I have suggested that he might want to sell the investments, take the tax hit and consolidate into short-term certificates of deposit or similar. This would make it easier for his family to manage (in trust) upon his death. Does this make sense or do we leave it alone?

Answer: Selling now means your father-in-law would have to pay a substantial and perhaps unnecessary tax bill on the gains he’s incurred over the years. If he instead leaves those assets to his heirs at his death, most likely no tax would be owed on the gains.

There are some exceptions, such as if the investments are held in retirement accounts or an irrevocable trust. But investments held in revocable trusts, such as living trusts, should qualify for the favorable step-up in basis that would eliminate the taxable capital gain at his death.

Yes, there’s always a risk that the markets could drop — but they would have to drop pretty far to wipe out all his gains, assuming he’s got a reasonably diversified portfolio. A fee-only, fiduciary financial planner could review the portfolio and offer recommendations about any changes that might be needed, while a tax pro could discuss potential strategies for minimizing the tax bill.

Filed Under: Estate planning, Investing, Q&A, Taxes Tagged With: capital gains tax, Estate Planning, Inheritance, step-up in tax basis, Taxes

Q&A: When landlords move in to an old rental, are tax breaks part of the deal?

July 29, 2024 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My husband and I bought a single-family home as a rental property in 1988. We paid $135,000. The tenants moved out in February and we are doing major upgrades now. If we moved into the property and sold it after two years, would the first $500,000 of gain be excluded from income tax? The property is under our family trust and our two daughters are successor co-trustees.

Answer: Generally speaking, a former rental property can qualify for the home sale exclusion as long as the owners claim it as their primary residence for at least two of the five years before the sale.

The home could still be subject to depreciation recapture, however, says Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting. You probably deducted depreciation on the rental over the years — basically reflecting the wear and tear on the property. The IRS typically requires that tax break to be paid back when the property is sold. You won’t be able to exclude the part of the gain that’s equal to any depreciation deduction allowed or taken after May 6, 1997, Luscombe says.

If your trust is a revocable living trust, which is designed to avoid probate, your ability to take the home sale exclusion won’t be affected. Other types of revocable trusts may require the home to be taken out of the trust before it’s sold, Luscombe says. If it’s an irrevocable trust, the sale of the home generally would not qualify for the home sale exclusion, he says.

You should discuss this with a tax expert before proceeding, and consider reviewing other options for reducing taxes. For example, if you kept this home until death and bequeathed it to your heirs, there probably wouldn’t be any tax on the appreciation that occurred during your lifetimes.

Filed Under: Q&A, Real Estate, Taxes Tagged With: capital gains, home sale, home sale exclusion, real estate, rental, Taxes

Q&A: Minimizing your taxes is fine — to a point

July 15, 2024 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: In reading your columns, one can get the impression that reducing tax liability is the primary objective for many financial advisors. I disagree with this. Paying a fair share of taxes is a responsibility to society and the less fortunate, especially for wealthy people. Why are so many financial “professionals” so obsessed with paying less in taxes?

Answer: Tax planning is an essential part of comprehensive financial planning. No one is under an obligation to pay the maximum tax possible. Those who specialize in tax avoidance love to quote a judge named Learned Hand, who wrote in 1934: “Anyone may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.”

Where advisors — and taxpayers — get into trouble is when they prioritize tax avoidance over all other concerns. That’s how you get advisors doing tax loss harvesting on a financial account to reduce capital gains for an older couple in the 0% capital gains bracket (an example of this behavior from a recent column).

Filed Under: Financial Advisors, Q&A, Taxes Tagged With: financial advice, financial advisors, Taxes

Q&A: A greedy friend eyes a suitcase of (suspected) drug money

July 1, 2024 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: A person I know who is in his 80s and very wealthy recently described having a suitcase of old cash. The bills date from the time before the electronic strip was introduced. He said, “I don’t know what to do with this.” Long ago he sold marijuana. I immediately thought that this should pass into the hands of those who are struggling (which includes me). How could this be done legally?

Answer: Your acquaintance should talk to his tax pro. Money is supposed to be declared to the IRS as it’s earned, and that includes proceeds from illegal activities.

There are statutory limits to how long a person can be prosecuted for dealing drugs. There’s no statute of limitations, however, if a taxpayer files a fraudulent return or fails to file a return at all. That’s how the feds ultimately got gangster Al Capone: He was convicted of tax evasion for failing to file tax returns declaring his illegal income.

What your acquaintance should not be doing is talking to anyone else about this cash — particularly someone whose immediate thought is how to get their hands on it. He should consider getting evaluated for cognitive decline, and putting measures in place to protect himself from fraud and elder abuse.

Filed Under: Q&A, Taxes Tagged With: aging, cognitive decline, IRS, paying taxes, Taxes

Q&A: When an inherited house gets sold, it pays to know the tax rules

June 17, 2024 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My sister and I inherited a house from our mom in 2003. Back then, it was appraised at close to $500,000. It’s now worth $1.3 million and we want to sell and split the profits. My sister has lived in the house since Mom passed. Approximately what would the tax liability be?

Answer: You’ll determine the potentially taxable profit by subtracting the tax basis — the amount the house was appraised for at your mother’s death, plus any qualifying improvements — from the sale proceeds. Your sister can exempt $250,000 of her share of the profits, since she has owned and lived in the house for two of the previous five years. If her share of the profit was $400,000, for example, she would owe long-term capital gains taxes on $150,000 of that.

As a non-occupant, you wouldn’t have the option to exempt any of the profit, so you would owe long-term capital gains taxes on your entire $400,000 share. Long-term capital gains rates depend on your income, but the federal rate is 15% for most.

Filed Under: Estate planning, Home Sale Tax, Inheritance, Q&A, Real Estate, Taxes Tagged With: capital gains, capital gains tax, home sale, home sale exclusion, home sale profits, home sale tax, Inheritance, Taxes

Q&A: Need help with your IRA? Call a CPA, or maybe a PFS

May 13, 2024 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My husband and I have substantial pre-tax savings in our workplace retirement plans and IRAs. Based on where those balances would be in retirement, we would definitely be paying more in taxes than now, and face the potential of running out of money if forced to withdraw it all. You often refer people to the Garrett Planning Network for fiduciary financial planners. Is there a similar organization for tax planners who can provide a strategy for rolling over our pre-tax accounts in order to take part of the hit now, and reduce taxes later? The financial planners we’ve found through Garrett have some tax knowledge, but refer us to tax professionals for more in-depth tax analysis.

Answer: Many fee-only financial planners work with tax professionals such as certified public accountants — CPAs — to craft Roth conversion plans that can reduce future taxes. If you want an all-in-one pro, though, you could consider hiring a CPA who is a personal financial specialist, or PFS. The PFS credential is similar to the certified financial planner credential, but is granted only to CPAs. To find one in your area, you can use the American Institute of CPAs’ directory at https://www.aicpa-cima.com/directories. Click the plus sign next to “Find a credential/designation holder,” select “PFS” in the box titled “Credential/designation name” and then input your location.

Filed Under: Financial Advisors, Q&A, Taxes Tagged With: AICPA, CPA, CPA-PFS, financial advice, personal financial specialist, Roth conversion, tax advice, Taxes

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 79
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Copyright © 2025 · Ask Liz Weston 2.0 On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in