October 24, 2023 By

Q&A: Home sales and taxes

Dear Liz: My in-laws passed away earlier this year within months of each other. Their primary asset, part of their living trust, is their home, worth close to $1 million. There is a reverse mortgage of about $332,000 that will be paid off once the house sells. Will capital gains tax apply to the four beneficiaries? Or do we get to take advantage of the step up in cost basis? The house is in escrow right now. I don’t think the house has gone up in value since the last death.

Answer: The home will get the favorable step up in tax basis. That means the beneficiaries won’t have to pay capital gains tax on all the appreciation that happened during the parents’ lifetime.

Filed Under: Home Sale Tax, Inheritance, Mortgages, Q&A, Real Estate, Taxes
October 24, 2023 By

Q&A: So you’ve got a friend spewing investment advice from social media. Here are some grains of salt

Dear Liz: I am in my early 60s and have a friend the same age who keeps telling me to invest in companies which she has found from looking at YouTube videos. She says that she picks stocks by seeing which companies are repeated over and over again in different videos. She claims she is making a 400% return. She tells me I am losing money by investing in safer products, such as certificates of deposit. First of all, is this a good idea to invest everything in stocks, when one is in their mid-60s to 70s, when retirement is on the horizon? Also, neither she nor I are working full time at the moment, so, the risk is great if the market goes up and down and the value of a portfolio changes. I’ve seen my retirement funds drop the last few years, even though they are ever so slowly creeping back up. Finally, what is your opinion on getting financial advice or stock picks from social media platforms?

Answer: Perhaps your friend is the next Warren Buffett. More likely she’s exaggerating her results or simply hasn’t dealt with a down market yet. Few investors can consistently produce outsize returns over time, especially when they’re essentially picking stocks at random.

In answer to your first question: It’s rarely smart to invest everything in any one thing, whether it’s stocks, bonds, real estate, certificates of deposit or alpaca farms. Diversification helps investors reduce risk. If one type of investment is performing poorly, another may be doing better.

Having some money in “safe” investments may be prudent, but you’re typically losing ground to inflation with low-return CDs or Treasurys. Most people will need to have at least some portion of their portfolios in stocks, before and after retirement, if they want to outpace inflation.

Filed Under: Financial Advisors, Investing, Q&A
October 24, 2023 By

Q&A: Social Security survivor benefits

Dear Liz: My husband died 10 years ago. He had a good salary for many years. I just turned 60 and have been told that I may now claim Social Security benefits as his widow. He has a minor child from another relationship. If I claim survivor benefits now, will it diminish the benefits his child now receives?

Answer: No. If you’re still working, however, your benefit will be reduced by $1 for every $2 you earn over a certain limit, which in 2023 is $21,240. The earnings test disappears once you reach full retirement age, which is 67 for people born in 1960 and later.

Also, you’re allowed to switch from a survivor benefit to your own and vice versa. That flexibility is unusual, and could allow you to let your own benefit grow until it maxes out at age 70. You may want to consult a fee-only financial planner or a Social Security claiming strategy site for advice.

Filed Under: Kids & Money, Q&A, Social Security
October 24, 2023 By

Q&A: Don’t try evading Roth IRA requirements

Dear Liz: My son is a student. He would like to maximize his Roth IRA at the annual $7,000 limit and has the money in savings to do so. However, his income from odd jobs, paid in cash, will probably be less than the $7,000 required to make this maximum contribution. Can he report additional income on his income tax beyond what he earned, pay the associated additional income taxes and thus meet the $7,000 income requirement?

Answer: Your son’s enthusiasm for retirement savings is commendable, but filing fraudulent tax returns is not. He can’t contribute more than he legitimately earns.

Filed Under: Q&A, Retirement Savings
October 16, 2023 By

Q&A: Finding an affordable fee-only financial advisor

Dear Liz: You always advocate hiring a fee-only financial advisor. But where do you really find one? I found those who say they are fee-only are really “assets under management” advisors when you dig down deep, and the cheapest fee-only advisor I’ve found costs $6,000. I just want them to look over my financial plan and help craft a retirement investment portfolio.

Answer: The “assets under management” model — where the advisor charges 1% or so of your portfolio in exchange for financial advice — is probably the most common fee-only arrangement. But there are others. The Garrett Planning Network, for example, represents planners who charge by the hour. XY Planning Network and Alliance for Comprehensive Planners offer referrals to planners who charge retainer fees.

You also might consider talking to an accredited financial counselor. These fee-only, fiduciary professionals typically charge less than a comprehensive financial planner does and could be a good fit for those with simpler needs. You can get referrals from the Assn. for Financial Counseling & Planning Education.

Filed Under: Financial Advisors, Q&A
October 16, 2023 By

Q&A: You might have unclaimed retirement benefits. How to find them

Dear Liz: My wife recently received from the Social Security Administration a notice of “Potential Private Retirement Benefit Information.” It cites a 401(k) account with a previous employer with a relatively small balance and states the “year reported” as 1992. My wife does not have any recollection of ever cashing out this account. Should the account still be accessible or are 401(k) accounts subject to abandoned property laws?

Answer: Keep in mind that many small accounts in that era were simply cashed out. The company sent the departing worker a check with a certain amount withheld for taxes, and that was that.

Still, even a small account could have grown substantially in the meantime, so it’s worth trying to find out if it might still exist somewhere. A couple of places to check first would be the National Registry of Unclaimed Retirement Benefits, which allows you to search using your Social Security number. Another site to check for missing money of all sorts is the National Assn. of Unclaimed Property Administrators.

If nothing turns up, your wife should try to find the plan’s administrator. If she has any old statements or paperwork from the plan, the administrator or plan provider would be listed. If not, and her former employer is still in business, she can call the human resources department to find out what company administered the plan.

If that doesn’t work, her next stop would be the Department of Labor’s efast system to look for the plan’s Form 5500. Employee benefit plans have to file these annual reports and include contact information. FreeErisa is another site to check for Forms 5500.

Filed Under: Q&A, Retirement Savings, Social Security
October 16, 2023 By

Q&A: Options for transferring condo to heirs

Dear Liz: I would like to get advice on how to transfer my condo to my son and grandchildren. It looks like I don’t have too much living left and need to get a clear understanding of what would be better for me and for them. All the articles are very confusing. Can you advise me on what is better, transfer on death or some other form of transfer that avoids probate?

Answer: Transferring your condo while you’re still alive probably isn’t a good idea, since the property wouldn’t get the favorable step up in tax basis when you die. Without that step up, your heirs could owe capital gains taxes on the appreciation that occurred during your lifetime.

You could leave the property to your heirs in your will, but that would involve your estate going through the court process known as probate. In many states, probate isn’t a big deal. In other states, including California, probate can be lengthy, expensive and worth avoiding.

A living trust is often the best way to transfer an estate to heirs without probate, although the cost can be significant — $2,000 or more.

If the condo is your only asset, a transfer-on-death deed may be a simpler, cheaper way to get the property to your heirs. Many states now offer this option, and you can often find the form by searching “transfer on death deed” and the name of your state. Your county clerk’s office may have downloadable forms as well. You’ll typically need to get the form notarized and then file it with the county property records office for the deed to be effective.

Filed Under: Inheritance, Q&A
October 9, 2023 By

Q&A: Social Security inflation adjustments

Dear Liz: When the Social Security Administration makes its cost of living adjustments, do these increases get factored into the benefit amounts for people who are not yet collecting their Social Security?

Answer: Social Security’s inflation adjustments are factored into your retirement benefits starting at age 62, whether or not you’re actually collecting checks. So there’s no reason to speed up an application just to lock in a cost of living adjustment.

Filed Under: Q&A, Social Security
October 9, 2023 By

Q&A: To shred or not to shred

Dear Liz: In a recent column, an attorney suggested that a veteran’s information can be shredded three years after death. However, surviving spouses of veterans can be eligible for benefits to cover the costs of assisted living and would need to provide that information.

Answer: That’s an excellent point. Many people aren’t aware of the “aid and attendance” benefit that can help veterans and their spouses pay for help with activities of daily living, including bathing, dressing and using the bathroom. These custodial care costs are typically not covered by Medicare.

Filed Under: Legal Matters, Medicare, Q&A, Social Security
October 9, 2023 By

Q&A: California is a community property state. How that affects your and your spouse’s need for a will

Dear Liz: Does a spouse automatically inherit everything if the other passes away without a will?

Answer: Not necessarily.

Anything that has a beneficiary designation, such as retirement accounts and life insurance, would typically pass to the person named as beneficiary even if that’s not the surviving spouse. Bank and investment accounts also may have “transfer on death” or “pay on death” beneficiaries. In many states, cars and even homes can be passed with beneficiary designations. In addition, jointly owned assets would pass to the other owner.

Other assets would pass to the deceased spouse’s survivors according to state law if there is no will or living trust. You can look up those laws by searching for the state’s name and the words “intestate succession.” If there are no children, the surviving spouse may inherit everything or may have to share with the deceased’s parents or siblings. If there are children, the surviving spouse inherits a portion of the estate with the children getting the remainder.

For example, in California — a community property state — the spouse would inherit all the community property and one half of the separate property if there is one child, and the child would inherit the rest. With two or more children, the spouse gets all of the community property and one-third of the separate property, with the children sharing the rest.

Filed Under: Couples & Money, Inheritance, Q&A