• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

  • About
  • Liz’s Books
  • Speaking
  • Disclosure
  • Contact

Liz Weston

Thursday’s need-to-know money news

July 18, 2013 By Liz Weston

Zemanta Related Posts ThumbnailAdvice on how to hire a contractor, how not to waste your summer vacation money on AMT fees, and what to do when you realize someone has hacked your email.

Top 8 Pro Tips on Hiring a Contractor
Home renovations can be much less stressful with the right contractor.

Save Money on Summer Travel by Avoiding ATM Fees
How not to waste your souvenir money on ATM fees.

9 Things to Do When Your Email is Hacked
Panicking is not one of them.

9 Ways to Save on Flights
How not to waste the aforementioned souvenir money on plane tickets.

Do Women Over 50 Need Life Insurance?
The pros and cons of purchasing a policy after 50.

Filed Under: Liz's Blog Tagged With: fraud, life insurance, saving money, summer travel

All my exes and Social Security taxes: a quiz

July 17, 2013 By Liz Weston

PolygamyThe questions I get about Social Security have made it clear how incredibly complicated this benefits system can be. So here’s a little story to illustrate one important facet of Social Security: spousal benefits.

Jack was a charming guy—maybe too charming. He enjoyed the ladies and the ladies enjoyed him, at least until they discovered they weren’t the only ladies in his life. This led to more than a little drama, and a few divorces.

Jack first married at 20, to Mary. Their marriage lasted 10 years and produced two children before breaking up. Mary went on to marry again and had a happy 30 years until her second husband died.

Jack’s second marriage was to Anne. That lasted five years. Anne never remarried.

After a few years playing the field, Jack married a third time, to Jo Beth. They separated after nine years and divorced a couple years later. Jo Beth remarried and had kids with her second husband. This marriage also ended in divorce after thirteen years.

For the past decade, Jack has been happily married to Dianne. Both are 62, but Jack has decided not to retire for a few years (all those divorces took their financial toll).

Now for the question: which of Jack’s wives qualify for Social Security spousal benefits based on Jack’s earnings record?

The answer: Mary and Jo Beth. Both were married to Jack for at least 10 years, and neither is currently married. Mary and Jo Beth also would be eligible for benefits based on their second husbands’ records (Mary as a survivor, Jo Beth as a divorced spouse) but they wouldn’t be able to claim more than one benefit. They would typically get whatever benefit is largest: the one based on Jack’s earning record, the one based on the second spouse’s earnings record, or the one based on her own earnings record.

Why wouldn’t Dianne qualify for spousal benefits, since she’s the current spouse? Because Jack hasn’t applied for his own benefits. That doesn’t matter to the former wives, since the ex’s cooperation isn’t required for them to start getting spousal benefits. The ex merely has to be old enough to qualify for retirement benefits (which you typically are at age 62.). If you’re currently married, though, you can’t start spousal benefits unless your “earner” has applied.

Jack could allow Dianne to start benefits with a technique called “file and suspend,” in which he would file for benefits and then immediately suspend his application. That would allow his own benefit to continue to grow while allowing her to get checks based on his earnings record.

So conceivably, three women and Jack himself eventually could be earning benefits based solely on Jack’s earnings records. The amounts the women get wouldn’t affect or reduce each other’s benefit, or his.

Most people can’t squeeze quite that much mileage out of the Social Security taxes they pay. But since spousal benefits could result in a bigger check than you might get on your own, they’re worth knowing about.

 

Filed Under: Liz's Blog Tagged With: divorced spousal benefits, Social Security, Social Security benefits, spousal benefits

Wednesday’s need-to-know money news

July 17, 2013 By Liz Weston

Doctor feesNegotiating medical bills, why a financial power of attorney is a must, and the pros and cons of “pocket listings”.

Is It Ever Too Late to Negotiate a Medical Bill?
How soon do you need to question that eight dollar aspirin?

Why You Need a Financial Power of Attorney
Preparing for the unexpected is a necessity.

Poll: Just 32% of Americans Keep a Household Budget
Which percentage do you fall in to?

How to Pay Less for High-End Homeowners Insurance
High-End home insurance doesn’t need to break the bank.

Should You Sell a House Under the Radar?
Is the privacy worth the price?

Filed Under: Liz's Blog Tagged With: budgets, Estate Planning, home sales, homeowners insurance, medical bills

Three ways to retire poor

July 16, 2013 By Liz Weston

Will Work for FoodI hear from a lot of people who think they’re doing the right things with their money—little realizing that they’re impoverishing their future selves. Three behaviors you’re most likely to regret later:

Putting off saving for retirement. Some people spend every dime they make, while others delay saving while they pursue other goals that seem more worthy, like saving for a home or paying off debt. The reality is that retirement savings opportunities are “use it or lose it”—you can’t get back the company matches, tax breaks or (most important) the power of compounding if you don’t get those contributions into your account. Compounding is so powerful, in fact, that it gets harder and harder to catch up the older you get…until it gets impossible. The smarter solution: Start saving for retirement from your first job, and don’t stop.

Cashing out your retirement when you leave a job. The next most widespread and destructive behavior is tapping into what you do manage to save. About 42% of those who lost their jobs in 2010 cashed out their retirement plans, which is about the same percentage as before the recession, according to an Aon report. More than half of those in their 20s cashed out. Not only do you incur taxes and penalties that eat up 25% or more of your withdrawal, but you lose all the future tax-deferred compounding on that money—which means those in their 20s are hurt even more by cash-outs than those who do it later. (Figure every $1,000 you withdraw in your 20s will cost you $20,000 or more in lost future retirement income.) The smarter solution: Leave your retirement money for retirement. If you can’t or don’t want to leave your balance when you leave your job, roll it into your new employer’s plan or into an IRA.

Grabbing your Social Security benefit early. Social Security will be a big part of most people’s retirements, but too few people understand how much they’re hurting themselves—or their loved ones—when they apply early and lock in a permanently reduced check. It’s not just that you’re likely to live past the “breakeven point” when, mathematically, waiting until full retirement age pays off in terms of total benefits. More importantly, you may be cutting yourself off from strategies that would maximize your lifetime benefits and leaving your surviving spouse with a bigger check. Take a minute to read AARP’s excellent primer on the subject, “How to Maximize Your Social Security Benefits,” and use the free calculator at T. Rowe Price to help you understand the impact of different strategies. (If you want more freedom to customize a tool, www.maximizemysocialsecurity.com gives you that for $40.) The smarter solution: View Social Security as a kind of longevity insurance that helps protect you against the possibility of outliving your savings.

 

Filed Under: Liz's Blog Tagged With: Retirement, Social Security, Social Security benefits calculator, timing Social Security benefits

Tuesday’s need-to-know money news

July 16, 2013 By Liz Weston

Smart PhoneHow to avoid mistakes with your credit cards, plan a cheap summer vacation and get personal finance advice in the palm of your hand.

Best Personal Finance Apps of 2013

How your smartphone can make your wallet smarter.

Nine Stupid Things You’re Probably Doing With Your Credit Card
Innocent mistakes can lead to serious problems.

How to Plan a Cheaper Summer Vacation
There’s still time to get away on the cheap.

Good News: Homeowner’s Insurance Covers a Sharknado
Just like an asteroid, falling sharks are covered.

Filed Under: Liz's Blog Tagged With: Credit Cards, homeowners insurance, money apps, summer vacations, vacations

Is a Roth worth losing a tax deduction?

July 16, 2013 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: Everyone talks about Roth IRAs and how beneficial they are. But I am self-employed, my husband contributes 16% toward his 401(k), our house is paid off, and we no longer have dependents to deduct on our 1040 tax return. My contribution to my traditional IRA is the only tax deduction we have left. Should I consider a Roth anyway? If so, why?

Answer: A Roth would give you a tax-free bucket of money to spend in retirement. That would give you more flexibility to manage your tax bill than if all your money were in 401(k)s and traditional IRAs, where your withdrawals typically are taxable. Also, there are no minimum distribution requirements for a Roth. If you don’t need the money, you can pass it on to your heirs. Other retirement funds require you to start taking money out after you turn 701/2. If you need to crack into your nest egg early, on the other hand, you’ll face no penalties or taxes when you withdraw amounts equal to your original contributions.

So is it worth giving up your IRA tax deduction now to get those benefits? If you have a ton of money saved, you want to leave a legacy for your kids and you’re likely to be in the same or a higher tax bracket in retirement, the answer may be yes. If you’re like most people, though, your tax bracket will drop once you retire. That means you’d be giving up a valuable tax break now for a tax benefit that may be worth less in the future.

You may not have to make a choice, however, between tax breaks now and tax breaks later if you have more than $5,500 (the current annual IRA limit) to contribute. Since you’re self-employed, you may be able to put up to $51,000 in a tax-deductible Simplified Employee Pension or SEP-IRA. At the same time, you could contribute up to $5,500 to a Roth (assuming your income as a married couple is within or below the phase-out range for 2013 of $178,000 to $188,000).

This would be a great issue to discuss with a tax pro.

Filed Under: Q&A, Retirement Tagged With: IRA, IRA deductibility, Retirement, Roth IRA, SEP

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 741
  • Page 742
  • Page 743
  • Page 744
  • Page 745
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 789
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Copyright © 2025 · Ask Liz Weston 2.0 On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in