• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

  • About
  • Liz’s Books
  • Speaking
  • Disclosure
  • Contact

Social Security

Q&A: Bowing out of trustee duty

March 17, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My husband agreed to serve as successor trustee for his brother’s living trust several years ago. My brother-in-law also added me as a backup. My brother-in-law’s financial situation has gotten very complicated and we would like to be removed as trustees. How do we go about this removal? My husband has asked his brother to see the lawyer who drafted the trust so they can both discuss the change, but his brother has ignored this request for several months.

Answer: A successor trustee’s role is similar to that of an executor. Both are charged with settling someone’s estate. Being asked to serve is an honor, since the person choosing you is saying they expect you will act with honor, integrity and prudence. But you can’t be forced to serve, even if you initially said yes.

Your brother-in-law may have already named other alternatives. If not, a court can appoint someone. This would undermine one of the benefits of a living trust, which is to avoid a court’s involvement in settling an estate. But that’s ultimately your brother-in-law’s problem to solve, not yours.

Before you bail, though, understand that as successor trustee or executor, you don’t have to be a legal or tax expert. You can use the estate’s resources to hire people to help you — and in all but the simplest estates, you probably should.

Of course, financial complications can lead to other complications — family fights, disgruntled heirs and so on. You may no longer have the energy or willingness to face such difficulties. If that’s the case, you’ve given your brother-in-law the heads-up he needs to make other arrangements.

Filed Under: Estate planning, Q&A, Social Security Tagged With: Estate Planning, executor, living trust, revocable living trust, successor trustee

Q&A: No more windfall elimination provision and government pension offset

March 17, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My husband worked for the postal service for over 30 years and retired with a pension. He does not have enough years working in the private sector to qualify for Social Security. Since we now have the Social Security Fairness Act, is he eligible to receive a percentage of my Social Security? I know spouses who never worked and never contributed are able to receive Social Security payments based on their spouse’s earnings.

Answer: If you’ve already started Social Security and he’s at least 62, he should now be able to claim a spousal benefit based on your work record.

The Social Security Fairness Act ended the windfall elimination provision and the government pension offset. These two provisions had reduced or eliminated benefits for over 3 million people who received pensions from jobs that didn’t pay into Social Security. Those affected will see their benefits increase or receive benefits for the first time, plus they’ll receive a one-time retroactive payment reflecting the increase dating back to January 2024.

Social Security started adjusting benefits and making retroactive payments at the end of February. The agency says most affected people will see their adjusted payments starting in April, since benefits are paid one month behind.

If your husband never applied for spousal benefits, he can do so now. If he applied in the past and was denied, he could get his first payment next month as long as the agency has his current bank deposit information on file.

Filed Under: Q&A, Retirement, Social Security Tagged With: government pension offset, GPO, Social Security Fairness Act, WEP, windfall elimination provision

Q&A: Do retirement accounts affect survivor benefits?

March 17, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I was 36 with two young children, ages 6 and 2, when my husband died. We are collecting Social Security survivor benefits. I work only part time since my kids are so young. He left two IRAs: one that named me as a beneficiary and one that didn’t name anyone. I understand I can treat the first one as if it were my own, and put off taking withdrawals. The second one must be drained within five years. Will the withdrawals from the second account affect my gross income and ability to collect our monthly Social Security benefit?

Answer: The withdrawals will be considered taxable income, but the money shouldn’t affect your survivor benefits.

Social Security benefits received before your full retirement age are subject to the earnings test, which withholds $1 of benefits for every $2 you earn over a certain amount, which in 2025 is $23,400. The earnings test includes wages and self-employment income, but doesn’t include withdrawals from retirement accounts.

Filed Under: Q&A, Retirement Savings, Social Security, Taxes Tagged With: earnings test, Social Security survivor benefits, survivor benefits

Q&A: Spouse gets the larger of two Social Security benefits, not both

March 10, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: Your recent column on the divorced couple where the ex-wife can apply for Social Security benefits has me wondering about my own benefits. I’m 60 and my husband is 79. Can I get his Social Security benefits, and if so, when should I apply? I am working and have worked all my adult life. He has an ex and was married to her for 11 years, so she is getting his and he is getting his. Do I qualify for his and also my own?

Answer: To repeat, Social Security is typically “either/or,” not “both.” When you apply for Social Security, your own retirement benefit will be compared with a spousal benefit based on your husband’s earnings record. You’ll get the larger of the two benefits. The spousal benefit can be up to 50% of your husband’s benefit at his full retirement age, not the amount he’s currently getting.

You can apply as early as age 62, but that means accepting a permanently reduced benefit. Also, early benefits will be subject to the earnings test, which withholds $1 for every $2 earned over a certain limit, which in 2025 is $23,400.

You won’t face the earnings test if you apply after reaching your full retirement age, which is 67. If you delay filing, your own benefit will continue to grow. It maxes out at age 70.

Figuring out the best time to apply can be complicated. AARP has a free calculator that may help, or you can use the more sophisticated paid versions at Maximize My Social Security.

Filed Under: Q&A, Social Security Tagged With: claiming strategies, earnings test, Social Security, Social Security claiming strategies, spousal benefit

Q&A: Three marriages, but only one Social Security benefit

March 3, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I was married for 10 years before divorcing. My second marriage also ended in divorce. I married for the third time and was widowed. I am collecting a survivor benefit. Am I also entitled to receive a benefit from my first marriage of 10 years? My first husband is still living.

Answer: Social Security is basically “either/or,” not “and.” If you qualify for two benefits, you typically get the larger check — not both.

Since you are currently unmarried, your ex is still living and your first marriage lasted 10 years, you may be eligible for a divorced spousal benefit. That can be up to 50% of your first husband’s benefit at his full retirement age.

You would only receive that benefit, however, if it were larger than the survivor benefit you’re currently receiving. Survivor benefits are up to 100% of the late worker’s check, so your first divorced spousal benefit would have to be substantially larger than what your late husband received to make a switch. You can call Social Security at (800) 772-1213 to inquire.

Filed Under: Divorce & Money, Q&A, Social Security Tagged With: divorced spousal benefits, divorced survivor benefits, Social Security, spousal benefits, survivor benefits

Q&A: A divorced couple considers retying the knot to maximize Social Security payments

February 10, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I was married for 33 years and divorced 4 years ago. We have reconciled and are now back living together as a couple, but have not remarried. I’m 68, and my former spouse is 63. Neither of us is drawing Social Security, but we are now considering applying. Will she be able to draw more if we were to get remarried? It seems as if half of my payment will be more than what she’d get on her own. Also, when should I start drawing my benefit to maximize the payment?

Answer: Let’s start with the simpler of the two answers. Your benefit maxes out at age 70, so waiting until then to apply is usually the right strategy. Maximizing your check also maximizes the survivor benefit, or divorced survivor benefit, your partner might eventually receive.

The amount your partner would get as a spouse or a divorced spouse would be the same: up to 50% of your benefit at your full retirement age, assuming that amount is greater than her own benefit. To qualify for a divorced spousal benefit, the marriage must have lasted at least 10 years and two years must have passed since the divorce.

There’s one crucial difference between spousal and divorced spousal benefits, however. If you remarry one another, she will have to wait for you to apply for Social Security before she can qualify for a spousal benefit. If you don’t remarry, she doesn’t have to wait. A divorced spousal benefit can start as early as age 62, as long as the ex-spouse is also at least 62.

That doesn’t mean your partner should rush out to apply. Applying early — before her full retirement age of 67 — means settling for a smaller check.

Filed Under: Divorce & Money, Q&A, Social Security Tagged With: divorced spousal benefits, divorced spouse benefits, divorced survivor benefit, survivor benefit, survivor benefits

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 35
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Copyright © 2025 · Ask Liz Weston 2.0 On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in