Retirement Savings

Q&A: Maxing out retirement contributions? Beware of future tax issues

May 19, 2025 By Liz Weston Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I work for a local government and am trying to decide when to retire. I will receive a pension and have put away as much money as I could afford in my 457 deferred compensation plan. I invested it in a Standard & Poor’s 500 index fund that has performed well and is now worth $1.3 million. I also have a non-sheltered brokerage account of seven figures and no debt. Last year, I contributed vacation time and money to maximize my 457 contribution of $46,000. This year (and next unless I retire), I am likewise maximizing my contribution and contributing $46,000 each year. But periodically our monthly expenditures have exceeded my monthly income after the contribution and I have had to dip into the brokerage account to make up the difference. Does that make financial sense to do if needed or should I consider scaling back my contribution?

Answer: When you’re behind on saving for retirement, maximizing your contributions to tax-deferred plans in your final working years can be a smart move.

You, however, have a large amount of savings as well as a pension, so you may face a different problem: higher future taxes. Diligent savers can find themselves pushed into a higher tax bracket when required minimum distributions (RMDs) kick in. RMDs used to begin at age 70-½, but now start at age 73 for those born between 1951 through 1959 and will rise to 75 for those born in 1960 and later.

Many people with large tax-deferred retirement accounts can reduce their lifetime tax bills by converting at least some of the funds to a Roth IRA. Conversions are taxable, but Roths don’t have required minimum distributions and future withdrawals from Roths can be tax free. Conversions can affect other aspects of your retirement, such as Medicare premiums, so you’ll want sound tax advice before moving forward. You also may want to consult a fee-only financial planner who can review your overall financial situation and help you shape your retirement income plan.

Q&A: Required withdrawals could change Social Security taxation

May 4, 2025 By Liz Weston 2 Comments

Dear Liz: Is it true that when you start your required minimum distributions from 401(k) and 403(b) plans, you give up your monthly Social Security payment? I plan to start RMDs next year at age 71 thinking I will get less money for more years.

Answer: Your withdrawals from retirement plans won’t reduce your Social Security directly. The additional income could, however, make more of your Social Security payment taxable.

Taxes on Social Security are based on something called “combined income,” which is your adjusted gross income plus any nontaxable interest you earned plus half of your Social Security income. If you’re single and your combined income is between $25,000 and $34,000, then up to half of your Social Security payment may be taxable. If combined income is over $34,000, up to 85% may be taxable. For people who are married filing jointly, the bracket for up to 50% taxation is $32,000 and $44,000 while combined income over $44,000 can trigger up to 85% taxation.

To be clear, this does not mean that 50% or more of your benefit goes to taxes. It means that 50% or more of your benefit may be subject to your income tax bracket.

Q&A: Planning for retirement in a volatile market

April 7, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I have a retirement account at work and a stock portfolio. Both are down significantly this year and I’m tired of losing money. What are the safest options now?

Answer: Before the “what” you need to think about the “why” and the “when.” Why are you investing in the first place? And when will you need this money?

If you’re investing for retirement, you may not need the money for years or decades. Even when you’re retired, you’ll likely need to keep a portion of your money in stocks if you want to keep ahead of inflation. The price for that inflation-beating power is suffering through occasional downturns.

You won’t suffer those downturns in “safer” investments such as U.S. Treasuries or FDIC-insured savings accounts, but you also won’t achieve the growth you likely need to meet your retirement goals. In fact, you may be losing money after inflation and taxes are factored in.

Also keep in mind that if you sell during downturns, you’ve locked in your losses. Any money that’s not invested won’t be able to participate in the inevitable rebounds after downturns. Plus, you may be generating a tax bill, since a stock that’s down for the year may still be worth more than when you bought it. (You don’t have to worry about taxes with most retirement accounts until you withdraw the money, but selling stocks in other accounts can generate capital gains.)

The exception to all this is if you have money in stocks that you’re likely to need within five years. If that’s the case, the money should be moved to investments that preserve principal so the cash will be there when you need it.

Q&A: Be careful when commingling old and new funds in a Roth IRA

February 24, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I am a stay-at-home mom of 15 years who has a Roth IRA account from working before marriage. I will start working again soon and would like to know how to best protect my separate property from my future community property earnings. Should I start a new Roth IRA instead of adding to my existing one so as to not commingle the funds?

Answer: That could be a smart idea.

In general, assets acquired before marriage are considered separate property. But that status can change if post-marriage funds are added into pre-marriage accounts. The rules vary by state, but making retirement contributions to a new account can help keep the lines between separate and marital property from getting blurred.

Q&A: When it comes to Roth IRAs, 59½ and 5 are the magic numbers

February 24, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: You recently answered a question about Roth conversions, saying that each conversion triggered its own five-year holding period. It was my understanding that after age 59½, the five-year rule doesn’t apply and earnings aren’t taxed.

Answer: The rules for Roth IRAs can be complicated, and they’re different for accounts that you fund directly versus those that are funded through conversions.

If you contribute directly to a Roth, you can withdraw your contributions any time without tax or penalty. You can withdraw earnings tax free if you’re 59½ or older and the account has been open for at least five years.

But as mentioned in the previous column, the five-year holding period applies to each conversion you make from another retirement account into a Roth. What goes away after age 59½ is the 10% penalty for early withdrawal, says Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting. Earnings withdrawn before five years can be taxed as income. However, it’s assumed that any withdrawals are principal first, so you’d have to withdraw the entire conversion amount before earnings would be taxed.

Luscombe notes that some people set up separate accounts for each conversion to make tracking the five-year periods easier. That could be especially helpful if they plan to make substantial withdrawals that could include earnings before the last conversion amount hits its five-year mark. Once all the five-year periods have expired, the accounts can be combined into one.