Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Q&A

Q&A: Trusts and taxes

By

Dear Liz: My parents set up a family trust, which my brother and I have now inherited but not fully distributed. Included in that trust was the understanding that $130,000 would go to my daughter who is now 23. She has not received any of the money yet but would like to receive it within the next year for a down payment on a house. Would it be better to give her half the money this calendar year and half next year, or give her everything at once? I’m thinking there may be tax breaks for first-time home buyers that would offset the tax burden that a sudden increase in income from the inheritance would cause. She has been living on her own for several years and has a full-time job earning about $52,000 per year. She is already taking advantage of her company’s 401(k) match.

Answer: The inheritance won’t be considered income and isn’t taxable as such. Of course, any money the inheritance earns would be taxable. So if your daughter parks the money in a high-yield savings account while she looks for a home, she would pay income tax on any interest earned.

There also isn’t currently a first-time home buyer federal tax credit, although many states have various programs to help people buy homes. These typically do have income limits, although, again, the inheritance itself wouldn’t be considered part of her income.

Before you distribute the money, however, get clear on what exactly the “understanding” is about this money. If the trust clearly states this amount goes to your daughter, that’s one thing. If this money has been allocated to you, however, and you’re complying with your parents’ unwritten wish, you may have to file a gift tax return when the money is distributed. (Gift taxes won’t be due unless you give away millions in your lifetime.) An estate planning attorney can advise you.

Q&A: Married more than once? Here’s what that means for Social Security survivor benefits

By

Dear Liz: I’m in a second marriage that’s lasted 10 years. Is my wife fully entitled to my Social Security after I die? My first wife and I were married for 19 years. Is my ex entitled to any of it?

Answer: Both your current spouse and your ex could be entitled to survivor benefits based on your work record. Typically someone must be married nine months to qualify for survivor benefits on a current spouse’s record. If the spouses divorced, the marriage must have lasted 10 years. Each survivor benefit can be up to 100% of your benefit. The amount may be reduced if the women start benefits before their own full retirement age, but they don’t have to share — the amount isn’t reduced because you’ve had more than one spouse.

Q&A: Home sales and taxes

By

Dear Liz: My in-laws passed away earlier this year within months of each other. Their primary asset, part of their living trust, is their home, worth close to $1 million. There is a reverse mortgage of about $332,000 that will be paid off once the house sells. Will capital gains tax apply to the four beneficiaries? Or do we get to take advantage of the step up in cost basis? The house is in escrow right now. I don’t think the house has gone up in value since the last death.

Answer: The home will get the favorable step up in tax basis. That means the beneficiaries won’t have to pay capital gains tax on all the appreciation that happened during the parents’ lifetime.

Q&A: So you’ve got a friend spewing investment advice from social media. Here are some grains of salt

By

Dear Liz: I am in my early 60s and have a friend the same age who keeps telling me to invest in companies which she has found from looking at YouTube videos. She says that she picks stocks by seeing which companies are repeated over and over again in different videos. She claims she is making a 400% return. She tells me I am losing money by investing in safer products, such as certificates of deposit. First of all, is this a good idea to invest everything in stocks, when one is in their mid-60s to 70s, when retirement is on the horizon? Also, neither she nor I are working full time at the moment, so, the risk is great if the market goes up and down and the value of a portfolio changes. I’ve seen my retirement funds drop the last few years, even though they are ever so slowly creeping back up. Finally, what is your opinion on getting financial advice or stock picks from social media platforms?

Answer: Perhaps your friend is the next Warren Buffett. More likely she’s exaggerating her results or simply hasn’t dealt with a down market yet. Few investors can consistently produce outsize returns over time, especially when they’re essentially picking stocks at random.

In answer to your first question: It’s rarely smart to invest everything in any one thing, whether it’s stocks, bonds, real estate, certificates of deposit or alpaca farms. Diversification helps investors reduce risk. If one type of investment is performing poorly, another may be doing better.

Having some money in “safe” investments may be prudent, but you’re typically losing ground to inflation with low-return CDs or Treasurys. Most people will need to have at least some portion of their portfolios in stocks, before and after retirement, if they want to outpace inflation.

Q&A: Social Security survivor benefits

By

Dear Liz: My husband died 10 years ago. He had a good salary for many years. I just turned 60 and have been told that I may now claim Social Security benefits as his widow. He has a minor child from another relationship. If I claim survivor benefits now, will it diminish the benefits his child now receives?

Answer: No. If you’re still working, however, your benefit will be reduced by $1 for every $2 you earn over a certain limit, which in 2023 is $21,240. The earnings test disappears once you reach full retirement age, which is 67 for people born in 1960 and later.

Also, you’re allowed to switch from a survivor benefit to your own and vice versa. That flexibility is unusual, and could allow you to let your own benefit grow until it maxes out at age 70. You may want to consult a fee-only financial planner or a Social Security claiming strategy site for advice.

Q&A: Don’t try evading Roth IRA requirements

By

Dear Liz: My son is a student. He would like to maximize his Roth IRA at the annual $7,000 limit and has the money in savings to do so. However, his income from odd jobs, paid in cash, will probably be less than the $7,000 required to make this maximum contribution. Can he report additional income on his income tax beyond what he earned, pay the associated additional income taxes and thus meet the $7,000 income requirement?

Answer: Your son’s enthusiasm for retirement savings is commendable, but filing fraudulent tax returns is not. He can’t contribute more than he legitimately earns.