Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Insurance

Q&A: These major financial decisions shouldn’t be DIY projects. Talk to an expert!

By

Dear Liz: I anticipate being dead soon (cancer). I have established an irrevocable trust for my 8-year-old child, with my 47-year-old wife as the trustee. With respect to taxes and other issues and naming beneficiaries, what is the optimal strategy regarding my child for life insurance and traditional and Roth IRAs? My wife will get the 401(k).

Answer: The best person to answer those questions is the estate planning attorney you (presumably) used to create the irrevocable trust. Estate planning should not be a do-it-yourself activity, particularly when minor children are involved. The wrong plan could give too much too soon to your child, or tie up the money too long. You also don’t want to unreasonably stint your wife in your efforts to preserve money for your child. Also, the optimal strategies for tax purposes may not be the best for your family’s situation.

For example, the best way to minimize taxes may be to leave all the retirement money to your wife. Spouses who inherit retirement funds have the option of treating the accounts as their own. That means your wife wouldn’t have to begin required minimum distributions from the 401(k) or the traditional IRA until she’s 75. (The current RMD age is 73, but it rises to 75 for people born in 1960 and later.) She would not have to take distributions from a Roth IRA she inherits from you.

Non-spouse heirs generally have to drain retirement accounts within 10 years. Minors who inherit retirement funds don’t have to take the first distribution until they turn 21, but then the accounts must be emptied within 10 years.

Life insurance proceeds typically aren’t taxable, or payable to a minor child. But you can create a trust to receive and dole out the proceeds to your child. Your estate planning attorney can help you set this up.

Q&A: A parent had life insurance, but the companies are gone. What to do?

By

Dear Liz: My mother died last year. I discovered she had two old life insurance policies written by companies that no longer exist. How can I determine which modern insurance company is responsible for policies written by these old companies? How can I submit a claim? My mother was born in 1932. The first policy began 1939 for $350. The second began in 1943 for $600.

Answer: It’s not a given that a modern insurer still has these policies, but it’s possible. You can start by entering the old companies’ names in an internet search engine to see whether new owners are mentioned in the results. If that doesn’t work, contact the insurance department in the state where the old company was headquartered because it will have records of mergers or other changes.

If the company went bankrupt, you’ll need to consult the guaranty association in the state where your mother lived. State guaranty associations protect policyholders when an insurer defaults or becomes insolvent. The National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Assns. has a search tool you can use to find the correct association.

Another option is to check the life insurance policy locator service offered by the National Assn. of Insurance Commissioners at https://eapps.naic.org/life-policy-locator/#/welcome. You’ll need to input your mother’s Social Security number as well as her dates of birth and death.

Also check the unclaimed property offices of any states where she lived. You’ll find links at unclaimed.org.

Q&A: Shake, rattle and … roll the dice without earthquake insurance?

By

Dear Liz: I live in Southern California and my homeowners insurance renews at the end of August. Should I consider buying earthquake insurance?

Answer: Insurance is meant to protect against catastrophic losses that we couldn’t easily pay out of pocket.

If you don’t have much equity in your home, or you’re willing to walk away from the equity you do have, then you can forgo earthquake insurance. Otherwise, you need the coverage.

The same is true for flood insurance, which is also not covered by the typical homeowners policy.

Q&A: Should your retirement savings plan include life insurance? Here are some pros and cons

By

Dear Liz: Are indexed universal life insurance products worthwhile, and how do they compare to a Roth IRA?

Answer: Both offer the potential for tax-free distributions in retirement, but indexed universal life insurance is a complex product with high expenses that’s not a good fit for most investors.

With a Roth IRA, virtually all of your money can go toward your retirement investment. (Most investments have fees of some kind, but you can minimize those by using exchange traded funds or low-cost index funds.) With permanent life insurance, some of your money goes toward paying premiums for the death benefit and other administrative expenses, including commissions for the person who sells you the policy. The remaining cash can be invested in accounts that are tied to the performance of a stock market index. Your principal is guaranteed, but the amount you earn is subject to caps.

Financial planners generally recommend that you first max out other retirement savings options, such as 401(k)s and IRAs, before considering investing through a life insurance policy. Also, you should be someone who needs permanent life insurance — the kind that is meant to cover you for the rest of your life. (Term insurance, by contrast, is a much less expensive option meant to cover you for a set term, such as 20 years.)

Some people do need permanent coverage. Their estates may be large enough to incur estate taxes that they want to pay with insurance, for example. Or they may have a special needs child who will require ongoing support. If you need permanent coverage, consider hiring a fee-only financial planner to help you sort through your options.

Q&A: Vehicle insurance coverage limits

By

Dear Liz: You recently answered a question from someone who lent a van to a friend for more than a year. You mentioned the borrower “may have benefited from free insurance coverage if you continued to pay those premiums.” Some insurance companies limit the time they extend coverage when a car is driven by someone other than the owner or immediate family. Our insurance has a four-month limit.

Answer: That’s a good point. Insurers often require that anyone who regularly uses a vehicle be added to the insurance policy as a driver. In addition, someone who borrows a vehicle and who is otherwise uninsured might want to consider getting a non-owner insurance policy. This wouldn’t cover damage to the vehicle but would provide liability coverage in case of an accident.

Q&A: Old uncashed insurance policies

By

Dear Liz: What advice can you provide to people when they stumble on old life insurance policies that may never have been cashed in?

Answer: My siblings and I have personal experience with this after coming across two policies in our late father’s papers. We learned one policy had indeed been cashed in, but the second — purchased in the 1930s, with a face value of $5,000 — was still in effect.

You typically can use a search engine to determine if the insurer is still in business or if it has changed its name or merged with another company. (Not surprisingly, the insurer that issued the 1930s policy had been involved in several mergers in the intervening decades, but it took just seconds for us to find the current incarnation.) If you’re having trouble tracking down the company, contact the insurance regulator in the state where the insurer was originally located.

Once you have the current insurer name and contact information, you can call and ask if the policy is still in force. If the policy has value, the insurer can instruct you how to make a claim.