Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Taxes

Q&A: How to avoid or reduce taxes on required minimum distributions

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I’m confused about required minimum distributions from my retirement accounts. I’d like to avoid taxes on my withdrawals, but it seems there is no way to avoid them. Please give me some guidance.

Answer: If you got a deduction for contributing this money, and you want to keep the funds you’re required to withdraw, then yes, you have to pay taxes on these distributions.

Required minimum distributions from retirement accounts currently have to start at age 73. There are a few exceptions. Roth accounts don’t offer deductions on contributions and also don’t have RMDs. You can postpone RMDs from a workplace plan such as a 401(k) or 403(b) as long as you’re still working for the employer that sponsors the plan, the plan offers this “still working” option, and you don’t own 5% or more of the company.

If you don’t need the money, you could consider donating your required minimum distribution to charity. Known as “qualified charitable distributions,” these donations can start as early as age 70½. As long as the money goes directly from an IRA to a qualified nonprofit, you can avoid paying taxes on the distribution. For 2025, the maximum qualified charitable distribution is $108,000 per individual. (You can’t make a qualified charitable distribution from a workplace plan, but you can roll some or all of the account into an IRA and make the donation from there.)

Sometimes RMDs can be large enough to catapult savers into a higher tax bracket and trigger higher Medicare premiums. If that’s the case, and you’re still a few years away from starting RMDs, consider talking to a tax pro about ways to manage the tax bill. Starting distributions early or converting some funds to a Roth IRA might be options.

Q&A: Only married couples in community property states get this tax benefit

By

Dear Liz: I own a house with my longtime boyfriend. If one of us dies, how does the capital gains step-up affect the other?

Answer: The deceased partner’s share of the home will get a new basis for tax purposes. The survivor’s share will not.

Tax basis helps determine how much of a capital gains tax bill you might face when you sell a home or any other asset that gained value over time. Your basis is generally what you paid for the home, plus qualifying improvements.

Inherited assets typically get a step-up in tax basis to their current market value, which means that no one has to pay taxes on the appreciation that occurred during the original owner’s lifetime.

If you were married and living in a community property state such as California, then the entire house could get stepped up to the current market value when the first spouse dies. This is known as the double step up. But this applies only to married couples in community property states. Unmarried couples in community property states and couples in other states don’t get this benefit.

Q&A: Inherited IRA could increase tax bill and Medicare premiums

By

Dear Liz: If someone inherits my retirement account, is there any way they can avoid having their Medicare premiums increased for one year?

Answer: A large-enough retirement account could affect their Medicare premiums for up to 10 years, not just one.

Normally inheritances aren’t taxable, but retirement accounts are the exception. Withdrawals from inherited retirement accounts are usually taxable as income, and most non-spouse inheritors must drain a retirement account within 10 years. Withdrawals from inherited Roth accounts aren’t taxable, but the accounts still must be drained by the inheritor within a decade.

If the inheritor is on Medicare, taxable withdrawals could boost income enough to increase their Medicare premiums, thanks to the income-related monthly adjustment amounts (IRMAA). This surcharge starts once modified adjusted gross income exceeds certain amounts, which in 2025 is $106,000 for single filers and $212,000 for married couples filing jointly.

Anyone who inherits a retirement plan should get advice from a tax pro, but that’s particularly important when withdrawals might affect tax brackets and Medicare premiums. The pro can help determine how quickly or slowly the money should be withdrawn to maximize how much the inheritor gets to keep.

Q&A: Maxing out retirement contributions? Beware of future tax issues

By

Dear Liz: I work for a local government and am trying to decide when to retire. I will receive a pension and have put away as much money as I could afford in my 457 deferred compensation plan. I invested it in a Standard & Poor’s 500 index fund that has performed well and is now worth $1.3 million. I also have a non-sheltered brokerage account of seven figures and no debt. Last year, I contributed vacation time and money to maximize my 457 contribution of $46,000. This year (and next unless I retire), I am likewise maximizing my contribution and contributing $46,000 each year. But periodically our monthly expenditures have exceeded my monthly income after the contribution and I have had to dip into the brokerage account to make up the difference. Does that make financial sense to do if needed or should I consider scaling back my contribution?

Answer: When you’re behind on saving for retirement, maximizing your contributions to tax-deferred plans in your final working years can be a smart move.

You, however, have a large amount of savings as well as a pension, so you may face a different problem: higher future taxes. Diligent savers can find themselves pushed into a higher tax bracket when required minimum distributions (RMDs) kick in. RMDs used to begin at age 70-½, but now start at age 73 for those born between 1951 through 1959 and will rise to 75 for those born in 1960 and later.

Many people with large tax-deferred retirement accounts can reduce their lifetime tax bills by converting at least some of the funds to a Roth IRA. Conversions are taxable, but Roths don’t have required minimum distributions and future withdrawals from Roths can be tax free. Conversions can affect other aspects of your retirement, such as Medicare premiums, so you’ll want sound tax advice before moving forward. You also may want to consult a fee-only financial planner who can review your overall financial situation and help you shape your retirement income plan.

Q&A: Future mate hasn’t filed tax returns. Am I liable?

By

Dear Liz: I’m engaged to someone who just confessed that they have not filed tax returns for the last several years. How do we fix this? If they owe a lot of money, could the IRS come after me if we’re married?

Answer: Technically, debts incurred before marriage are considered separate. But there are many ways premarital debt can affect postmarital life.

If you live in a community property state, for example, creditors could come after jointly owned assets if your spouse fails to pay what they owe. Your spouse’s debt could affect how much you two can borrow if you want to apply for a mortgage or other joint obligation. And the money your spouse uses to pay off the debt isn’t available for other uses that could benefit both of you. That could include everything from paying bills to going on vacation to saving for retirement.

The IRS is not a good creditor to have, in case you had any doubts. The agency has many enforcement powers, such as withholding refunds, taking part of someone’s paycheck and seizing property to pay debts. Consider working with a tax pro to get the missing returns filed as quickly as possible. The IRS also offers payment plans for those who can’t pay in full.

Inheriting stocks after a parent’s death resets the cost basis

By

Dear Liz: I am a beneficiary of my father’s brokerage account. Upon his death, the brokerage company closed his account and transferred all of the equities to me in a new account. How will I know the cost basis for capital gains purposes when I sell the stocks?

Answer: You will use the value of the stocks on the day of your father’s death as the new tax basis. This is known as a “step up” in basis, since typically the fair market value at death is higher than the original basis, or what your dad paid for the stocks. Any appreciation that occurred during his lifetime won’t be taxed, but you would be subject to capital gains tax on any appreciation that occurs after that date.