Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Q&A

Q&A: Could spouse’s early start stunt Social Security survivor benefit?

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: My husband and I plan to delay taking Social Security retirement benefits until the higher-earning spouse is 70. This is to ensure the highest possible survivor benefit. However, the lower-earning spouse will be turning 62 at the same time that the higher earning spouse turns 70. We are concerned that the lower-earning spouse’s future survivor benefit will be reduced if the lower earner starts benefits early. When would be the best time for the lower-earning spouse to take retirement benefits and ensure that the survivor’s benefit remains the same?

Answer: The lower earner won’t reduce the survivor benefit by starting early, but they will permanently reduce their own benefit or any spousal benefit they’re owed. Most people are better off waiting at least until their full retirement age to start Social Security benefits so they can avoid this reduction.

Q&A: How long should I wait before withdrawing from my IRA?

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: My husband and I disagree over when to use pre-tax monies (e.g., IRAs). He’ll be 69, and I’ll be 67 in the coming year, so we aren’t required to take distributions yet, and he isn’t starting Social Security until 70.

He insists it’s better to use our regular assets to live on and let the IRA monies grow as long as possible. I’d rather save the regular assets (many of which have high capital gains) and leave them to our adult kids after we die.

The pre-tax funds are now $4 million. Now that our kids would have to empty the IRA accounts within 10 years (no more stretch IRAs), doesn’t that make it more reasonable to start using some of those funds now? I’m assuming the IRA balances would still be significant, even after taking required minimum distributions. I’ve gotten most of my IRA funds converted to Roth so we don’t have to take RMDs on that money, but he won’t consider conversions. Is he right about limiting our expenditures to money from the regular brokerage account? Once we start Social Security and RMDs, we’ll have to pay more taxes on any withdrawals compared to now.

Answer: A lot of savers got the message pounded into their heads that retirement accounts should be left to grow tax-deferred as long as possible. The idea was that you’d be in a lower tax bracket when you retired and were finally forced to start withdrawals. You could leave any remaining retirement money to your children and they could continue benefiting from tax deferral by extending distributions over their lifetimes.

As you note, this “stretch IRA” option is no longer available for most non-spouse beneficiaries, who must empty inherited retirement accounts within 10 years. Plus, good savers like you and your husband often face a higher tax bracket, not a lower one, when required minimum distributions begin. That further weakens the argument for delaying withdrawals as long as possible. Also, large-enough RMDs can raise your Medicare premiums and make more of your Social Security income taxable, compounding the overall cost.

From your heirs’ point of view, inheriting your Roth IRA or regular assets is a much better deal than inheriting a pre-tax IRA. Every withdrawal from the pre-tax IRA will be subject to income taxes. Not so the Roth, which offers tax-free withdrawals. Regular assets will get a new, stepped-up value at death so that no capital gains taxes will be due on the appreciation that occurred in the original owner’s lifetime.

You have a few years to make adjustments before you’re locked into RMDs. Roth conversions are one possibility, as are “proactive” withdrawals — starting distributions from your IRAs before they’re required. Additional options to explore include qualified charitable distributions (direct transfers from your IRA to a charity) and qualified longevity annuity contracts, which can provide a lifetime stream of income starting at age 85.

You’d be wise to consult a tax pro who can model different scenarios to figure out the best approach for your situation.

Q&A: Seniors may not have to file tax returns

By 1 Comment

Dear Liz: I disagree with the tax advice you gave to the 85-year-old lady and her husband, age 87, who hadn’t filed a tax return in the last three to five years. Maybe their combined income is so low they don’t have to file. Did you consider that? If not, you should. Not everyone needs a tax adviser to add two Social Security income forms together and determine that, “No, hon, we don’t have to file.”

Answer: That was actually my first thought. But the fact that the writer said her spouse hadn’t “paid” their income tax in several years indicates they may have owed taxes prior to that point, and that filing tax returns had been routine.

Many people in their 80s don’t have to file federal tax returns because their income is too low. For the 2025 tax year, singles 65 and over with gross incomes under $15,750 don’t need to file. The limit is $31,500 if one member of a married couple is 65 or older and $34,700 if both spouses are 65 or older.

But it would be dangerous and irresponsible to assume that just because someone is older, they no longer owe taxes. The free Tax-Aide service mentioned in the previous column can assess the couple’s situation and provide reassurance if they don’t need to file or help if they do.

Q&A: Can I use health savings account to pay Medicare premiums?

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I’m 65. Can I use a health savings account to pay my Medicare premiums? I do not collect Social Security yet.

Answer: If you already have an HSA, then yes, you can make tax-free withdrawals from it to pay your Medicare premiums. Once you enroll in Medicare, though, you won’t be able to make further contributions to an HSA.

HSAs allow people with high-deductible health insurance plans to save money for current or future medical costs. These accounts offer a rare triple tax advantage: contributions are deductible, the funds grow tax deferred and withdrawals are tax free if the account owner has incurred eligible expenses. Since the funds can be invested and the balance rolled over from year to year, many HSA owners treat these accounts as a supplemental way to save for retirement.

It’s important, though, that the account owner ultimately uses these funds. Although a spouse can inherit an HSA and treat it as their own, any other beneficiary would face income taxes on the balance.

Once you’re 65, you can withdraw HSA money for any reason and not face penalties, but you will be taxed on the withdrawals if they don’t meet the rules for qualified medical expenses.

For example, you can take tax-free withdrawals to pay premiums for the various parts of Medicare: Part A (hospital coverage, which is free for most people), Part B (doctor’s visits), Part C (Medicare Advantage), and Part D (prescription drug coverage). The premium for a Medicare supplemental policy, though, isn’t considered to be a qualified medical expense, so you’d owe taxes on any withdrawal for that.

Premiums for other health insurance policies typically don’t qualify for tax-free withdrawals, with a few exceptions, such as paying for COBRA continuation coverage.

Keep in mind that you can use previous years’ medical expenses to justify a tax-free withdrawal, as long as the unreimbursed expense occurred after opening your HSA. You’ll want to keep receipts and other records showing that the expenses qualified and you haven’t been reimbursed (through an insurance claim, for example).

Q&A: Beware of transferring a home’s title before death

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I am in my late 70s. My husband is in his mid 80s and in poor health. Are there advantages to transferring the title to our house into my name alone so I can be the sole owner?

Answer: Owning the house solo could make it easier for you to sell or refinance without your husband’s involvement.

But you would miss out on a significant tax break. At least one half of the property — and both halves in community property states — get a new value for tax purposes when a spouse dies. This “step up” in tax basis can reduce or eliminate capital gains taxes when the house is sold.

There could be additional drawbacks, depending on where you live and your circumstances. A tax pro or an estate planning attorney can give you personalized advice.

Q&A: Grandparent’s generosity could affect financial aid

By 2 Comments

Dear Liz: You wrote in a recent column that grandparents could pay tuition directly to a school, and it would not trigger a gift tax return. That’s true, but my daughters have told me — and two private, expensive, and not excessively generous universities have verified — that my paying $20,000 in tuition would decrease my grandchildren’s financial aid package by $10,000 to $20,000. I would appreciate your comments.

Answer: How about, “No good deed goes unpunished — at least at private, expensive and not excessively generous universities?”

The vast majority of colleges use the Free Application for Federal Student Aid or FAFSA to determine financial need. The FAFSA was revised a few years ago so that it no longer counts cash gifts from grandparents or other non-custodial relatives. The same is true for withdrawals from 529 college savings plans owned by non-custodial relatives. Before the change, such gifts and withdrawals would be counted as untaxed student income, which had a huge negative effect on financial aid. Now, the money has no impact at all — except at schools that haven’t adopted these changes.

About 200 private colleges and universities use an additional tool, the College Scholarship Service (CSS) Profile, which can still factor in help from grandparents and other relatives. Typically, though, the maximum reduction would be 50%, not dollar for dollar.