traditional IRA

Q&A: When a new school district has a bad retirement plan

August 10, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I have taught for 22 years and recently accepted a position in a neighboring school district. I have a 403(b) retirement plan invested in a low-cost target date fund. The neighboring district’s vendor list does not include this option. Would it be more advantageous to leave my money in the current account or to roll it into a brokerage with a target date fund? If so, how do I choose what’s right for me?

Answer: As a teacher, you need to be aware that many districts’ 403(b) plans are scandalously bad. Instead of offering sensible, low-cost options, these subpar retirement plans are filled with high-fee annuities.

Your current plan is one of the better ones, since you have access to low-cost mutual funds. You can investigate the neighboring district’s plan at 403bwise.org, a nonprofit site dedicated to educating teachers about the issue. The site has reviews of many districts’ plans. If your new district isn’t included, the site has tips on how to get more information, evaluate your options and press for change.

If the new plan is a stinker, you can leave your money in the old plan, although you won’t be able to make new contributions. You also could consider rolling the account into an IRA at a brokerage. (Don’t move it to a regular brokerage account, as that would be considered a withdrawal that can be taxed and penalized.) An IRA would give you vastly more investment options, but if your 403(b) allows loans you’d lose the ability to borrow against your account. Also, workplace retirement plans such as 403(b)s and 401(k)s typically allow penalty-free withdrawals starting at age 55 if you leave your job, while with IRAs you generally must wait until age 59½.

The question remains if you should consider investing in the new district’s plan. The answer is yes if it includes any of 403bwise’s “green” rated options of low-cost funds. The answer is probably no otherwise. Teachers without good investment options should consider lobbying their district to adopt another type of retirement account, the 457(b) plan. For more information, check out 403bwise’s sister site, 457bwiser, at https://457bwiser.org/.

Q&A: Should I make my kids beneficiaries of my IRA?

July 13, 2026 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: Since retiring, I’ve been converting a traditional pre-tax IRA to a Roth IRA. I’ve got another small pre-tax account that I could do the same with. My reason for converting is that my spouse has a very large pre-tax IRA that probably won’t be used up in our lifetimes, and I don’t want my adult children to face a large tax bomb when we both are gone.

Is there any downside to including our kids as beneficiaries for that account, say 10% each? That way, if he dies before I do, some of the pre-tax account will be delivered to the kids (starting the 10-year distribution clock), and then they’d have another 10 years to withdraw (and pay taxes on) whatever remains at my death. I could foresee adding grandkids as beneficiaries as they approach adulthood.

Is this a bad idea? Would it be better to continue whittling down the pre-tax accounts by converting them to Roth accounts?

Answer: Last week’s column covered some of the hazards of leaving retirement accounts to minor children. If the account was owned by anyone other than a parent, distributions would need to start immediately and likely would be subject to the parent’s tax rate. Plus, handing a big wad of cash to a teenager or young adult often isn’t advisable. You can control the distributions by creating a trust, but that has its own tax implications.

Including your adult children as beneficiaries isn’t as fraught with peril, but you do lose some flexibility. The surviving spouse is allowed to treat an inherited IRA as their own, which may allow them to delay distributions. Plus if the kids are in their peak earning years when they inherit, they could wind up paying taxes at high rates.

Continuing with the Roth conversions may be a better way to defuse the tax bomb, particularly if your tax rate is lower than theirs and you’re willing to foot the tax bill. You’re reducing the size of the taxable IRA while creating a tax-free pot of money for your heirs. Obviously you’ll want to discuss all this with your tax pro and your estate planning attorney before proceeding.

Q&A: Sorting out IRA taxes

October 24, 2022 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My traditional IRA contains both pre-tax and after-tax contributions. (Some years I was ineligible to deduct contributions because I was participating in an employer’s retirement program.) Now I am retired and am considering making Roth conversions from the traditional account. I admit I was a little careless about keeping track of the total after-tax contributions. For the past 10 years or so, I have been using one of the more popular tax programs and was letting it track the tax basis and file the Forms 8606. I recently reconstructed all of my IRA contributions since 1985 to check the basis and discovered that the amount the software had calculated was short by about $15,000. Is it possible to correct this so that I don’t end up paying tax on the wrong basis?

Answer: Yes, but this could be a difficult process, according to Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting.

As you know, when making Roth conversions you’re required to pay income taxes on the portion of your IRA that represents deductible contributions plus any earnings. But you don’t have to pay taxes on the portion of your account that represents your nondeductible contributions — that is what is known as your tax basis. A higher basis means less taxes, so correcting this may be worth the effort.

You’ll have to go back and correct each Form 8606, working from the oldest year, Luscombe says. The corrections need to reflect the traditional IRA contributions for that year, including the dollar amount, any deduction taken and the return of any excess contribution.

Send the corrected 8606s to the same service center where you will send the tax return for the conversion. If you’ve taken any distributions from the account, your calculations for the taxable portion may be in error as well. You can correct that for the past three tax years, but you won’t be able to recover the excess tax paid in any previous years, Luscombe says.

Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner, is a personal finance columnist for NerdWallet. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the “Contact” form at asklizweston.com.

Tax bills for inherited IRAs

August 19, 2013 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I am 64. My grown children, ages 23 and 25, are the beneficiaries of my retirement accounts. I have a Roth IRA, a SIMPLE IRA and a Rollover IRA. When I die, what will be the tax consequences for them? Will they have to pay any tax upon inheriting the accounts, and will they have to pay any tax when they withdraw the money over time?

Answer: If your estate is worth less than $5 million, it’s unlikely it will incur federal estate taxes. Some states have lower exemption limits and a few have inheritance taxes. New Jersey and Delaware have both. An online search for “state estate and inheritance taxes” should turn up the situation for your state.

Your children won’t have to pay income taxes on distributions from your Roth, but unlike you or a spouse they are required to take distributions once they inherit the account. They can either do so within five years of your death or they can opt to spread the distributions over their lifetimes (which is usually the better option).

Minimum distributions also will be required from your IRAs. Your heirs will have to pay income taxes on those distributions.

Advise your children to consult a tax pro after you die, since these accounts need to be properly handled and titled to get the most benefit.