Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

revocable living trust

Q&A: Bowing out of trustee duty

By

Dear Liz: My husband agreed to serve as successor trustee for his brother’s living trust several years ago. My brother-in-law also added me as a backup. My brother-in-law’s financial situation has gotten very complicated and we would like to be removed as trustees. How do we go about this removal? My husband has asked his brother to see the lawyer who drafted the trust so they can both discuss the change, but his brother has ignored this request for several months.

Answer: A successor trustee’s role is similar to that of an executor. Both are charged with settling someone’s estate. Being asked to serve is an honor, since the person choosing you is saying they expect you will act with honor, integrity and prudence. But you can’t be forced to serve, even if you initially said yes.

Your brother-in-law may have already named other alternatives. If not, a court can appoint someone. This would undermine one of the benefits of a living trust, which is to avoid a court’s involvement in settling an estate. But that’s ultimately your brother-in-law’s problem to solve, not yours.

Before you bail, though, understand that as successor trustee or executor, you don’t have to be a legal or tax expert. You can use the estate’s resources to hire people to help you — and in all but the simplest estates, you probably should.

Of course, financial complications can lead to other complications — family fights, disgruntled heirs and so on. You may no longer have the energy or willingness to face such difficulties. If that’s the case, you’ve given your brother-in-law the heads-up he needs to make other arrangements.

Q&A: In estate planning, finding the right trustees can be a challenge

By

Dear Liz: My partner of 37 years and I have shared a revocable living trust for much of that time. It has become necessary to update our successor trustees, since one has passed away and the second is our age. It has been pointed out that we ought to name younger people who are more likely be around when the need arises. This is becoming the hard part. Both of us have a single sister but they are also seniors, so not the best long-term choice. Nieces and nephews live out of state and are not the ideal choice, either. I am wondering about designating this task to an accountant or attorney firm but have absolutely no idea how to make this happen.

Answer: Yours is a common issue for “solo agers” — people who don’t have reliable adult children who can take over in case of incapacity or death.

Naming someone younger does increase the odds the person will be able to serve when the time comes, but nothing is guaranteed. That’s why Los Angeles estate planning attorney Burton Mitchell urges his clients to focus first on naming the best choices, rather than eliminating people because of age or geography. He also recommends naming multiple alternates. Circumstances change, and your first choice may not be available when you need them.

You want successor trustees who are trustworthy, dependable and honest. They don’t have to be relatives: Friends or professionals may be good choices if they’re willing to serve. Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach, urges you to ask first before naming a tax pro, attorney or financial advisor, since many are unable or unwilling to serve in this capacity for clients.

Professional fiduciaries may be another option, or you can look for professional or corporate trustees. Your local bank may offer trust administration services, for example. These options obviously would be more costly than a friend or family member. Sawday recommends consulting a knowledgeable estate planning attorney who can recommend trust officers or professional fiduciaries for you to interview.

Even if you opt for a professional to handle the financial side, you may prefer to have a friend or relative serve as your healthcare decision maker should you become incapacitated. In that case, geography may matter, since the person may need to get to the hospital quickly or spend an extended period advocating for you. Even here, though, it’s more important to name the right people, rather than necessarily the closest ones. You want someone who understands your priorities and who will fight to ensure those priorities are honored. Someone older who understands the concept of a “good death” may be more appropriate than someone younger who doesn’t. (Katy Butler’s book “The Art of Dying Well” has helpful information for this choice.)

If you don’t have enough people in your life you can rely on, there’s still time to turn that around. As a fellow solo ager, certified financial planner Carolyn McClanahan recommends building a mixed-age community. McClanahan says this means making “care deposits” starting in your 50s by volunteering and mentoring younger people.

“If you come from a place of giving, when you get older, that tribe is willing to look out for you,” she says.

Q&A: Does insurance cover a home in a living trust?

By

Dear Liz: All of our insurance policies list my name and that of my husband. After the recent devastating Los Angeles fires, I heard from friends that we should add the name of our living trust to our home insurance policy because our house is in the trust. Otherwise, they say, some insurance companies may not cover loss or damages to it due to the discrepancy in the names, even if the trust has both of our names as trustees. Would you please confirm this?

Answer: Yes. If your home is in a trust, your insurance policies should list your trust as an “additional insured.” Insurance companies vary in their contract language, but you don’t want to find out after the fact that you aren’t covered.

Q&A: Long overdue to dust off that living trust

By

Dear Liz: It’s been over 25 years since we paid for a living trust from a lawyer. We have since misplaced the original document. Our house is all paid up and we have one child. In case of our death, can he request a copy of the living trust from the county register?

Answer: Some states do allow living trusts to be registered with local courts, but typically these documents are private and never filed with a government agency.

You’re long overdue for an updated document, in any case. Estate plans should be reviewed every three to five years, after major life changes and whenever estate tax laws change — as they did in 2001, 2010 and 2017.

Q&A: After creating a living trust, don’t forget to review it

By

Dear Liz: My husband and I created a living trust about six years ago. How often do we need to review it with an attorney if we’ve had no major life changes?

Answer: You’re already overdue.

The standard advice is to have your attorney review your trust every three to five years or after major life events, including marriage, divorce, a birth, a death, a change in your financial status or a move across state lines. You also should review and update your schedule of assets to reflect accounts you’ve opened and closed in the intervening years.

Q&A: Big banks can cause big headaches when it comes to retitling accounts

By

Dear Liz: Someone recently asked whether to make a bank account “payable on death” or put it in their living trust. Our bank has refused to allow us to retitle our accounts so we can have them in our trust. Is “payable on death” our only option?

Answer: No, but you may need to move your accounts to another firm.

Some large national banks do balk at retitling bank accounts, notes Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach. By contrast, many smaller banks, credit unions and big brokerage firms have no problem retitling accounts to living trusts.

If your bank isn’t willing to help you now, just imagine how difficult it will make matters for your loved ones after you die and they need to access your accounts, Sawday says.

If you’re reluctant to leave your big bank entirely, consider keeping a small amount of money in a day-to-day checking account while putting the bulk of your cash in a more trust-friendly bank.