Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Legal Matters

Q&A: Can stepmother prevent siblings from sharing their inheritance?

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: My father passed away in May of last year. In his trust, he intentionally left out one of my four children. The remaining three, who were to inherit a substantial sum, decided to pool their money and share it with their excluded sibling.

My stepmother, who is in charge of his trust, has told other recipients of his largess that she will not be distributing any money to my children. She claims that their decision to give money to their sibling is a violation of my father’s wishes. Can she do this legally and would there be any consequences to her for doing this?

Answer: That depends on the trust’s language. Your father may have granted your stepmother the power to make discretionary distributions, or may have explicitly stated that distributions could be withheld from your children if they planned to share with the disinherited grandchild.

That’s not the norm, however. If the trust requires her to distribute the money and she fails to do so, your children could sue her for breaching her fiduciary duties and ask a court to replace her as trustee, says Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach. If your stepmother’s attorney hasn’t explained this to her already, your kids may need to hire one who will.

The unanswered question: Why did your kids make their plan known, rather than simply waiting close-mouthed until the money was distributed? Perhaps they wanted to make a show of solidarity with their sibling, but the smarter course would have been to keep their intentions under wraps until the money landed in their accounts and was theirs to spend however they saw fit.

Q&A: Hard copies, thumb drives and the cloud: How to handle vital records when it’s time to flee

By Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: We are assembling our important document to-go box with the typical things advised should we need to evacuate, such as birth and marriage certificates, passports, insurance documents, mortgage statements, etc. Many of the documents can be accessed online, so I wondered about pay-off statements from old loans and mortgages. Is it important to take copies of those? Also, what about grant deeds from previous properties that we no longer own?

Answer: In a disaster, you’ll need information to help you establish your identity and document what you currently own. Focus on safeguarding the most important paperwork and figure you can recreate the rest if necessary.

Start with documents that would be time-consuming or a hassle to replace, such as passports, birth and marriage certificates, immigration records, military records, vehicle titles, home inventories, appraisals, home plans or blueprints, recent tax returns and wills or other estate planning documents. The originals should be stored in a water- and fireproof place, such as a home safe or other secure location.

Consider storing copies of these documents, along with photos of your driver’s license and vehicle registration, on an encrypted thumb drive in your go bag or in a secure cloud-based storage service (Everplans is one option.) You could put physical copies in your evacuation bag, but much of the information could be helpful to an identity thief if stolen so you’ll have to weigh convenience against security.

Insurance policies are usually accessible online, but you may want to include your insurance companies’ contact information and policy numbers.

Also consider digitizing any family photos that aren’t already stored in the cloud. You may not have time to grab albums, and disaster victims often lament not having copied irreplaceable photos.

Q&A: Why Every Adult Needs a Financial and Healthcare Power of Attorney

By

Dear Liz: Please tell your audience that if they have any bank accounts, loans, credit cards or utilities, they should legally appoint someone to make decisions for them if they should become ill or injured.

The backstory: My then-40-year-old son went to the hospital with a stomachache. He fortunately told the hospital I could make healthcare decisions for him if he became incapacitated. He then suffered cardiac arrest that resulted in anoxic brain injury. After his injury, I had to deal with such things as ending his apartment lease, canceling utilities and dealing with his car loan and bank account. I had no legal authority because he did not have a will, trust or advance directive. I subsequently learned that being a conservator would enable me to do the necessary things on my son’s behalf. The entire experience was dreadful, and I wish it on no one else.

Answer: The document that could have helped you is called a financial power of attorney and every adult should have one. Financial powers of attorney designate a trusted person to pay bills, file tax returns, close accounts and make other money decisions should the creator become incapacitated. These documents can be created online for about $40, although attorneys also offer them as part of the estate planning package when creating wills or living trusts. If your son had created one, it would have saved the thousands of dollars you probably paid to get a conservatorship.

The second document every adult needs is a healthcare power of attorney, also known as a healthcare proxy, which names someone to make medical decisions in case of incapacity. Again, these are easily created online or can be drafted as part of an estate plan, and they can spare families the agony and expense of going to court to care for a loved one.

Q&A: Trust in the flexibility of living trusts

By

Dear Liz: Is naming a beneficiary for a nonretirement, “payable on death” account as effective as putting the account in a living trust? It seems easier than doing all the paperwork each time I open an account, but is it a good idea?

Answer: Both living trusts and payable on death accounts avoid probate, the court process that otherwise typically follows death. But living trusts offer more flexibility and control.

Let’s say you want to benefit two relatives equally, and are leaving a savings account to one and a brokerage account to the other. The balances of the two accounts may be roughly equal today, but could be dramatically different by the time you die. A trust allows you to divvy up your assets regardless of where the money is kept.

Trusts also allow you to put restrictions on how money is spent, which can be important if your heir is a minor child, a spendthrift or someone reliant on public benefits. Payable on death accounts don’t allow restrictions.

Should you become incapacitated, the successor trustee of your living trust could access trust assets to pay for your care. Beneficiaries of payable-on-death accounts can’t get to the funds until you die, so a court procedure may be necessary to provide for you.

After you die, the person settling your estate probably will need money to cover your burial and funeral expenses, pay your bills and final taxes and perhaps get your house ready for sale. If the needed funds have already been distributed to beneficiaries of payable on death accounts, this person might be faced with asking for funds to be returned or paying out of their own pocket, says Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach.

There’s also the piecemeal nature of payable on death accounts. Keeping track of and updating beneficiaries can be a chore. If a beneficiary dies before you, that can create administrative problems as well.

Payable on death accounts can be a low-cost solution for people who don’t have much money and who can’t afford to pay for a trust. If you already have a trust, though, it makes sense to use it.

You typically don’t have to update your living trust every time you open a new account, by the way. Discuss the issue with your estate planning attorney, but typically all that’s needed is to add the account to the schedule of assets that’s usually at the end of your trust document.

Q&A: These major financial decisions shouldn’t be DIY projects. Talk to an expert!

By

Dear Liz: I anticipate being dead soon (cancer). I have established an irrevocable trust for my 8-year-old child, with my 47-year-old wife as the trustee. With respect to taxes and other issues and naming beneficiaries, what is the optimal strategy regarding my child for life insurance and traditional and Roth IRAs? My wife will get the 401(k).

Answer: The best person to answer those questions is the estate planning attorney you (presumably) used to create the irrevocable trust. Estate planning should not be a do-it-yourself activity, particularly when minor children are involved. The wrong plan could give too much too soon to your child, or tie up the money too long. You also don’t want to unreasonably stint your wife in your efforts to preserve money for your child. Also, the optimal strategies for tax purposes may not be the best for your family’s situation.

For example, the best way to minimize taxes may be to leave all the retirement money to your wife. Spouses who inherit retirement funds have the option of treating the accounts as their own. That means your wife wouldn’t have to begin required minimum distributions from the 401(k) or the traditional IRA until she’s 75. (The current RMD age is 73, but it rises to 75 for people born in 1960 and later.) She would not have to take distributions from a Roth IRA she inherits from you.

Non-spouse heirs generally have to drain retirement accounts within 10 years. Minors who inherit retirement funds don’t have to take the first distribution until they turn 21, but then the accounts must be emptied within 10 years.

Life insurance proceeds typically aren’t taxable, or payable to a minor child. But you can create a trust to receive and dole out the proceeds to your child. Your estate planning attorney can help you set this up.

Q&A: My ex-wife lent my money to her boss. What can I do?

By

Dear Liz: I recently found out that my ex lent one of her former bosses $2,500 to get his brother out of jail on bond. My ex took the money out of a joint account that I had opened with the inheritance I got when my dad died. It’s now been four years and I haven’t received a penny of the loan back. I could really use the money now as I have medical bills to pay. Question is who do I go after? My ex or the boss?

Answer: You may have read in this column that inheritances can be kept as separate property, even in community property states where other assets acquired during marriage are generally considered jointly owned.

An inheritance can lose its status as separate property, however, if it’s commingled with joint funds. That’s what you did when you opened a joint account with the money: You gave your ex access to the funds.

You certainly can ask the ex and the boss to give the money back. You could try small claims court if that doesn’t work. You also could hire an attorney, but the costs of trying to get the loan repaid may well exceed the amount at stake.