• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

  • About
  • Liz’s Books
  • Speaking
  • Disclosure
  • Contact

Q&A: Professional investment management fees

April 10, 2017 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: I have an IRA with over $100,000 at a discount brokerage. I had it in a target date fund. Due to market downturns, I got nervous and was convinced to put my investment into the brokerage’s portfolio advisory services with additional fees coming to $1,600 per year. In general, is it wise to change investments to these more professional services?

Answer: If professional management keeps you from bailing out of your investments when markets decline, then paying a higher fee may be justified. But the higher the fees you pay, the less money you can accumulate. For example, your IRA could grow to more than $600,000 over 30 years if you net a 6% return. If your fees are one percentage point higher, and you net just 5%, you’d end up with less than $450,000.

Some discount brokers, including Schwab, Fidelity and Vanguard, now offer a low-cost “robo” option that invests your money using computer algorithms. These robo options don’t offer the highly customized investment portfolios that some other services provide, but they come at a much lower cost — typically 0.3% to 0.4%. A few, including Vanguard and Betterment, offer access to financial advisors.

Related Posts

  • Investment fees could leave you old and broke

    You want to save as much as possible for retirement. The financial services industry wants…

  • Q&A: Investment advisor’s fees

    Dear Liz: Two years ago I rolled my 401(k) into an IRA at the suggestion…

  • Do debt management plans work?

    Nonprofit credit counselors are the good guys in the debt relief industry, which is otherwise…

  • Q&A: Investment returns

    Dear Liz: In a recent column you mentioned a fund that shows a return of…

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: fees, Investments, money managers, q&a

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Tom says

    April 14, 2017 at 1:46 pm

    I just read an answer of yours that referred to “robo” advisors at Schwab, Fidelity, etc. as low-cost alternatives for investing. I have looked into the Schwab robo advisors and no matter how much I change my answers to their questions I never can come up with a portfolio that has less that 10% in cash. Parking that much of the account into cash is, to me, a big fee and has kept me from using Schwab’s robo accounts. Am I being a bit paranoid about the large cash holding or is Scwhab hiding a big fee? BTW…I have a lot of accounts at Schwab, with a few stocks and several low-cost mutual funds and using a robo account would be in addition to those standard accounts which is why I don’t want a big cash holding. I keep cash in other accounts.

    • Liz Weston says

      April 14, 2017 at 3:01 pm

      You correctly identified the fee in Schwab’s supposedly no-fee offering. Here’s just one of the articles that’s been written about that: http://www.thinkadvisor.com/2015/03/12/robo-advisors-rip-schwabs-new-robo-advisory-over-f

Primary Sidebar

Search

Copyright © 2025 · Ask Liz Weston 2.0 On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in