Ask Liz Weston

Get smart with your money

Investing

Q&A: Planning for retirement in a volatile market

By

Dear Liz: I have a retirement account at work and a stock portfolio. Both are down significantly this year and I’m tired of losing money. What are the safest options now?

Answer: Before the “what” you need to think about the “why” and the “when.” Why are you investing in the first place? And when will you need this money?

If you’re investing for retirement, you may not need the money for years or decades. Even when you’re retired, you’ll likely need to keep a portion of your money in stocks if you want to keep ahead of inflation. The price for that inflation-beating power is suffering through occasional downturns.

You won’t suffer those downturns in “safer” investments such as U.S. Treasuries or FDIC-insured savings accounts, but you also won’t achieve the growth you likely need to meet your retirement goals. In fact, you may be losing money after inflation and taxes are factored in.

Also keep in mind that if you sell during downturns, you’ve locked in your losses. Any money that’s not invested won’t be able to participate in the inevitable rebounds after downturns. Plus, you may be generating a tax bill, since a stock that’s down for the year may still be worth more than when you bought it. (You don’t have to worry about taxes with most retirement accounts until you withdraw the money, but selling stocks in other accounts can generate capital gains.)

The exception to all this is if you have money in stocks that you’re likely to need within five years. If that’s the case, the money should be moved to investments that preserve principal so the cash will be there when you need it.

Q&A: Clearing up some confusion over those proprietary funds

By

Dear Liz: Your recent column about proprietary funds confused me. You mentioned that selling these funds can trigger capital gains tax. Is it not true we can move investments directly from one money manager to another and not take a capital gain as long as the funds remain invested?

Answer: If you can move a fund from one investment company to another, then it likely is not a proprietary fund. For example, Schwab, Fidelity, Vanguard and many other firms create funds that bear their names, but these investments can be bought and sold at other brokerages.

Proprietary funds, by contrast, typically lock customers into investments that can’t be transferred to another firm. To get your money out, you have to sell the fund, which can trigger a tax bill. This is a significant downside and one investors should understand before committing their money to this type of fund.

Q&A: After a windfall, questions on what to do with the cash

By

Dear Liz: After selling my house and downsizing at age 84, I am cash rich for the first time in my life. My goal now is not so much to grow the money substantially, but to avoid paying taxes on my investments, as I would have to do with certificates of deposit. Are tax-free municipal bonds my best option, or what would you suggest?

Answer: If you’re in a high tax bracket — roughly 32% or higher — the lower interest rates paid on municipal bonds can still give you a good-enough return to make buying them worthwhile. If you’re in a low tax bracket, the math doesn’t work so well.

Also, municipal bonds aren’t covered by FDIC insurance the way a certificate of deposit would be. Investing in bonds involves some risk. The chances of default are minimal if you choose highly-rated bonds, but your bonds could lose value if interest rates rise.

Consider using some of your cash to consult a fiduciary, fee-only planner who can help you figure out a strategy that reflects all aspects of your financial situation, not just your tax bill.

Q&A: Proprietary investment funds might offer a personal touch, but they come with an important catch

By

Dear Liz: One subject I’ve never seen you address is the use of proprietary funds by financial advisors. We’ve taken over the finances of my in-laws, whose advisor put their money in a well-balanced portfolio, but all within a proprietary fund group. We are more or less stuck with continuing with their advisor because only certain agents can manage those funds. Also, getting out of the funds would require paying substantial capital gains. I am counseling my adult children as they make their investment choices to do as we have done and stick with funds that could be ported to other advisors or managed personally so they don’t get in a similar situation. Thoughts?

Answer: Proprietary mutual funds have enough potential disadvantages that people should do plenty of research before committing their money.

Brokerages and other financial institutions create their own proprietary or “house brand” funds to compete with the “name brand” or third-party funds managed by outside companies. But while a name-brand fund can be moved to another brokerage, a proprietary fund is typically just that — proprietary to the firm that created it, and not transferable. To get your money out, you would have to sell the proprietary fund and suffer any tax consequences.

Brokerages typically say that proprietary funds allow them to customize investments for their clients. That may be true, but proprietary funds also allow them to make more money, creating a conflict of interest.

Q&A: A husband handles the investing. What happens when he’s gone?

By

Dear Liz: My husband has always handled our investments. He doesn’t think it makes sense to pay someone 1% to do what he can do on his own. As we’re getting older, I’m starting to worry about what I would do if he dies first. We also have a friend who got scammed, and it’s made me wonder whether that could happen to us. I would like to talk to a fee-only advisor like you always recommend, but I’m not sure how to get him on board.

Answer: Start with your concerns about having to take over the finances should he die or become incapacitated. Having someone trustworthy to help you through this process can be incredibly valuable, and it doesn’t need to be someone who charges 1% to manage your investments.

You can get referrals to fiduciary, fee-only planners who charge by the hour at Garrett Planning Network. The XY Planning Network and the Alliance for Comprehensive Planners represent fiduciary, fee-only planners who charge retainer fees. (Fiduciary means the planner is committed to putting your best interests first. Most advisors are held to a lower suitability standard, which means they don’t have to put your interests ahead of their own.)

Researchers have found that our financial decision-making abilities peak at age 53. Unfortunately, our confidence in our financial acumen remains high even as our cognition declines. The growing gap between our self-regard and reality can leave us vulnerable to bad investments, bad decisions and bad people.

An advisor could take a look at your portfolio and recommend ways to make it easier to manage as you age. The advisor also could discuss strategies and safeguards to protect you from mistakes and predators. Once you have established the relationship, you should be able to get more help down the road if you need it. (Consider the advisor’s age and status, though; a younger advisor or one who’s part of a large practice might be a better idea in this scenario than a solo practitioner who is approaching retirement age.)

Q&A: Trust in the flexibility of living trusts

By

Dear Liz: Is naming a beneficiary for a nonretirement, “payable on death” account as effective as putting the account in a living trust? It seems easier than doing all the paperwork each time I open an account, but is it a good idea?

Answer: Both living trusts and payable on death accounts avoid probate, the court process that otherwise typically follows death. But living trusts offer more flexibility and control.

Let’s say you want to benefit two relatives equally, and are leaving a savings account to one and a brokerage account to the other. The balances of the two accounts may be roughly equal today, but could be dramatically different by the time you die. A trust allows you to divvy up your assets regardless of where the money is kept.

Trusts also allow you to put restrictions on how money is spent, which can be important if your heir is a minor child, a spendthrift or someone reliant on public benefits. Payable on death accounts don’t allow restrictions.

Should you become incapacitated, the successor trustee of your living trust could access trust assets to pay for your care. Beneficiaries of payable-on-death accounts can’t get to the funds until you die, so a court procedure may be necessary to provide for you.

After you die, the person settling your estate probably will need money to cover your burial and funeral expenses, pay your bills and final taxes and perhaps get your house ready for sale. If the needed funds have already been distributed to beneficiaries of payable on death accounts, this person might be faced with asking for funds to be returned or paying out of their own pocket, says Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach.

There’s also the piecemeal nature of payable on death accounts. Keeping track of and updating beneficiaries can be a chore. If a beneficiary dies before you, that can create administrative problems as well.

Payable on death accounts can be a low-cost solution for people who don’t have much money and who can’t afford to pay for a trust. If you already have a trust, though, it makes sense to use it.

You typically don’t have to update your living trust every time you open a new account, by the way. Discuss the issue with your estate planning attorney, but typically all that’s needed is to add the account to the schedule of assets that’s usually at the end of your trust document.