Estate planning

Q&A: “Simple” ways to avoid probate often create complications

August 5, 2025 By Liz Weston Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I was perplexed by your column in which you pooh-poohed pay-on-death and transfer-on-death accounts in favor of trusts. But you gave no specific explanation. Rather, you said trusts “generally allow a smoother, more organized settlement of the estate than other probate-avoidance options.” Would you please explain what is smoother and more organized than POD and TOD transfers? (Beneficiary deeds fall into the same category as POD and TOD, to my way of thinking.) These transfers simply involve a copy of the death certificate and some minimal paperwork. What could be simpler?

Answer: The fact that you asked this question suggests you may not be familiar with the many ways these transfers can cause unintended problems. An estate planning attorney could fill you in.

One issue covered previously in this column is the fact that the person settling the estate typically needs money to pay final bills. If all the funds in the estate have been transferred to beneficiaries, the executor would have to beg for money to be returned (with no guarantee beneficiaries will cooperate) or pay the expenses out of their own pocket.

Another obvious issue is unequal distribution if you have more than one heir. Account values can change over time, leading to sometimes dramatic differences in what the beneficiaries receive.

Speaking of change, it’s the one constant in life. A living trust allows you to easily update your estate plan in one centralized place as circumstances change. Altering beneficiary designations can take a lot more work, and it’s easy to miss an account if you have several.

Beneficiary designations offer limited contingency planning. If the beneficiaries die before you or otherwise can’t inherit, the account could come back into your estate and be subject to probate. Also, many people forget to update their beneficiaries after major life changes, which can mean the wrong people inherit. More than one ex-spouse has received retirement funds or life insurance proceeds because the beneficiary form wasn’t updated.

Another unfortunately common occurrence is an inheritance that disqualifies a disabled beneficiary from receiving government benefits. You also can’t control how money is spent with a beneficiary designation, which can be a problem if the beneficiary is a minor, an addict or a spendthrift.

Plus, people get sued. Beneficiary designations offer no protection against creditors, while a properly written trust can help protect your assets and your heirs’ inheritance.

This is by no means an exhaustive list of the potential issues with beneficiary designations. They can be a solution for people with limited funds who can’t afford to pay an estate planning attorney, or when they’re part of a coordinated estate plan. Many people set up a trust for real estate and financial accounts, for example, and use beneficiaries for retirement accounts, notes Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach.

The more money you have and the more complex your situation, the more you — and your heirs — would benefit from expert, individualized advice.

Q&A: Revocable vs. irrevocable trusts

July 22, 2025 By Liz Weston Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: What is the difference between a revocable trust and an irrevocable trust? Which one is better? I am a widow with two sons who will inherit my estate. My net worth is $1.4 million, including a mortgage-free house.

Answer: The two types of trusts serve different functions, so neither is inherently better than the other.

Revocable trusts can be changed as long as the trust creator — that would be you — is still alive. You retain control over the assets in the trust and can sell or dispose of them as you wish. The most common revocable trust is a living trust, which allows estates to avoid the court process known as probate.

Irrevocable trusts typically can’t be changed. They are often used to protect assets or reduce an estate for tax purposes. The trust creator generally loses control over what happens to the assets in the trust. Irrevocable trusts are typically more complicated to set up and to administer, and may require a separate tax return.

An estate planning attorney can review your situation and advise which kind of trust, if any, might be best for your situation.

Q&A: What to do if you don’t trust your trustee?

July 15, 2025 By Liz Weston Leave a Comment

Dear Liz: I own several properties. I have a living trust that names my two minor children as beneficiaries. I’ve told my attorney that I want to transfer the properties to my children using the county form. This will give my children who are under 10 years of age ownership as tenants in common with the right of survivorship. I believe this avoids any tax consequences. I will still keep my living trust and make some adjustments per this change. My attorney states I will lose the step-up in tax basis if I do this. As I see it, this may not be a concern as my primary goal is to give my children these properties in the event of my passing. I do not trust anyone whom I name as trustee to my living trust. I do not care about the step-in-basis as doing it this way avoids delays, assures ownership and avoids possible fraud. The trustee could sell the properties and spend the money. Keep in mind my children are minors as of this date. Sure, they could file a lawsuit, but you need money to file an action and once the money is long gone, good luck in getting it back. This way it gives immediate ownership to my children, and I avoid these problems that may occur.

Answer: If you really don’t know anyone you can trust to look after your children’s interests, then you’ve got quite a dilemma.

Your children are too young to legally own real estate in their own names, so some kind of guardian or trustee would need to be involved in managing the property, notes Jennifer Sawday, an estate planning attorney in Long Beach. Plus, you have no idea now whether your kids will be able to responsibly handle such an inheritance once they’re legally allowed to take over at 18 or 21 (depending on the age of majority in your state). Few people that age are ready for such a big responsibility. If a child develops an addiction or spendthrift tendencies, they could quickly waste their inheritance.

Plus, transferring property can have huge tax consequences, including the loss of step-up in tax basis that your attorney mentioned as well as property tax reassessments. (In California, such transfers avoid reassessment only when a primary residence is transferred and the child continues to live in the home. Commercial property, rental property and vacation homes get reassessed upon transfer.)

If you have no friends or relatives who are ethical, honest and trustworthy, then you’ll need to consider hiring a professional fiduciary or trustee. Your attorney can discuss your options.

Q&A: Why living trusts are a good option, most of the time

July 7, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My goal is to avoid probate and allow simplified access for my heir, who is also my executor. I have no family. I have chosen payable-on-death and transfer-on-death accounts instead of putting all financial assets in my trust, against the wishes of the attorney who drew up the trust for my condo. I am 79, with about a million in financial assets, with no debt or mortgage, and I am self-insured for long-term healthcare. Is the decision to use these accounts appropriate for me?

Answer: Please take the advice you paid for. The trust you have is probably a living trust, a flexible estate-planning device that avoids probate. Living trusts generally allow a smoother, more organized settlement of the estate than other probate-avoidance options.

The person who settles your estate is called your successor trustee and will perform much the same duties as an executor. But typically your successor trustee also can handle financial and other matters should you become incapacitated.

As covered in previous columns, payable-on-death and transfer-on-death accounts can be appropriate solutions for people with few assets who can’t afford to pay for a living trust. For more complex estates like yours, however, a living trust is the more appropriate option.

Q&A: Sharing an inherited house with your siblings? It can get complicated

June 9, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: My husband’s parents, who are 88 and 93, respectively, have decided to leave their house, worth $800,000, equally, to their three children, who are all in their sixties. The children get along well and all decisions will be made as a group. None of the adult children can afford to buy out the other two, and the three adults and their families cannot all live in the house at once. Everyone would like to keep the home, which is paid for, in the family. What solutions exist for this situation? Where do we begin, and what questions do we need to ask, thinking into the next generation?

Answer: Owning real estate with other people can be difficult, even when the individuals get along. Perhaps your generation can pull it off, but there’s no guarantee the next one will.

Let’s say the time has come to replace the roof. How will the group decide how much to spend, and will everyone be equally willing to split that considerable cost? How might the dynamics change if one family is living in the home, but the others are expected to pay for repairs and maintenance? What happens if one inheritor later wants to sell, and the others still can’t buy out that share?

Keeping the family home can feel like an important legacy to offer to your children, but not if ownership creates strife that imperils family relationships. An experienced estate planning attorney can meet with you as a group and discuss the scenarios and legal documents you may need going forward.

Q&A: Choosing the right health care agent

May 19, 2025 By Liz Weston

Dear Liz: There is a lot of dysfunction and drama in my family so in my will, I’ve named a friend to be my executor. But I don’t think she’s the best person for my advance healthcare directive. She’s too nice and I think she would cave under pressure from my family. Can I choose someone else?

Answer: Absolutely, and often that’s the best choice.

Your executor is the person who will settle your estate after you die. You should pick someone you know to be trustworthy and diligent. The executor (or successor trustee, if you have a living trust) doesn’t need to be a financial expert, since they can use estate funds to pay for legal and tax help.

The person who makes healthcare decisions for you may need another set of skills. They may face considerable pressure from others, including family, friends or the medical establishment, so you’ll want someone who not only understands your wishes for end-of-life care but who will fight to carry them out.

Your advance care directive or living will is the document where you articulate your wishes for the care you do and don’t want at the end of your life. You’ll also need to create a medical power of attorney, which is where you name the person you want to speak for you if you become incapacitated. Even a detailed advance care directive can’t cover every circumstance, and the power of attorney will help ensure that your chosen person can advocate for you no matter what happens.

You’ll need one more document, which is a financial power of attorney. This names someone who can pay your bills and otherwise handle your finances if you become incapacitated. You can name your executor, the person you named for healthcare decisions or some other person to serve this role. Check with your financial institutions, since they may have their own documents they’ll want you to use.

If possible, you should name at least one backup for each position, since people may not be able to serve when the time comes. Also, your wishes or circumstances could change over time, so all these documents should be reviewed at least annually and updated as necessary.