Are Roths safer than other IRAs?

Dear Liz: I found your recent discussion of Roth IRAs informative. But I’ve been told that one of the main advantages of a Roth vs. a traditional IRA is that a Roth is a safer investment when it comes to creditors trying to attack it. How can that be? Is one type of IRA safer than another?

Answer: The short answer is no.

Employer-sponsored retirement plans, including 401(k)s and 403(b)s, typically have unlimited protection from creditors in Bankruptcy Court. The exceptions: The IRS and former spouses can make claims on such plans.

Individual retirement accounts, including IRAs and Roth IRAs, lack the protection afforded by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA. But the bankruptcy reform law that went into effect in 2005 protects IRAs of all kinds up to a certain limit (which in April rose to $1,245,475).

Short of bankruptcy, the amount of your IRAs or Roth IRAs that creditors can access depends on state law.

If there’s any chance you’ll be filing for bankruptcy or the target of a creditor lawsuit, you should talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney about your options.

Related Posts

  • Missed deadline could limit inherited Roth IRA’s benefits Dear Liz: I inherited my brother's Roth IRA about three years ago. I find it hard to get any information about non-spousal inherited […]
  • Q&A: Roth IRA Dear Liz: I have a 401(k) that has a required annual distribution because I am over 71 1/2 years old. Can I use this distribution as […]
  • Q&A: Rolling 401(k) into an IRA Dear Liz: I'm leaving my job later this month and am trying to decide what to do with my 401(k) account. Some of my friends say to leave […]
  • No match? Save anyway Dear Liz: Lately I have been reading a lot about how people aren't saving enough for retirement. Every article I read talks about the need […]