<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask Liz Weston &#187; Retirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asklizweston.com/tag/retirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asklizweston.com</link>
	<description>Personal Finance Columnist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A reverse mortgage could keep Mom in her home</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2012/02/06/a-reverse-mortgage-could-keep-mom-in-her-home/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2012/02/06/a-reverse-mortgage-could-keep-mom-in-her-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elder Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse mortgage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: My healthy and active 82-year-old mother is faced with having to sell her home this year because she&#8217;s running out of money. She has lived a very minimal lifestyle for many years as her savings dwindled, and her income is now basically Social Security. She owes $25,000 on a home worth more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> My healthy and active 82-year-old mother is faced with having to sell her home this year because she&#8217;s running out of money. She has lived a very minimal lifestyle for many years as her savings dwindled, and her income is now basically Social Security. She owes $25,000 on a home worth more than $700,000 in a top school district. We don&#8217;t know if we are jumping the gun with this sale. I could move in with her and pay rent for a year or two, although that would mean a longer commute for me and would just put off the day she has to sell. There are things that must be done to the house for upkeep, and her being cash-poor puts her in a crunch. My brother will help pay for minor sprucing up depending on what the real estate agent says we need to do to make the house presentable, but if Mom remains in the home there are other things to be done. We are assuming that we should sell it and find an apartment for her to rent until she needs more assisted living at a later age. Are we right to take action now?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Your family needs to take action, but setting your mother up for not just one but possibly two future moves probably isn&#8217;t the best course. Moving is terribly disruptive, and AARP surveys show that the vast majority of older people prefer to &#8220;age in place&#8221; rather than leave their homes.</p>
<p>Investigate reverse mortgages as one option. With a reverse mortgage, your mom could pay off her small mortgage and tap the substantial equity in her home. She could get a lump sum, a stream of monthly checks or a line of credit that could allow her to fix her home and live more comfortably. She wouldn&#8217;t have to make payments or pay income taxes on this loan, and it wouldn&#8217;t have to be paid off until she dies or moves out.</p>
<p>Reverse mortgages can be expensive because of the fees involved, although a new version of the federal Home Equity Conversion Mortgage offers lower upfront fees, and some lenders will waive or reduce their fees. You&#8217;ll want to do plenty of research, and shop around to make sure you get the best deal. The <a href="http://www.aarp.org/">AARP</a> and <a href="http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD">U.S. Housing and Urban Development</a> websites have a lot of information about reverse mortgages.</p>
<p>If your mom decides she&#8217;d rather sell, she should consider a move directly to a senior community that offers assisted living as an option. She will have the most choices if she&#8217;s healthy when she moves in. Although she may never need the assisted living option, many people start to need some kind of help with daily activities by the time they reach their mid-80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2012/02/06/a-reverse-mortgage-could-keep-mom-in-her-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retirement planning without a retirement plan</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/31/retirement-planning-without-a-retirement-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/31/retirement-planning-without-a-retirement-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Retirement Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roth IRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: After nine months of unemployment I finally landed a new job, but at half my former $100,000 salary. In this economy I was happy to get it. I always contributed the maximum to my 401(k) and employee stock purchase plan, but my new company does not offer either of these options. I made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> After nine months of unemployment I finally landed a new job, but at half my former $100,000 salary. In this economy I was happy to get it. I always contributed the maximum to my 401(k) and employee stock purchase plan, but my new company does not offer either of these options. I made it through my period of unemployment on severance, savings and belt tightening. Other than a mortgage, I have no debt. I realize I need to both catch up on missed contributions and continue to put away money for retirement. I just turned 60. What is my best move for continued retirement saving? And how will my reduced salary affect my future Social Security benefits?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You don&#8217;t need your employer to help you save for retirement, fortunately. Since you&#8217;re over 50, you can contribute $6,000 to an IRA or Roth IRA annually. You can open an account at virtually any bank, brokerage or credit union. Look for one that doesn&#8217;t charge you account service fees and that has a broad array of low-cost investment options. Vanguard, for example, waives its service fees for IRA investors who sign up for electronic statements.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re able to save more, you can do so in a regular, taxable brokerage account. You won&#8217;t get a tax break for your contributions, as you would with a traditional IRA, but you can qualify for low capital gains tax rates if you hold your investments for at least a year.</p>
<p>Your Social Security benefits will be based on your 35 highest-earning years. The Social Security website (<a href="http://www.ssa.gov%29/">http://www.ssa.gov</a>) has a <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/planners/calculators.htm">benefits calculator</a> that enables you to see your estimated future benefit based on your work record so far, and that enables you to create different scenarios — such as a lower salary going forward, or different retirement ages — to gauge their effect on your future checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/31/retirement-planning-without-a-retirement-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s no such thing as &#8220;risk free&#8221; retirement investing</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-risk-free-retirement-investing/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-risk-free-retirement-investing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I just started saving for retirement through my job&#8217;s 401(k) plan. I&#8217;ve been putting aside $400 a month. I just checked my account to see how it was doing. It has lost over $600! I am trying to save for my retirement — not lose. Where should I invest? I&#8217;m considering getting a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> I just started saving for retirement through my job&#8217;s 401(k) plan. I&#8217;ve been putting aside $400 a month. I just checked my account to see how it was doing. It has lost over $600! I am trying to save for my retirement — not lose. Where should I invest? I&#8217;m considering getting a financial planner to help me.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> The most important thing you need to know about investing is that there is no such thing as a truly risk-free investment.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t lose your principal if you invest in &#8220;safe&#8221; investments, such as Treasuries and <a id="ORGOV0000242" title="Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/regulatory-policy-organizations/federal-deposit-insurance-corporation-ORGOV0000242.topic">FDIC</a>-insured bank accounts. But you won&#8217;t earn enough to keep ahead of inflation. Basically, you&#8217;ll never be able to save enough to retire, since the purchasing power of your funds will erode over time rather than grow.</p>
<p>To stay ahead of inflation, you need to take more risk. Stocks over time have consistently offered returns that beat inflation. In every 30-year period starting in 1928, stocks have returned average annual returns of at least 8%. But they certainly don&#8217;t gain that much every year, and some years you&#8217;ll face steep losses. When you invest in stocks, you have to be prepared for volatility. In other words, sometimes your investments will lose money.</p>
<p>You can reduce that volatility somewhat by diversifying your stock investments (some small companies, some large; some U.S. companies, some foreign) and by including a diversified mix of bonds in your portfolio, along with cash.</p>
<p>A fee-only financial planner can help you design an investment plan that makes sense for your situation. Or you can consider opting for the &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; or &#8220;target date retirement&#8221; funds offered by your plan, since they do the diversification and rebalancing for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-risk-free-retirement-investing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security: Grab it early, or wait for bigger checks?</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/17/social-security-grab-it-early-or-wait-for-bigger-checks/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/17/social-security-grab-it-early-or-wait-for-bigger-checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: Which is really better? A smaller Social Security check starting at age 62 that you are still young enough to enjoy for years? Or a much larger Social Security check beginning at 70 that you get for a much shorter period, and then just gets signed over to the nursing home or assisted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> Which is really better? A smaller Social Security  check starting at age 62 that you are still young enough to enjoy for  years? Or a much larger Social Security check beginning at 70 that you  get for a much shorter period, and then just gets signed over to the  nursing home or assisted living facility where you wind up? I won&#8217;t be  dependent on the money, so I&#8217;m inclined to vote to get less earlier.  Your thoughts? None of the usual discussion addresses the &#8220;quality of  life&#8221; aspect of Social Security checks.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You&#8217;re  right. The math typically favors delaying Social Security payments for  as long as you can. Your benefit gets bigger for every year you delay  until age 70. Also, your benefits are sharply reduced if you continue to  work after taking early Social Security checks.</p>
<p>But this is yet  another area where there are no one-size-fits-all solutions. Some people  may opt to apply for benefits early, perhaps because their life  expectancies are short, they want to let their investments continue to  grow tax-deferred or they simply want (or need) the money. Others may  delay for as long as possible to maximize their payouts.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t  know for sure in advance which is the right approach, since there are  so many variables involved — including how long you&#8217;ll live and how long  you&#8217;ll enjoy good health.</p>
<p>As you approach retirement, you should  make an appointment with a fee-only financial planner to review every  aspect of your retirement plans, including this particular issue.  Another good resource is the awkwardly titled &#8220;Personal Finance for  Seniors for Dummies&#8221; by Eric Tyson and Robert C. Carlson, who spend a  fair amount of ink on the &#8220;when to retire&#8221; conundrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/17/social-security-grab-it-early-or-wait-for-bigger-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it time to panic?</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/is-it-time-to-panic/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/is-it-time-to-panic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: Is there a reason not to panic? I see my investments tumbling and I am already very conservative. I don&#8217;t want to put it all under the mattress, but what else can a person do to hang on to what I have saved? I am fast approaching retirement age. Answer: If you&#8217;re prone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> Is there a reason not to panic? I see my investments  tumbling and I am already very conservative. I don&#8217;t want to put it all  under the mattress, but what else can a person do to hang on to what I  have saved? I am fast approaching retirement age.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> If you&#8217;re prone to panic, you should turn off the television pundits who like to scare people, which seems to be most of them.</p>
<p>What you need are perspective and balance. If you&#8217;re within 10 years of  retirement, you should invest in a session with a fee-only financial  planner to make sure your portfolio is appropriately diversified. Taking  too little risk can be as dangerous as taking too much when you have a  20-year (or longer) retirement horizon.</p>
<p>Over time, the stock market does march upward, although it&#8217;s never a smooth path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/is-it-time-to-panic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When a 15-year mortgage makes sense</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: You recently advised a couple who were in sound financial shape about possibly refinancing their home loan to a lower interest rate. You suggested a 15-year loan to make sure they entered retirement without a mortgage. Why not recommend getting a 30-year loan to get the lowest required monthly payment, then making extra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> You recently advised a couple who were in sound  financial shape about possibly refinancing their home loan to a lower  interest rate. You suggested a 15-year loan to make sure they entered  retirement without a mortgage. Why not recommend getting a 30-year loan  to get the lowest required monthly payment, then making extra payments  to get the loan paid off faster? This approach offers the flexibility of  being able to drop back to the lower payment in the event of a job loss  or other financial setback. They sounded like well-disciplined people  and probably could turn that 30-year loan into a 15-year loan by paying  13 payments a year instead of  12.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Refinancing to a 30-year loan can certainly make sense  for people who want to lock in the lowest payment and maintain their  financial flexibility in the face of possible financial setbacks. You&#8217;re  also right that this couple seems disciplined enough to make the extra  payments to get the loan retired before they do.</p>
<p>However, you missed a key factor: This well-disciplined couple had a  mortgage with an interest rate of 5.875%. That indicates they&#8217;ve  had  this mortgage for a while. If they&#8217;ve paid down enough of the principal  balance, they may be able to refinance to a 15-year loan with a  significantly lower interest rate (as in slightly over 3%) without  dramatically raising their payments. Many people, when faced with that  option, would want to lock in the lower rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Got extra cash? Boost your retirement contributions</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/19/got-extra-cash-boost-your-retirement-contributions/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/19/got-extra-cash-boost-your-retirement-contributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial priorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: My husband and I are in our late 40s. My husband is the sole provider. We have $200,000 equity in our home and a 5.875% interest on our mortgage. We have nine months&#8217; worth of expenses saved in an emergency fund, plus we contribute $100 a month to our son&#8217;s college fund and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> My husband and I are in our late 40s. My husband is  the sole provider. We have $200,000 equity in our home and a 5.875%  interest on our mortgage. We have nine months&#8217; worth of expenses saved  in an emergency fund, plus we contribute $100 a month to our son&#8217;s  college fund and 6% to my husband&#8217;s 401(k). We make regular monthly  payments on a student loan balance of $12,000 (at 4.167% interest) and a  personal loan balance of $12,000 (at 0%). My husband has had two  stretches of unemployment over the last five years, each lasting for  about six months. We have begun saving in a secondary account and are  uncertain how to best use that money. Should we pay off the student  loan? The mortgage? Invest in a CD or IRA? Or consider some other  investment strategy?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You don&#8217;t say how much is in  your husband&#8217;s 401(k), but a 6% contribution rate when you&#8217;re in your  late 40s is unlikely to generate a big-enough nest egg to retire.  Boosting that contribution rate should be your  priority, and you   should consider contributing to a Roth IRA for each of you.</p>
<p>Likewise,  saving anything for your child&#8217;s college education is smart, but $100 a  month won&#8217;t get you far. Just for comparison, consider that parents of  newborns need to save around $600 a month to pay the full cost of a  public college. Those who start later or want to cover a private college  have to contribute much more.</p>
<p>Most families aren&#8217;t able to save  that much, so the next best thing is to simply save what you can — after  you&#8217;re fully on track with your retirement savings.</p>
<p>You shouldn&#8217;t  prioritize paying down your relatively low-rate debts over these two  far more important goals. But you may want to consider refinancing your  mortgage to dramatically lower your rate and perhaps free up more cash  for your goals. Just try to make sure the loan will be paid off by the  time you plan to retire. A 15-year loan, in other words, might make more  sense than refinancing into another 30-year mortgage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/19/got-extra-cash-boost-your-retirement-contributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income dropped? Expenses have to drop, too</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/12/income-dropped-expenses-have-to-drop-too/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/12/income-dropped-expenses-have-to-drop-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home equity line of credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I was laid off in November 2009. For the first year, I took the unemployment and tried to find a job without success. So, in late 2010, I started my own business, contracting mainly for employers for whom I used to work. Unfortunately, I am making about a third of what I used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> I was laid off in November 2009. For the first year,  I took the unemployment and tried to find a job without success. So, in  late 2010, I started my own business, contracting mainly for employers  for whom I used to work. Unfortunately, I am making about a third of  what I used to make, and even after cutting expenses, there are months  that I can&#8217;t pay my bills. I have taken two withdrawals from my  self-directed IRA this year. Is that the smartest thing to do? Or should  I even out my cash flow by writing myself loans from my home equity  line of credit?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You need to accept your new reality, rather than papering it over with ill-advised loans or raids on your retirement accounts.</p>
<p>That  means reducing your expenses dramatically to reflect your new, lower  income. If your housing expenses eat up more than a third of your  current pay, for example, you need to consider your alternatives. You  have equity in your home, which should make a sale easier. If you want  to hang on to the house, consider getting roommates or even renting out  the house while you live elsewhere (if the rent will cover your home&#8217;s  monthly expenses).</p>
<p>You may have loan payments or other debts taken on when you  had more income that you can no longer afford. If that&#8217;s the case,  discuss your situation with both a legitimate credit counselor (one  affiliated with the National Foundation for Credit Counseling at <a href="http://www.nfcc.org/">http://www.nfcc.org</a>) and a bankruptcy attorney (find referrals from the National Assn. of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys at <a href="http://www.nacba.org/">http://www.nacba.org</a>).</p>
<p>Your  home equity should be reserved for emergencies, not used to finance a  lifestyle you can no longer afford. And your retirement funds should be  left alone for retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/12/income-dropped-expenses-have-to-drop-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t use retirement savings to pay credit card debt</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/12/dont-use-retirement-savings-to-pay-credit-card-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/12/dont-use-retirement-savings-to-pay-credit-card-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I had to retire because of illness at 44. I have $30,000 in credit card debt. Should I use the $24,000 in my 401(k) to pay off the majority of that debt? The payments are $1,000 a month. My wife and I can afford the payments, as we have a combined gross income [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> I had to retire because of illness at 44. I have  $30,000 in  credit card debt. Should I use the $24,000 in my 401(k) to  pay off the majority of that debt? The payments are $1,000 a month. My  wife and I can afford the payments, as we have a combined gross income  of $120,000. But we hate to think we&#8217;ll be paying forever and, worse  yet, what we&#8217;ll pay in interest over time. A home equity loan is out of  the question since we only have about $50,000. What should we do?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Don&#8217;t use retirement funds to pay off credit cards. Period.</p>
<p>If it pains you to think about the interest you&#8217;re paying,  good. That may keep you from running up more debt.</p>
<p>But  you&#8217;ll pay a lot more in the long run by raiding your retirement fund.  First, you&#8217;ll lose one-third or more of your savings ($8,000 or more) to  taxes and penalties. Then you&#8217;ll lose all the future, tax-deferred  returns your 401(k) could have earned. You can figure that the $24,000  will easily cost you more than $100,000 in lost future retirement  income.</p>
<p>A better approach is to cut your expenses so you can put  more money toward paying off your debt. An extra $500 a month could  shave a year or more off the time you&#8217;re in debt and save you a  considerable amount in interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/12/dont-use-retirement-savings-to-pay-credit-card-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you shouldn&#8217;t pay down your mortgage</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/06/why-you-shouldnt-pay-down-your-mortgage/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/06/why-you-shouldnt-pay-down-your-mortgage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: We have a 7% fixed-rate mortgage with a $150,000 balance and a second, adjustable rate mortgage with a balance of $100,000. I&#8217;m self-employed and my wife doesn&#8217;t work. My income fluctuates a lot every month. We just sold a property and have $240,000 left after taxes. Should I pay off both mortgages or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> We have a 7% fixed-rate mortgage with a $150,000  balance and a second, adjustable rate mortgage with a balance of  $100,000. I&#8217;m self-employed and my wife doesn&#8217;t work. My income  fluctuates a lot every month. We just sold a property and have $240,000  left after taxes. Should I pay off both mortgages or just the adjustable  loan?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> When deciding whether to pay off a mortgage, many people  focus on how much interest they could save or what their &#8220;return&#8221; on  their money would be. (If you&#8217;re in a 35% tax bracket for federal and  state income taxes, for example, your return on paying off a 7% mortgage  would be 4.6%.)</p>
<p>In reality, though, most people have better things to do with their cash than pay off relatively low-rate, tax-deductible debt.</p>
<p>Are you, for example, on track with your retirement savings? Do you have  a substantial emergency fund? Most families would be wise to set aside a  cash reserve to cover three to six months&#8217; worth of expenses. Someone  who is self-employed with a non-working wife might want to boost that  emergency fund to 12 months&#8217; worth of expenses.</p>
<p>Are you adequately insured? Since your wife is financially dependent on  you, you probably should  have a substantial life insurance policy. You  may want to get one on her as well, if she cares for minor children and  you&#8217;d have to hire a nanny if she died. You may also need disability  coverage.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve covered all these bases and still want to pay off your mortgages,  feel free. Otherwise, put the money to better use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/06/why-you-shouldnt-pay-down-your-mortgage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

