<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask Liz Weston &#187; mortgages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asklizweston.com/tag/mortgages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asklizweston.com</link>
	<description>Personal Finance Columnist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should you refinance a mortgage that&#8217;s almost paid off?</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2012/01/30/should-you-refinance-a-mortgage-thats-almost-paid-off/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2012/01/30/should-you-refinance-a-mortgage-thats-almost-paid-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: We have a second home close to a lake that we bought in 2002 for $370,000. It could have sold for $1 million at the peak of the market but is now worth about $800,000. We owe $100,000 on a mortgage with four years left until it’s paid off, but the payments are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Liz: We have a second home close to a lake that we bought in 2002 for $370,000. It could have sold for $1 million at the peak of the market but is now worth about $800,000. We owe $100,000 on a mortgage with four years left until it’s paid off, but the payments are a hardship and barely manageable. I don’t expect prices in the area to improve much in the next several years and they may decline more. Since I could sell the house now and get back all the money I ever put into it, I figure that every dollar I pay on it from now on is a dollar of profit burned. Selling the house is not an option, though, as my wife is adamant about keeping it. We are 10 years from retirement and have a kid to put through college. Our income is just under $100,000, we have no other debts and our primary home is paid off. Should we refinance the remaining balance to a 30-year loan, or just grin and bear it until the payoff in a few more years?</p>
<p>Answer: If you’re on track saving for retirement and your child’s college education, then the smart thing would be to gut it out and get the property paid off. You’re so close to the end of this loan that the majority of your payments go toward principal. Refinancing might lower your payments, but would dramatically increase the amount of interest you’d pay over time.</p>
<p>If you’re stinting your savings, though, the math gets more complicated. You could view the paid-off vacation home as an asset you could tap later for retirement expenses or college. In that case, getting it paid off on the current schedule would make sense. If selling or borrowing against the home in the future isn’t an option, though, then lowering your payments so you can save for your other goals starts to make some sense.</p>
<p>If that’s the option you choose, consider a 15-year loan rather than a 30-year loan. The shorter loan will still dramatically reduce your payment but you’ll pay about 60% less interest over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2012/01/30/should-you-refinance-a-mortgage-thats-almost-paid-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New rules may help more underwater homeowners</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2012/01/11/new-rules-may-help-more-underwater-homeowners/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2012/01/11/new-rules-may-help-more-underwater-homeowners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Affordable Refinance Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making Home Affordable Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I have an adjustable-rate mortgage that is currently at 3.125%. I&#8217;d like to fix the rate, but no one will even discuss it with me because my house has been appraised at less than $100,000 and the balance of the mortgage is $144,319. I have never been late, and my credit scores are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> I have an adjustable-rate mortgage that is currently at 3.125%. I&#8217;d like to fix the rate, but no one will even discuss it with me because my house has been appraised at less than $100,000 and the balance of the mortgage is $144,319. I have never been late, and my credit scores are above 800. What can I do? I don&#8217;t want a mortgage modification. I just want a fixed rate.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> If your loan was backed by <a id="ORCRP005575" title="Fannie Mae" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/macro-economics/mortgages/fannie-mae-ORCRP005575.topic">Fannie Mae</a> or <a id="ORCRP006178" title="Freddie Mac" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/freddie-mac-ORCRP006178.topic">Freddie Mac</a>, and if it was originated before June 1, 2009, you may be in luck, thanks to recent improvements to the federal government&#8217;s Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP.</p>
<p>Federal officials eliminated certain fees and barriers that made lenders reluctant to refinance underwater mortgages. They also eliminated the limit on how far underwater you could be to get help. In the past, you could owe no more than 125% of a home&#8217;s value.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll first need to find out whether you have a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loan. You can visit <a href="http://www.fanniemae.com/loanlookup">http://www.fanniemae.com/loanlookup</a> or call (800) 7FANNIE ([800] 732-6643). You&#8217;ll find information for Freddie Mac at <a href="http://www.freddiemac.com/corporate/">http://www.freddiemac.com/corporate</a> or by calling (800) FREDDIE ([800] 373-3343). The toll-free numbers are open from 5 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific time.</p>
<p>Borrowers must be current on their mortgage payments with no late payments in the previous six months and no more than one late payment in the previous 12 months. Loans that have been refinanced under the old HARP guidelines aren&#8217;t eligible for another refinance.</p>
<p>If your lender isn&#8217;t offering HARP refinances, you can search for others that are. You may want to contact a counselor approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (referrals at <a href="http://www.hud.gov/">http://www.hud.gov)</a> to help you through the process.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t make the mistake of entering &#8220;HARP&#8221; or &#8220;Home Affordable Refinance Program&#8221; into a search engine. Most of the links that will turn up will be to for-profit sites, not all of them reputable. For the real deal, visit <a href="http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/">http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov</a> or call (888) 995-HOPE ([888] 995-4673).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2012/01/11/new-rules-may-help-more-underwater-homeowners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shop hard before you refinance</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/19/shop-hard-before-you-refinance/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/19/shop-hard-before-you-refinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: In February 2007 we put down $75,000 on our $274,000 home purchase. In July 2010, our home appraised for $261,000. We wanted to refinance with the bank that holds our mortgage. Recently they sent an appraiser who appraised our home at $235,000. So our choices are pay almost $200 a month in mortgage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> In February 2007 we put down $75,000 on our $274,000 home purchase. In July 2010, our home appraised for $261,000. We wanted to refinance with the bank that holds our mortgage. Recently they sent an appraiser who appraised our home at $235,000. So our choices are pay almost $200 a month in mortgage insurance, bring about $6,000 to closing or withdraw the loan. I feel we tried to do the right thing: We put down more than 25% on our home, always pay on time and have FICO scores over 800. But the bank that can help us save on our loan is hurting us, not helping. What can we do?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Your lender isn&#8217;t under any obligation to help you save money. As a result — and as you&#8217;ve discovered — there&#8217;s often little advantage in sticking with the lender you have.</p>
<p>Whenever you refinance, you should shop and shop hard. Applying with at least two lenders will allow you to compare refinancing deals. It&#8217;s possible that another lender would have given you a low appraisal as well, but at least you wouldn&#8217;t be held captive in the way you are now.</p>
<p>If you want to continue with this lender and expect to remain in the home for more than a few years, bring the cash to the closing so you can pay down your loan balance to the point where you won&#8217;t need mortgage insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/19/shop-hard-before-you-refinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get help with a mortgage modification</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/19/get-help-with-a-mortgage-modification/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/19/get-help-with-a-mortgage-modification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage modifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: Your recent answer to the reader who was trying to get a mortgage modification was on the money. The staff at our mortgage servicer is not only poorly trained but completely irresponsible. They promise personal representation, then never call again, and fail to answer voice messages left for them. There are no supervisors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> Your recent answer to the reader who was trying to get a mortgage modification was on the money. The staff at our mortgage servicer is not only poorly trained but completely irresponsible. They promise personal representation, then never call again, and fail to answer voice messages left for them. There are no supervisors to answer difficult questions. They cannot (or will not) give criteria for approval. They give ever-shifting reasons for denial, but ignore the responses I have given. I have been trying for a year and will continue until I am approved. But what a terrible hassle. They must have some secret agenda for not doing these loan modifications.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> There&#8217;s a lot of finger-pointing going on right now about why more mortgage modifications aren&#8217;t being done, but few would argue that lenders are doing a terrible job of communicating with their customers. You might want to consider enlisting the help of a housing counselor approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development in your quest. The counselors&#8217; services are free or low cost, and you can get referrals at <a href="http://www.hud.gov/">http://www.hud.gov.</a> Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/19/get-help-with-a-mortgage-modification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will you face a tax bill after foreclosure?</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/12/will-you-face-a-tax-bill-after-foreclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/12/will-you-face-a-tax-bill-after-foreclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: Several years ago, we were talked into getting what I believe was a predatory loan — a negatively amortizing mortgage for 100% of the purchase price of our home. The loan broker assured us we could refinance the following year to a more traditional mortgage. We paid the minimum monthly payment required, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> Several years ago, we were talked into getting what I believe was a predatory loan — a negatively amortizing mortgage for 100% of the purchase price of our home. The loan broker assured us we could refinance the following year to a more traditional mortgage.</p>
<p>We paid the minimum monthly payment required, which didn&#8217;t cover all the interest owed, so that amount was added to our mortgage balance. Like others, we have experienced the nightmare of the current housing market, and with the negative amortization adding on even more debt, we are severely underwater.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve worked with two companies trying to get a workable loan modification but to no avail. The bank is not cooperating at all.</p>
<p>A lawyer I consulted is advising us not to pay at all going forward, saying that the upside-down home isn&#8217;t worth saving or worth the grief. She told us to put our payment amounts into savings so that we have something to live on after we have to leave the home, which I so far have been able to do. But I&#8217;m worried about the potential fallout.</p>
<p>Would we be required to pay taxes on the remaining balance we owe after a foreclosure? If we can&#8217;t afford to pay the taxes on $200,000 of untaxed income (that we really didn&#8217;t earn), what do we do then? Does bankruptcy help with that?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> When a lender cancels or &#8220;forgives&#8221; debt, it typically sends you a Form 1099 for the amount of forgiven debt. This amount usually must be included as income on your tax return. But there&#8217;s a big exception when it comes to mortgage debt secured by your primary residence.</p>
<p>The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 generally allows you to exclude from your income the debt that&#8217;s left over after a foreclosure. The law applies for the calendar years 2007 through 2012.</p>
<p>You can find more information about the act in <a id="ORGOV000010" title="Internal Revenue Service" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/internal-revenue-service-ORGOV000010.topic">IRS</a> Publication 4681, Canceled Debts, Foreclosures, Repossessions, and Abandonments, as well as in IRS news release IR-2008-17.</p>
<p>In some cases, lenders aren&#8217;t content to write off the excess debt and instead decide to pursue homeowners after foreclosure for the remaining balance owed. You may be protected by state law from such a lawsuit (as homeowners in California typically are), but you&#8217;ll want to discuss this possibility with your attorney. If you are hit with such a lawsuit, you may need to consider filing for bankruptcy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/12/12/will-you-face-a-tax-bill-after-foreclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t expect mortgage lender to do the right thing</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/11/21/dont-expect-mortgage-lender-to-do-the-right-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/11/21/dont-expect-mortgage-lender-to-do-the-right-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing counselor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage modifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: We applied for a loan modification a year ago and submitted all the paperwork requested on time. Our lender claims we were denied because of missing papers. I had everything documented, so the denial was appealed, but as of now we&#8217;re still waiting to hear whether we were approved or not. What can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> We applied for a loan modification a year ago and submitted all the paperwork requested on time. Our lender claims we were denied because of missing papers. I had everything documented, so the denial was appealed, but as of now we&#8217;re still waiting to hear whether we were approved or not. What can we do? We haven&#8217;t made a payment since last March. We have the money on hand to make three trial payments, as we were originally instructed, but I&#8217;m so worried.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Unfortunately, your experience is all too common — and too often people waiting for an answer from their lender wind up losing their homes to foreclosure. Lenders&#8217; poorly trained and poorly staffed loan modification departments have created endless nightmares for homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure.</p>
<p>You should immediately enlist the help of a counselor approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. You can get referrals from <a href="http://www.hud.gov/">http://www.hud.gov</a> or by calling (800) 569-4287. The advice is free or low-cost. A counselor can help assess your situation, offer alternatives and guide you through the modification process — if a modification is still an option.</p>
<p>You also should read attorney Stephen Elias&#8217; excellent book &#8220;The Foreclosure Survival Guide: Keep Your House or Walk Away With Money in Your Pocket.&#8221;</p>
<p>What you shouldn&#8217;t do is expect the lender to do the &#8220;right&#8221; thing, including honoring any promises or commitments made to you. The people who get loan modifications have to be tenacious, persistent and savvy about the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/11/21/dont-expect-mortgage-lender-to-do-the-right-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New government refi program may actually help homeowners&#8211;finally</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/new-government-refi-program-may-actually-help-homeowners-finally/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/new-government-refi-program-may-actually-help-homeowners-finally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liz's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making Home Affordable Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Struggling, underwater homeowners finally have a ray of hope. Changes to the vastly-underused Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) could actually help as many as 1.6 million homeowners refinance into a more affordable mortgage. It won&#8217;t matter how far underwater you are: as long as you&#8217;re employed and current on your mortgage, you can qualify for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://asklizweston.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/DSC04250.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2123" title="Home" src="http://asklizweston.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/DSC04250-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>Struggling, underwater homeowners finally have a ray of hope.</p>
<p>Changes to the vastly-underused <a href="http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/programs/lower-rates/Pages/harp.aspx" target="_blank">Home Affordable Refinance Program </a>(HARP) could actually help as many as 1.6 million homeowners refinance into a more affordable mortgage. It won&#8217;t matter how far underwater you are: as long as you&#8217;re employed and current on your mortgage, you can qualify for a refinance. (Current means no late payments in the prior six months, and no more than one late in the past 12 months.) Most importantly, you&#8217;re not stuck trying to deal with your current lender. You can shop around.</p>
<p>So many government proposals to help homeowners have fallen so far short that it&#8217;s tempting to be cynical about yet another announcement of change. But look under the hood of these changes, and you&#8217;ll see that federal regulators are abolishing or at least reducing many of the obstacles that kept a lot of people from taking advantage of some of the lowest interest rates in generations. Estimates of how many homeowners could be helped have ranged from 800,000 to 1.6 million.</p>
<p>Granted, this kind of help should have come a long time ago, but it didn&#8217;t. Here&#8217;s what you need to know now:</p>
<p><strong>Fannie and Freddie loans only.</strong> The HARP program covers only loans for primary residences sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the taxpayer-owned mortgage investors that currently buy 90% of mortgages. The new, easier refinancing applies only to loans turned over to the agencies before June 2009. To find out if either agency owns your mortgage, check <a href="http://www.fanniemae.com/loanlookup/" target="_blank">here</a> at Fannie Mae and <a href="https://ww3.freddiemac.com/corporate/" target="_blank">here </a>at Freddie Mac. When radio host Bob McCormick and I were answering questions about the program this morning on KFWB, we heard from some investors who were hoping for help with rental properties, but that&#8217;s not who the HARP program was meant to serve. FHA, VA and USDA loans are not covered; neither are jumbo loans or &#8220;portfolio&#8221; loans&#8211;those kept by the lender, rather than sold to Fannie or Freddie. You&#8217;re also not eligible if you already refinanced under HARP.</p>
<p><strong>LTV limit goes away.</strong> Under the current program, you can&#8217;t qualify for a refinance is you owe more than 125% of the value of your home (your &#8220;loan to value&#8221; or LTV), and many of the lenders who bothered wouldn&#8217;t make loans if you were over 105%. The new version eliminates the limit, although you still have to have less than 20% equity (if your loan is less than 80% of your home value, you won&#8217;t qualify for refinancing under this program).</p>
<p><strong>The refi process is streamlined.</strong> Typically, requirements for appraisals and extensive underwriting will disappear. That&#8217;s because banks are going to be shielded from &#8220;buy back&#8221; risk from Fannie and Freddie. The threat that they might have to take the loans back has made lenders extra-careful about the loans they make&#8211;which means many loans aren&#8217;t being made at all. You&#8217;ll need to provide proof of employment or another regular source of income, but you won&#8217;t need to pay for an appraisal upfront or submit reams of documentation.</p>
<p><strong>Mortgage insurers are on board.</strong> Another obstacle to refinancing is private mortgage insurers that have refused to transfer coverage. These insurers have promised to make transfers much easier under the new HARP rules.</p>
<p><strong>Second mortgage lenders are on board.</strong> If you have a home equity loan or line of credit, you&#8217;ve typically needed to get that lender&#8217;s permission to refinance, a process known as re-subordination. Recalcitrant or overloaded second mortgage lenders have prevented plenty of refinancings in the past, but federal officials say the largest lenders have now agreed to automatically re-subordinate second mortgages under HARP.</p>
<p><strong>Risk fees can be waived.</strong> Fannie and Freddie have agreed to waive the fees they were charging for riskier borrowers if those borrowers opted for a shorter-term mortgage than the one they currently have. Refinancing into a 15-year mortgage, then, from your current 30-year loan could save you some dough. If you&#8217;ve missed previous refinance opportunities because you were under water and you&#8217;re several years into your loan, you may find that your new payment isn&#8217;t significantly higher than your old one.</p>
<p>Final details of the changes are scheduled to be submitted to lenders by Nov. 15. If you think you may qualify, line up a chat with a HUD-approved housing counselor (find one <a href="http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/i_want_to/talk_to_a_housing_counselor" target="_blank">here</a>) and get ready to take advantage of a government program that could actually help you stay in your home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/new-government-refi-program-may-actually-help-homeowners-finally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why refinancing isn&#8217;t easier</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/10/why-refinancing-isnt-easier/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/10/why-refinancing-isnt-easier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: This is a response to your answer to the reader who asked why home refinancing wasn&#8217;t simpler. All the reasons you cite are the same ones that banks cite. But they are all irrelevant for refinances conducted by the same lender. I am assuming two things about the reader&#8217;s situation: (1) they haven&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> This is a response to your answer to the reader who  asked why home refinancing wasn&#8217;t simpler. All the reasons you cite are  the same ones that banks cite. But they are all irrelevant for  refinances conducted by the same lender. I am assuming two things about  the reader&#8217;s situation: (1) they haven&#8217;t been late on any payment, let  alone missed one, and (2) they are seeking to lower an interest rate  that is higher than current market. If so, then it doesn&#8217;t matter if the  house is in poor condition, if the person&#8217;s income has declined or even  if the person has a job. While the new tighter standards are relevant  to new loans, the bank already has this one and it&#8217;s in the bank&#8217;s best  interest to make sure it remains a good loan. If a keystroke refi with a  lower interest rate helps ensure that, then why not?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> If it were in banks&#8217; best interests to make sure their  home loans remained in good standing, we probably wouldn&#8217;t be in the  real estate mess we&#8217;re in today. Banks would have been far more willing  to refinance or modify loans than they have been.</p>
<p>In fact, most banks don&#8217;t hang on to the loans they make. The loans are  sold to investors, and the bank becomes the loan servicer, essentially  just processing the payments.</p>
<p>Once you understand that, you understand that a refinance is, in fact, a  new loan that must meet the criteria of the investors that will  eventually buy the loan. Today, the vast majority of home loans are  purchased by <a id="ORCRP005575" title="Fannie Mae" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/macro-economics/mortgages/fannie-mae-ORCRP005575.topic">Fannie Mae</a> and <a id="ORCRP006178" title="Freddie Mac" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/freddie-mac-ORCRP006178.topic">Freddie Mac</a>,  taxpayer-owned entities that already have billions of dollars in bad  loans on their books. They aren&#8217;t interested in adding any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/10/why-refinancing-isnt-easier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When a 15-year mortgage makes sense</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: You recently advised a couple who were in sound financial shape about possibly refinancing their home loan to a lower interest rate. You suggested a 15-year loan to make sure they entered retirement without a mortgage. Why not recommend getting a 30-year loan to get the lowest required monthly payment, then making extra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> You recently advised a couple who were in sound  financial shape about possibly refinancing their home loan to a lower  interest rate. You suggested a 15-year loan to make sure they entered  retirement without a mortgage. Why not recommend getting a 30-year loan  to get the lowest required monthly payment, then making extra payments  to get the loan paid off faster? This approach offers the flexibility of  being able to drop back to the lower payment in the event of a job loss  or other financial setback. They sounded like well-disciplined people  and probably could turn that 30-year loan into a 15-year loan by paying  13 payments a year instead of  12.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Refinancing to a 30-year loan can certainly make sense  for people who want to lock in the lowest payment and maintain their  financial flexibility in the face of possible financial setbacks. You&#8217;re  also right that this couple seems disciplined enough to make the extra  payments to get the loan retired before they do.</p>
<p>However, you missed a key factor: This well-disciplined couple had a  mortgage with an interest rate of 5.875%. That indicates they&#8217;ve  had  this mortgage for a while. If they&#8217;ve paid down enough of the principal  balance, they may be able to refinance to a 15-year loan with a  significantly lower interest rate (as in slightly over 3%) without  dramatically raising their payments. Many people, when faced with that  option, would want to lock in the lower rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No down payment saved? You&#8217;re not ready to buy a home</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/26/no-down-payment-saved-youre-not-ready-to-buy-a-home/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/26/no-down-payment-saved-youre-not-ready-to-buy-a-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Scores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Down Payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FICO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FICO scores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: My wife and I are considering buying a home for the first time. We&#8217;re planning to switch our accounts from our bank to a credit union. We&#8217;re in the midst of receiving a bad report from the bank, and that&#8217;s why we want to change. But is that a wise choice when we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz: </strong>My wife and I are considering buying a home for the  first time. We&#8217;re planning to switch our accounts from our bank to a  credit union. We&#8217;re in the midst of receiving a bad report from the  bank, and that&#8217;s why we want to change. But is that a wise choice when  we want to buy a home? Also, what options do we have for a mortgage when  we don&#8217;t have any money for a down payment? Are we locked into an <a id="ORGOV000258" title="Federal Housing Administration" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/realty/federal-housing-administration-ORGOV000258.topic">FHA</a> loan, or are there other choices? We are middle-class people making an  average of $40,000 a year with no kids and OK credit scores.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> If you don&#8217;t have a down payment saved, you aren&#8217;t ready to be homeowners.</p>
<p>Homeownership  is expensive, with lots of unexpected costs constantly popping up. Some  are relatively minor, like having to replace a worn-out appliance,  while others are major, such as having to replace a furnace or a roof.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why homeownership isn&#8217;t a good idea for people who  aren&#8217;t already in the habit of living below their means and saving a  decent proportion of their incomes.</p>
<p>Take the next year or so to  tweak your spending and save up a down payment. You&#8217;ll need at least a  3.5% down payment to qualify for an FHA loan. A bigger down payment will  give you more loan options and won&#8217;t leave you upside down on your home  from the first day. A 20% down payment is often best, since you can  avoid private mortgage insurance.</p>
<p>A year also will give you time  to polish those credit scores from &#8220;OK&#8221; to &#8220;good.&#8221; The higher your  scores, the better the interest rate you&#8217;ll receive.</p>
<p>But the fact  that you&#8217;re receiving a &#8220;bad report&#8221; from your bank is worrisome. You  don&#8217;t specify what happened, but anything that could be reported to the  credit bureaus, such as a missed credit card payment, could cause major  damage to your scores. Simply switching to another institution won&#8217;t  prevent that. And if you&#8217;ve piled up a bunch of bounced checks, your  credit reports may not be damaged but you could find it difficult to  open new accounts at other financial institutions.</p>
<p>Whatever  happened, you should try to straighten it out with the bank before you  decamp, even if you ultimately decide to switch accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/26/no-down-payment-saved-youre-not-ready-to-buy-a-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

