<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask Liz Weston &#187; Retirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asklizweston.com/category/qawithliz/retirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asklizweston.com</link>
	<description>Personal Finance Columnist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Retirement planning without a retirement plan</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/31/retirement-planning-without-a-retirement-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/31/retirement-planning-without-a-retirement-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Retirement Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roth IRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: After nine months of unemployment I finally landed a new job, but at half my former $100,000 salary. In this economy I was happy to get it. I always contributed the maximum to my 401(k) and employee stock purchase plan, but my new company does not offer either of these options. I made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> After nine months of unemployment I finally landed a new job, but at half my former $100,000 salary. In this economy I was happy to get it. I always contributed the maximum to my 401(k) and employee stock purchase plan, but my new company does not offer either of these options. I made it through my period of unemployment on severance, savings and belt tightening. Other than a mortgage, I have no debt. I realize I need to both catch up on missed contributions and continue to put away money for retirement. I just turned 60. What is my best move for continued retirement saving? And how will my reduced salary affect my future Social Security benefits?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You don&#8217;t need your employer to help you save for retirement, fortunately. Since you&#8217;re over 50, you can contribute $6,000 to an IRA or Roth IRA annually. You can open an account at virtually any bank, brokerage or credit union. Look for one that doesn&#8217;t charge you account service fees and that has a broad array of low-cost investment options. Vanguard, for example, waives its service fees for IRA investors who sign up for electronic statements.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re able to save more, you can do so in a regular, taxable brokerage account. You won&#8217;t get a tax break for your contributions, as you would with a traditional IRA, but you can qualify for low capital gains tax rates if you hold your investments for at least a year.</p>
<p>Your Social Security benefits will be based on your 35 highest-earning years. The Social Security website (<a href="http://www.ssa.gov%29/">http://www.ssa.gov</a>) has a <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/planners/calculators.htm">benefits calculator</a> that enables you to see your estimated future benefit based on your work record so far, and that enables you to create different scenarios — such as a lower salary going forward, or different retirement ages — to gauge their effect on your future checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/31/retirement-planning-without-a-retirement-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s no such thing as &#8220;risk free&#8221; retirement investing</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-risk-free-retirement-investing/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-risk-free-retirement-investing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I just started saving for retirement through my job&#8217;s 401(k) plan. I&#8217;ve been putting aside $400 a month. I just checked my account to see how it was doing. It has lost over $600! I am trying to save for my retirement — not lose. Where should I invest? I&#8217;m considering getting a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> I just started saving for retirement through my job&#8217;s 401(k) plan. I&#8217;ve been putting aside $400 a month. I just checked my account to see how it was doing. It has lost over $600! I am trying to save for my retirement — not lose. Where should I invest? I&#8217;m considering getting a financial planner to help me.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> The most important thing you need to know about investing is that there is no such thing as a truly risk-free investment.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t lose your principal if you invest in &#8220;safe&#8221; investments, such as Treasuries and <a id="ORGOV0000242" title="Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/regulatory-policy-organizations/federal-deposit-insurance-corporation-ORGOV0000242.topic">FDIC</a>-insured bank accounts. But you won&#8217;t earn enough to keep ahead of inflation. Basically, you&#8217;ll never be able to save enough to retire, since the purchasing power of your funds will erode over time rather than grow.</p>
<p>To stay ahead of inflation, you need to take more risk. Stocks over time have consistently offered returns that beat inflation. In every 30-year period starting in 1928, stocks have returned average annual returns of at least 8%. But they certainly don&#8217;t gain that much every year, and some years you&#8217;ll face steep losses. When you invest in stocks, you have to be prepared for volatility. In other words, sometimes your investments will lose money.</p>
<p>You can reduce that volatility somewhat by diversifying your stock investments (some small companies, some large; some U.S. companies, some foreign) and by including a diversified mix of bonds in your portfolio, along with cash.</p>
<p>A fee-only financial planner can help you design an investment plan that makes sense for your situation. Or you can consider opting for the &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; or &#8220;target date retirement&#8221; funds offered by your plan, since they do the diversification and rebalancing for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-risk-free-retirement-investing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security: Grab it early, or wait for bigger checks?</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/17/social-security-grab-it-early-or-wait-for-bigger-checks/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/17/social-security-grab-it-early-or-wait-for-bigger-checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: Which is really better? A smaller Social Security check starting at age 62 that you are still young enough to enjoy for years? Or a much larger Social Security check beginning at 70 that you get for a much shorter period, and then just gets signed over to the nursing home or assisted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> Which is really better? A smaller Social Security  check starting at age 62 that you are still young enough to enjoy for  years? Or a much larger Social Security check beginning at 70 that you  get for a much shorter period, and then just gets signed over to the  nursing home or assisted living facility where you wind up? I won&#8217;t be  dependent on the money, so I&#8217;m inclined to vote to get less earlier.  Your thoughts? None of the usual discussion addresses the &#8220;quality of  life&#8221; aspect of Social Security checks.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You&#8217;re  right. The math typically favors delaying Social Security payments for  as long as you can. Your benefit gets bigger for every year you delay  until age 70. Also, your benefits are sharply reduced if you continue to  work after taking early Social Security checks.</p>
<p>But this is yet  another area where there are no one-size-fits-all solutions. Some people  may opt to apply for benefits early, perhaps because their life  expectancies are short, they want to let their investments continue to  grow tax-deferred or they simply want (or need) the money. Others may  delay for as long as possible to maximize their payouts.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t  know for sure in advance which is the right approach, since there are  so many variables involved — including how long you&#8217;ll live and how long  you&#8217;ll enjoy good health.</p>
<p>As you approach retirement, you should  make an appointment with a fee-only financial planner to review every  aspect of your retirement plans, including this particular issue.  Another good resource is the awkwardly titled &#8220;Personal Finance for  Seniors for Dummies&#8221; by Eric Tyson and Robert C. Carlson, who spend a  fair amount of ink on the &#8220;when to retire&#8221; conundrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/17/social-security-grab-it-early-or-wait-for-bigger-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it time to panic?</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/is-it-time-to-panic/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/is-it-time-to-panic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: Is there a reason not to panic? I see my investments tumbling and I am already very conservative. I don&#8217;t want to put it all under the mattress, but what else can a person do to hang on to what I have saved? I am fast approaching retirement age. Answer: If you&#8217;re prone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> Is there a reason not to panic? I see my investments  tumbling and I am already very conservative. I don&#8217;t want to put it all  under the mattress, but what else can a person do to hang on to what I  have saved? I am fast approaching retirement age.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> If you&#8217;re prone to panic, you should turn off the television pundits who like to scare people, which seems to be most of them.</p>
<p>What you need are perspective and balance. If you&#8217;re within 10 years of  retirement, you should invest in a session with a fee-only financial  planner to make sure your portfolio is appropriately diversified. Taking  too little risk can be as dangerous as taking too much when you have a  20-year (or longer) retirement horizon.</p>
<p>Over time, the stock market does march upward, although it&#8217;s never a smooth path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/is-it-time-to-panic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When a 15-year mortgage makes sense</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage refinancings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=3021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: You recently advised a couple who were in sound financial shape about possibly refinancing their home loan to a lower interest rate. You suggested a 15-year loan to make sure they entered retirement without a mortgage. Why not recommend getting a 30-year loan to get the lowest required monthly payment, then making extra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> You recently advised a couple who were in sound  financial shape about possibly refinancing their home loan to a lower  interest rate. You suggested a 15-year loan to make sure they entered  retirement without a mortgage. Why not recommend getting a 30-year loan  to get the lowest required monthly payment, then making extra payments  to get the loan paid off faster? This approach offers the flexibility of  being able to drop back to the lower payment in the event of a job loss  or other financial setback. They sounded like well-disciplined people  and probably could turn that 30-year loan into a 15-year loan by paying  13 payments a year instead of  12.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Refinancing to a 30-year loan can certainly make sense  for people who want to lock in the lowest payment and maintain their  financial flexibility in the face of possible financial setbacks. You&#8217;re  also right that this couple seems disciplined enough to make the extra  payments to get the loan retired before they do.</p>
<p>However, you missed a key factor: This well-disciplined couple had a  mortgage with an interest rate of 5.875%. That indicates they&#8217;ve  had  this mortgage for a while. If they&#8217;ve paid down enough of the principal  balance, they may be able to refinance to a 15-year loan with a  significantly lower interest rate (as in slightly over 3%) without  dramatically raising their payments. Many people, when faced with that  option, would want to lock in the lower rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/10/03/when-a-15-year-mortgage-makes-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Got extra cash? Boost your retirement contributions</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/19/got-extra-cash-boost-your-retirement-contributions/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/19/got-extra-cash-boost-your-retirement-contributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial priorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: My husband and I are in our late 40s. My husband is the sole provider. We have $200,000 equity in our home and a 5.875% interest on our mortgage. We have nine months&#8217; worth of expenses saved in an emergency fund, plus we contribute $100 a month to our son&#8217;s college fund and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> My husband and I are in our late 40s. My husband is  the sole provider. We have $200,000 equity in our home and a 5.875%  interest on our mortgage. We have nine months&#8217; worth of expenses saved  in an emergency fund, plus we contribute $100 a month to our son&#8217;s  college fund and 6% to my husband&#8217;s 401(k). We make regular monthly  payments on a student loan balance of $12,000 (at 4.167% interest) and a  personal loan balance of $12,000 (at 0%). My husband has had two  stretches of unemployment over the last five years, each lasting for  about six months. We have begun saving in a secondary account and are  uncertain how to best use that money. Should we pay off the student  loan? The mortgage? Invest in a CD or IRA? Or consider some other  investment strategy?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You don&#8217;t say how much is in  your husband&#8217;s 401(k), but a 6% contribution rate when you&#8217;re in your  late 40s is unlikely to generate a big-enough nest egg to retire.  Boosting that contribution rate should be your  priority, and you   should consider contributing to a Roth IRA for each of you.</p>
<p>Likewise,  saving anything for your child&#8217;s college education is smart, but $100 a  month won&#8217;t get you far. Just for comparison, consider that parents of  newborns need to save around $600 a month to pay the full cost of a  public college. Those who start later or want to cover a private college  have to contribute much more.</p>
<p>Most families aren&#8217;t able to save  that much, so the next best thing is to simply save what you can — after  you&#8217;re fully on track with your retirement savings.</p>
<p>You shouldn&#8217;t  prioritize paying down your relatively low-rate debts over these two  far more important goals. But you may want to consider refinancing your  mortgage to dramatically lower your rate and perhaps free up more cash  for your goals. Just try to make sure the loan will be paid off by the  time you plan to retire. A 15-year loan, in other words, might make more  sense than refinancing into another 30-year mortgage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/09/19/got-extra-cash-boost-your-retirement-contributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raiding retirement funds could deplete them</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/29/raiding-retirement-funds-could-deplete-them/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/29/raiding-retirement-funds-could-deplete-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I retired two years ago at age 60 and draw $5,525 a month from two pensions, which covers our necessary expenses. What it doesn’t cover is travel, which we enjoy. To pay for our trips, I’ve been withdrawing $10,000 a year from my 401(k). So far, the account has grown enough to offset [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Liz: I retired two years ago at age 60 and draw $5,525 a month from two pensions, which covers our necessary expenses. What it doesn’t cover is travel, which we enjoy. To pay for our trips, I’ve been withdrawing $10,000 a year from my 401(k). So far, the account has grown enough to offset these withdrawals. I’d like to wait to start claiming Social Security, since I know that will increase my benefit. Should I continue my annual withdrawal from my 401(k) for the next couple of years and not start Social Security, or apply for Social Security and not touch the 401(k) so it can keep growing?</p>
<p>Answer: You’ve been lucky the past two years, but your luck may soon run out.</p>
<p>Favorable market conditions allowed your 401(k) to make up for your withdrawals, but there’s no guarantee that will continue. Bad markets dramatically increase the chances a retiree will run out of money, since withdrawals are being made from a shrinking account. The money taken out isn’t there to benefit from the inevitable rebound.</p>
<p>That doesn’t necessarily mean your withdrawals, or your travel, has to stop. But you need to have a better handle on how much you can withdraw each year without running a big risk of running out of money. You can get a rough idea by using mutual fund company T. Rowe Price’s retirement income calculator at <a href="http://www.troweprice.com/ric">www.troweprice.com/ric</a>. For the best results, however, you should hire a fee-only financial planner to review your situation and make suggestions about how to make your money last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/29/raiding-retirement-funds-could-deplete-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t tap retirement funds for a bigger down payment</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/15/dont-tap-retirement-funds-for-a-bigger-down-payment/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/15/dont-tap-retirement-funds-for-a-bigger-down-payment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Down Payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early withdrawal penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: My husband is 30 and I&#8217;m 28. We were told the importance of contributing to our retirements and so now have $58,000 saved. We have an additional $65,000 saved for a down payment. Due to my son&#8217;s recent liver transplant, I won&#8217;t be able to work for an indefinite amount of time, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> My husband is 30 and I&#8217;m 28. We were told the  importance of contributing to our retirements and so now have $58,000  saved. We have an additional $65,000 saved for a down payment. Due to my  son&#8217;s recent liver transplant, I won&#8217;t be able to work for an  indefinite amount of time, so we are reduced to one income of about  $60,000. We have to move to get into a better school district and can&#8217;t  decide what to do.  We&#8217;re currently looking at homes in the  $200,000-to-$250,000 range. My husband wants to use my $38,000  retirement savings (which would be $30,000 once taxed) to get into a  home with a lower payment that will not require me to work. I&#8217;m scared  to do this since everyone preaches retirement, but at this rate we won&#8217;t  have a mortgage when we retire. Plus, who wants to be a millionaire at  60! I want to enjoy life while we&#8217;re young and our kids are young. We  are very disciplined but just don&#8217;t know what to do. Thanks!</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> You can enjoy life and still refrain from doing stupid things that will jeopardize your retirement.</p>
<p>And tapping retirement funds early is typically pretty stupid. You&#8217;re  giving up all the future tax-deferred returns that money could have  earned. By the time you&#8217;re 60, that $38,000 could have grown to nearly  $450,000.</p>
<p>You also may be underestimating the tax bite. You can withdraw up to  $10,000 from an individual retirement account for a first-time home  purchase, but the remainder of the withdrawal will be penalized at a 10%  federal rate, plus whatever penalty your state assesses. The entire  withdrawal will be taxed at your current income tax rates.</p>
<p>The taxes and penalties are substantial for a reason: You&#8217;re supposed to  leave this money alone. Since you probably won&#8217;t be able to contribute  to a retirement account for a while, it&#8217;s even more important not to  squander these funds.</p>
<p>Besides, the extra $30,000 would lower your monthly payment by about  $160 on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at 5%. That doesn&#8217;t seem like much  of a payoff considering what you&#8217;d be giving up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/15/dont-tap-retirement-funds-for-a-bigger-down-payment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do your research before relocating</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/08/do-your-research-before-relocating/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/08/do-your-research-before-relocating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downsizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I&#8217;m 55 and single with no dependents. I have about $250,000 invested. I rent an apartment in Los Angeles. I work in sales, which I can do anywhere. Would I be better off buying a house for about $150,000 now (somewhere in the middle of the country), thus reducing my living expenses (property [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> I&#8217;m 55 and single with no dependents. I have about  $250,000 invested. I rent an apartment in Los Angeles. I work in sales,  which I can do anywhere. Would I be better off buying a house for about  $150,000 now (somewhere in the middle of the country), thus reducing my  living expenses (property tax and insurance will cost much less than  rent) and leaving me with about $100,000 left for retirement, or just  continuing to invest the entire $250,000 for retirement?</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Moving to a less costly part of the country is a time-honored way to  make your money stretch further in retirement. It also can help you save  more for retirement if you dramatically lower your living expenses.</p>
<p>What  you don&#8217;t want to do, though, is incur all the expenses of moving and  buying a new home only to discover you hate where you&#8217;re living. Do  substantial research and visit your targeted communities at different  times of year before you commit.</p>
<p>Also, tying up 60% of your  portfolio  in a single, illiquid asset such as a home is risky. You may  well be better off moving to a cheaper area and continuing to rent until  you&#8217;ve built up a bigger nest egg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/08/do-your-research-before-relocating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ducking payroll taxes in retirement</title>
		<link>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/08/ducking-payroll-taxes-in-retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/08/ducking-payroll-taxes-in-retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizweston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asklizweston.com/?p=2925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Liz: I am 66 and receive Social Security benefits in addition to working part time. I&#8217;m covered by Medicare. My employer deducts payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare from my paycheck. Since I get no benefit from these taxes, do I have any recourse to recovering what amounts to $100 a month? My [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Liz:</strong> I am 66 and receive Social Security benefits in addition to working part time. I&#8217;m covered by <a id="HEPRG00002" title="Medicare" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/health/government-health-care/medicare-HEPRG00002.topic">Medicare</a>.  My employer deducts payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare from  my paycheck. Since I get no benefit from these taxes, do I have any  recourse to recovering what amounts to $100 a month? My employer says  the payroll service it subscribes to automatically makes these  deductions.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> The short answer is no. If you work,  you typically have to pay into the Medicare and Social Security systems.  Console yourself with the fact that you&#8217;re at least receiving the  benefits for which you paid earlier. Younger workers typically pay in  much more each month with no assurance they&#8217;ll get the full benefits  they&#8217;ve been promised. As currently structured, Social Security will be  able to pay just 75% of promised benefits after 2036, and Medicare is  scheduled to run into the red several years earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://asklizweston.com/2011/08/08/ducking-payroll-taxes-in-retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

